Charles A. Shook (1876-1939) True Origin of Book of Mormon (Cincinnati: Standard Pub. Co., 1914) |
62
THE TRUE ORIGIN OF
SPAULDING'S ROMAN STORY. It was while living at Conneaut that Spaulding became interested in the aboriginal works of the country and began to write romances based upon them. The first of these, which is variously known as his "Manuscript No. I" "Manuscript Story -- Conneaut Creek," "Honolulu Manuscript" and "Roman Story," he began in the year 1809. 3 This manuscript gives an account of____________ 1 The proof of this is the fragment of a letter attached to his "Manuscript Story." 2 Mrs. Dickinson says that Spaulding was principal of an academy at Cherry Valley, New York. ("New Light on Mormonism," p 13.) His brother John says, however, that he went into the mercantile business in that place with his brother Josiah. 3 Some say in the year 1808. a party of Romans who, in the time of Constantine, in a voyage to Britain, were driven from their course by contrary winds and were thrown upon our Atlantic coast. Making their way inland, they came in contact with two native tribes, the Sciotans and Kentucks, who are described as living, respectively, north and south of the Ohio River. This story is the purported history of these aboriginal tribes, giving an account of their customs, habits, manner of government and wars. Its author was a Roman by the name of Fabius, who is represented as writing it on twenty-eight rolls of parchment in the Latin language and afterward depositing it in an artificial cave near Conneaut, where Spaulding claims that he discovered it. It was never finished, for it ends abruptly. Spaulding gave as his reason for throwing it aside that he wished to go further back in his dates and write in the old Scriptural style, that his story might appear more ancient -- a wish that was afterwards accomplished in his "Manuscript Found," from which, it is claimed, the Book of Mormon has been revamped. After Spaulding's death, his widow removed to the home of her brother, W. H. Sabine, of Onondaga Valley, New York. Among the things that she carried with her was an old, "hair-covered trunk" which contained the sermons, essays and a "single manuscript" of her deceased husband. In 1820, Mrs. Spaulding married a Mr. Davison, of Hartwick, New York, and took the trunk to that place with her. Her daughter, Matilda Spaulding, was married to Dr. A. McKinstry in 1828, and removed to Monson, Hampden County, Massachusetts, where her mother followed her soon afterwards and where she spent the remainder of her life. When Mrs. Davison removed from Hartwick, the trunk spoken of was left in the care of her cousin, Mr. Jerome Clark, of that place. Leaving the Spauldings for the present, we return to Conneaut, Ohio. In 1832 or 1833, a "woman preacher" came to that place and read copious extracts from the Book of Mormon before a congregation composed, in part, of Spaulding's relatives and old acquaintances. The book was immediately recognized by Spaulding' s brother and others as a plagiarism of the "Manuscript Found," and considerable indignation was manifested that it should have been put to so unholy a use as to be transformed into a new Bible. The excitement was so intense that a citizens' meeting was called, and Dr. Philastrus [sic] Hurlburt, who had been a Mormon, but who had been cut off from the church, Mormons say, for immorality, was deputed to visit Mrs. Davison and secure, if possible, the "Manuscript Found," that it might be compared with the Book of Mormon and the fraud be exposed. Hurlburt went, first, to Onondaga Valley, New York, where he secured the recommendation of Mr. Sabine, Mrs. Davison's brother, and from there to Monson, Massachusetts, where he met Mrs. Davison herself. At first this lady declined to give her consent to let the writings of her former husband pass out of her possession, but upon receiving Hurlburt's solemn promise that the manuscript he was seeking would be returned, she reluctantly acceded, and Hurlburt went to Hartwick and obtained from the old trunk in Mr. Clark's possession the "single manuscript" which it contained, and which at that time was supposed to be the "Manuscript Found." Hurlburt then returned to Ohio and delivered the manuscript, with other matter which he had collected, to a Mr. E. D. Howe, editor of the Painesville Telegraph, who was then engaged in writing his book, "Mormonism Unveiled." But, when this gentleman examined the manuscript, he discovered that it was not the "Manuscript Found" at all, but Spaulding's first story, entitled "Manuscript Story -- Conneaut Creek." He also afterwards exhibited it to the old acquaintances of Spaulding, who immediately recognized it as his work, but who declared that it was not the "Manuscript Found," but another manuscript written earlier. This romance was not returned to Mrs. Davison, as had been agreed upon, and was soon lost track of. Howe declared that it had been destroyed by fire, while the Spauldings accused Hurlburt of having sold it to the Mormons. But neither of these explanations of its disappearance proved true. In 1839-40, Howe sold his printing establishment to a Mr. L. L. Rice, who, with a partner, began publishing an antislavery newspaper. Rice subsequently sold out and removed to Honolulu, Sandwich Islands, where, in 1884, he accidentally discovered this manuscript in his possession, it having been inadvertently transferred to him by Howe, among other things, when he bought out his printing establishment. Soon after its discovery, this manuscript was placed in the library of Oberlin College, Ohio, where it still remains. Both of the Mormon Churches have made copies of it, which they publish under the erroneous title, "Manuscript Found." THE FAIRCHILD -- RICE -- SMITH CORRESPONDENCE. With the finding of the Honolulu manuscript, interest in the question of the origin of the Book of Mormon was re-aroused, and papers and magazines throughout the country heralded the news of the new find and discussed its probable bearing upon the traditional theory, so long held, of the origin of the Book of Mormon in the Spaulding Romance. Pres. J. H. Fairchild, of Oberlin College,having been in Honolulu at the time of the discovery of this manuscript, wrote a brief note in regard to the same for the Bibliotheca Sacra, which was widely copied by papers and magazines 1 throughout the country. This note, with three letters from the pen of Mr. L. L. Rice, the finder, appear in the preface to the Josephite edition of this manuscript. The note is as follows: The theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon in the traditional manuscript of Solomon Spaulding, will probably have to be relinquished. That manuscript is doubtless now in the possession of Mr. L. L. Rice, of Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, formerly an anti-slavery editor in Ohio, and for many years State Printer at Columbus. During a recent visit to Honolulu, I suggested to Mr. Rice that he might have valuable anti-slavery documents in his possession, which he would be willing to contribute to the rich collection already in the Oberlin College Library. In pursuance of this suggestion, Mr. Rice began looking over his old pamphlets and papers, and at length came upon on old, worn and faded manuscript of about one hundred and seventy-five pages, small quarto, purporting to be a history of the migrations and conflicts of the ancient Indian Tribes, which occupied the territory now belonging to the States of New York, Ohio and Kentucky. On the last page of this manuscript is a certificate 2 and signature, giving the names of several persons known to the signer, who have assured him that to their personal knowledge the manuscript was the writing of Solomon Spaulding. Mr. Rice has no recollection how or when this manuscript came into his possession. It was enveloped it, a coarse piece of wrapping paper, and endorsed in Mr. Rice's hand-writing, "A Manuscript Story."____________ 1 Grinnell (Iowa) Herald; Western Watchman, Eureka, California; New York Observer, Frank Leslie's Sunday Magazine, etc. 2 "The Writings of Sollomon Spaulding Proved by Aron Wright, Oliver Smith, John N. Miller & others. The testimonies of the above gentlemen are now in my possession. (Signed) D. P. Hurlburt." common to the two. The solemn style of the Book of Mormon, in imitation of the English Scriptures, does not appear in the manuscript. The only resemblance is in the fact that both profess to set forth the history of lost tribes. Some other explanation of the origin of the Book of Mormon must be found, if any explanation is required. The three letters of Mr. Rice I now give, reserving my comments on the same, as I also shall on the note of President Fairchild, until their close: HONOLULU, Sandwich Islands, March 18, 1885.____________ 1 President of the Reorganized Church. be a relative of Spaulding, and who is getting up a book to show that he was the real author of the Book of Mormon; wants it. She thinks, at least, it should be sent to Spaulding's daughter, a Mrs. Somebody -- but she does not inform me where she lives. Deming says that Howe borrowed it when he was getting up his book, and did not return it, as he should have done, &c. is but a feeble imitation of the other. Finally, I am more than half convinced that this is his only writing of the sort, and that any pretense that Spaulding was in any sense the author of the other, is a sheer fabrication. It was easy for any body who may have seen this, or heard anything of its contents, to get up the story that they were identical. L. L. R. a central place, in the vicinity of Conneaut, where the manuscript was written. the author of the Book of Mormon, I do not attempt to decide. It devolves upon their opponents to show that there are or were other writings of Spalding -- since it is evident that this writing is not the original of the Mormon Bible. Having put before the reader the foregoing correspondence, I now invite his attention to a brief, critical examination of the same. First, the manuscript described is not the "Manuscript Found," from which it is claimed the Book of Mormon was revamped, but an entirely different romance, entitled on the wrapper, "Manuscript Story -- Conneaut Creek." Professor Fairchild says that this title appeared on the wrapper in Mr. Rice's handwriting, but Rice, himself, declares that it was there, "in faint penciling," when it first came into his possession. For a reason that will appear in the next chapter, I believe that it was on the wrapper long before it fell into the hands of Dr. Hurlburt. Secondly, Professor Fairchild seems not to have fully understood, at this time, the Spaulding manuscript theory. He speaks of this manuscript as "the long-lost story," wholly unmindful of the fact that, fifty years before, Howe, in his "Mormonism Unveiled," had given a paragraph outline of it and had declared that he had submitted it to the acquaintances of Spaulding, who had admitted that the latter was its author, but who had expressly denied that it was the "Manuscript Found." It is, therefore, not "the long-lost story" at all, but a totally different story, written earlier and bearing no more relation to the "Manuscript Found" than Longfellow's "Evangeline" bears to his "Hiawatha." The difference in style between this manuscript and the Book of Mormon is explained by the statement of Spaulding, when he threw it aside, that he intended to change the style and go further back in his dates that his story might appear more ancient. Thirdly, Mr. Rice, in denying that the "Manuscript Story" was in any sense the basis of the Book of Mormon, admits the contention of nearly all learned anti-Mormon polemics, both before and since his time, that another manuscript of Spaulding's might have formed such a basis. He says: It is certain that this Manuscript is not the origin of the Mormon Bible, whatever some other manuscript may have been.And: But that would not settle the claim that some other manuscript of Spaulding was the original of it. Fourthly, Professor Fairchild, in October, 1900, so far changed his sentiments expressed sixteen years before, that he admitted the same contention. In the month mentioned, and shortly before his death, he signed the following statement in the presence of Rev. J. D. Nutting:
With this last statement, Professor Fairchild nullifies the wrong inferences which have been drawn from his first declaration, and swings into line with the position generally assumed by intelligent anti-Mormon polemics, that there was another manuscript, different from the one found in Honolulu, which became the basis of the Book of Mormon. A MORMON LIE NAILED. In the preface to the copy of the Honolulu manuscript, as published by the Reorganized Mormon Church, I find the following false and misleading statement:Herewith we present to the reader the notorious "Manuscript Story" ("Manuscript Found")1 of the late Rev. Solomon Spalding. What gives this document prominence is the fact that, for the past fifty years, it has been made to do duty by the opposers of the Book of Mormon and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, as the source, the root, and the inspiration, by and from which Joseph Smith and Sydney Rigdon wrote said Book of Mormon and organized said Church . . .It would be difficult to find, among all that has been written upon this subject, a more false, misleading and ____________ 1 Notice that the title, "Manuscript Found," appears in parentheses. It is not to he found on the manuscript anywhere, and it is wholly a gratuitous assumption to call the latter the "Manuscript Found." incorrect statement than the foregoing, How an intelligent and honest writer could have penned these words, in the face of what Howe, Hurlburt, Bennett and Braden had written prior to this time to the contrary, is inexplicable. The "Manuscript Story" was never "made to do duty by the opposers of the Book of Mormon and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, as the source, the root, and the inspiration, by and from which Joseph Smith and Sydney Rigdon wrote said Book of Mormon and organized said Church." From 1834 it was expressly denied that this manuscript had anything to do with the Book of Mormon or that it was the "Manuscript Found." 1 A paragraph review of it was given in Howe's book in 1834, and the contents of it were well known and employed in public discussion 2 before the manuscript, itself, was found in 1884. The writer of the foregoing could not have been ignorant of these facts; they were to be found in the books widely known of and read among the members of his church. 3 In 1834, Howe wrote as follows of the "Manuscript Story": The trunk referred to by the widow was subsequently examined and found to contain only a single MS. book, in Spalding's handwriting, containing about one quire of paper. This is a romance, purporting to have been translated from the____________ 1 "Disbelievers in Joseph Smith's "find" have never claimed that the Book of Mormon was a plagiarism of the Oberlin manuscript, and all the powder used by the Mormons on that subject is a wasted explosive." -- Stanton's "The Three Movements" p. 43. 2 See the "Braden-Kelley Debate," p. 91. 3 The Mormons well knew the contents of the "Manuscript Story" long before it was found in Honolulu, and Reynolds, in his "Myth of the Manuscript Found," p. 51 (1883), gives the outline of it. Then, in the face of the fact that Howe, Bennett and other anti-Mormons, following the Conneaut testimonies about to be given, claimed that the "Manuscript Found" was a Jewish romance, how could he honestly assert that they claimed that the Book of Mormon came from the former? There has been some pretty hard Mormon lying all along the line. Latin, found on twenty-four rolls of parchment, in a cave, on the banks of Conneaut Creek, but written in modern style, and giving a fabulous account of a ship's being driven upon the American coast, while proceeding from Rome to Britain, a short time previous to the Christian era, this country then being inhabited by the Indians, This old MS. has been shown to several of the foregoing witnesses, who recognize it as Spaulding's, he having told them that he had altered his first plan of writing, by going farther back with dates, and writing in the old Scripture style, in order that it might appear more ancient They say that it bears no resemblance to the "Manuscript Found."This is the first description ever given in print of this "Manuscript Story" which was afterwards found in the possession of Mr. Rice, of Honolulu. And Howe here disclaims that it was the "Manuscript Found," hence that it was the basis of the Book of Mormon. Yet, in the face of this fact, we are coolly told that this manuscript has been made to do service "as the source, the root, and the inspiration, by and from which Joseph Smith and Sydney Rigdon wrote said Book of Mormon and organized said Church"! This same statement appeared again in the second edition of Howe's book of 1840, and in Bennett's "Mormonism Exposed" of 1842. Howe, again, in 1881, disclaimed any connection or resemblance, whatever, between the "Manuscript Story" and the "Manuscript Found." In a letter, addressed to Elder T. W. Smith, an apostle of the Reorganized Church, he says:
between the Chicagoes and Eries, as I now recollect 1 -- not in Bible style -- but purely modern. Dr. Hurlburt, also, bears testimony to the fact that the manuscript which he obtained from Mrs. Davison, and which is now in Oberlin College Library, is not the "Manuscript Found." In a statement issued at Gibsonburg, Ohio, January 10, 1881, he says: To all whom it may concern:____________ 1 Notice Howe saying, "As I now recollect." He is mistaken in regard to the tribes mentioned. They were not the Chicagoes and the Eries, but the Sciotans and Kentucks. nothing of the kind, but being a manuscript upon all entirely different subject. This manuscript I left with E. D. Howe, of Painesville, Geauga county, Ohio, now Lake county, Ohio, with the understanding that when he had examined it he should return it to the widow. Said Howe says the manuscript was destroyed by fire, and further the deponent saith not. The manuscript, then, which Hurlburt obtained from Mrs. Davison, was not the "Manuscript Found," from which it is claimed the Book of Mormon was taken, but was "upon an entirely different subject." The same distinction between the manuscripts was also made by Clark Braden in the celebrated Braden-Kelley debate, held at Kirtland, Ohio, in 1884, a short time before the Honolulu manuscript came to light. 1 Reader, when the Mormon elder, who comes to your door with his literature, tells you that the "Manuscript Found," from which it is claimed the Book of Mormon was taken, was discovered in Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, in 1884, and that they now have it in printed form for twenty-five cents per copy, don't you believe it. The manuscript from Honolulu is not the "Manuscript Found," but the "Manuscript Story;" the former may be found, revamped, as the Book of Mormon, at the publishing-houses of the Brighamite and Josephite Mormon Churches, ____________ 1 See "Braden-Kelley Debate" (first ed.), p. 75. |
THE BOOK OF MORMON
155
While I am forced by the logic of the evidence to take the latter view, I believe that Solomon Spaulding incorporated in his "Manuscript Found" some of the features which first appeared in his "Manuscript Story," and that these, notwithstanding the undoubted thorough revision of Sidney Rigdon, have come down to us and appear in the Book of Mormon. It is my purpose in the present chapter to point out these points of resemblance and to weave them into my fabric accumulative evidence to support the general position that I have taken that the author of the "Manuscript Story" was the author of the basis of the Book of Mormon. Before making my quotations from the "Manuscript Story," it will be necessary for me to explain the peculiar markings that occur. As the original manuscript stands, it is full of erasures and mistakes of various kinds. 1 In order to represent these, so that the reader can have the work in print just as it appears in manuscript, it was found necessary by the publishers to invent a system of marking. In this system, those words and sentences which are underlined are stricken out in the original, while those places marked thus -- -- -- -- are illegible. With this explanation, I shall give my quotations' from this manuscript just as they appear in the copy of the original as published by the Reorganized Church. My quotations from the Book of Mormon will also be taken from their reprint of the third American edition of that Book. BOTH FOUND UNDER A STONE. Both the "Manuscript Story" and the Book of Mormon are said to have been found under a stone, which stone was raised with a lever in the hands of the finder. Spaulding gives the following account of the reputed finding of the first:Near the west Bank of the Coneaught River there are the remains of an ancient fort. As I was walking and forming various conjectures respecting the character situation & numbers of those people who far exceeded the present Indians in works of art and inginuety, I hapned. to tread on a flat stone. This was at a small distance from the fort, & it lay on the top of a great small mound of Earth exactly horizontal. The face of it had a singular appearance. I discovered a number of characters, which appeared to me to be letters, but so much effaced by the ravages of time, that I could not read the inscription. With the assistance of a leaver I raised the stone. But you may easily____________ 1 These are sometimes held up to prove that Spaulding was not as learned a man as he is supposed to have been, but a careful study of his "Manuscript Story" will show that they are due to pure carelessness. In some instances, he spells a word correctly and in others incorrectly. This was, probably, his first draft, which he never expected any one to see.
THE BOOK OF MORMON
157
conjecture my astonishment when I discovered that its ends and sides rested on stones & that it was designed as a cover to an artificial Cave. I found by examining that its sides were lined with stones built in a conical form with --- --- --- --- --- down, & that it was about eight feet deep. -- M. S., p. 11.After giving a description of this cave, Spaulding continues: Observing one side (of the cave, C. A. S.) to he perpendicular nearly three feet from the bottom, I began to inspect that part with accuracy. Here I noticed a big flat stone fixed in the form of a doar. I immediately tore it down and Lo, a cavity within the wall presented itself it being about three feet in diamiter from side to side and about two feet high. Within this cavity I found an earthen Box with a cover which shut it perfectly tite. The Box was two feet in length one & half in breadth & one & three inches in diameter. My mind filled with awful sensations which crowded fast upon me would hardly permit my hands to remove this venerable deposit, but curiosity soon gained the assendency & the box was taken & raised to open it. When I had removed the Cover I found that it contained twenty-eight rolls of parchment -- & -- that when -- -- -- appeared to be manuscrips written in eligant hand with Roman Letters & in the Latin Language. -- M. S., p. 12.This is Spaulding's fictitious account of the finding of the "Manuscript Story." Now let us read Joseph Smith's description of the finding of the Mormon plates: Convenient to the village of Manchester, Ontario County, New York, stands a hill of considerable size, and the most elevated of any in the neighborhood. On the west side of this hill, not far from the top, under a stone of considerable size, lay the plates deposited in a stone box. This stone was thick and rounding in the middle on the upper side, and thinner toward the edges, so that the middle part of it was visible above the ground, but the edge all around was coveted with earth. Having removed the earth and obtained It lever which I got fixed under the edge of the stone and with a little exertion raised it up, I looked in and there indeed did I behold the plates, the Urim and Thummim, and the Breastplate, as stated by the messenger. The box in which they lay was formed by laying: stones together in some kind of cement; in the bottom of the box, were laid two stones crossways of the box, and on these stones lay the plates and the other things with them.-- Church History, Vol I., p. 16.Spaulding claimed to find his manuscripts under a flat stone, which he raised with a lever, and in an earthen box. Smith claimed to find his plates under a stone, which was thick in the middle, but thin at the edges, and which he raised with a lever, and in a stone box. Spaulding represents himself as accidentally discovering his records; Smith declares that the depository of his was revealed to him by the angel Moroni. A GREAT STORM AT SEA. The "Manuscript Story" and the Book of Mormon both agree in describing a great storm at sea during the voyage which brought the people they describe from the Old World to the New. The former says:One day he (Constantine, C. A. S.) says to me Fabius you must go to Brittian & carry an important -- -- -- -- to the general of our army there -- -- -- -- sail in a vessel & return when she returns. Preparation was made instantly and we sailed -- -- -- The vessel laden with provisions for the army -- -- -- Cloath knives and other implements for their use had now arived neat the coasts of Britain when a tremendous storm arose & drove us into the midst of the boundless Ocean. Soon the whole crew became lost & bewildered. They knew not the direction for to the rising: Sun or polar Star, for the heavens were covered with clouds; & darkness had spread her sable mantle over the face of the raging deep. Their minds were filled with consternation and despair. & unanimously agreed that What could we do? How be extrecated from the insatiabte jaws of a watry tomb. Then it was that we felt our absolute dependence on that Almighty & gracious Being who holds the winds & floods in -- -- -- hands. From him alone could we expect deliverance. To him our most fervent desires assended. Prostrate & on bended nees we poured forth incessant Supplication & even Old Ocean appeared to sympathize in our distress by returning the echo of our vociferous Cries & lamentations. After being driven five days with incridable velocity before the furious wind the storm abated in its violence. -- M. S., p. 15.The Book of Mormon account of a similar storm is as follows: And it came to pass that after they (Laman and Lemuel, C. A. S.) had bound me (Nephi, C. A. S.), insomuch that I could not move, the compass, which had been prepared of the Lord, did cease to work; wherefore, they knew not whither they should steer the ship, insomuch, that there arose a great storm, yea, a great and terrible tempest; and we were driven back upon the waters for the space of three days; and they began to be frightened exceedingly lest they should be drowned in the sea: nevertheless they did not loose me. And on the fourth day which we had been driven back, the tempest began to be exceeding sore.In both accounts, the storm which occurred ceased in answer to prayer. THE GREAT SPIRIT. Both records declare that the ancient Americans believed in the Great Spirit. Spaulding gives the following address of an ancient American chieftain:The Speaker then extended his hands & spoke. Hail, ye favorite children of the great and good Spirit, who resides in the Sun who is the father of all living creatures & whose arms encircle us all around. -- M. S., p. 23.In the Book of Mormon, I find King Lamoni saying this: Behold, is not this the Great Spirit who doth send such great punishments upon this people, because of their murders? -- B. of M., p. 253.And Ammon is represented as asking King Lamoni: Believest thou that there is a Great Spirit? And he said Yea. And Ammon said, This is God. -- B. of M., p. 255.This appellation stamps both books as a fraud, for it is now conceded by all of the leading students of the ancient American religions that the American Indian knew nothing whatever of the "Great Spirit" until he heard of him through the white missionary. The native terms for God do not express the idea of personality, but simply of the supernatural in general, the mysterious, the incomprehensible, the unknown. 1 Maj. J. W. Powell, former chief of the Smithsonian Institution, says: Nations with civilized institutions, art with palaces, monotheism as the worship of the Great Spirit, all vanish from the priscan condition of North America in the light of anthropologic research. Tribes with the social institutions of kinship, art with its highest architectural development exhibited in the structure of communal dwellings, and polytheism in the worship of mythic animals and nature-gods remain. -- First Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, p. 69.Mr. F. S. Dellenbaugh, a prominent archeologist, also says: They had no understanding of a single "Great Spirit" till____________ 1 See Chapter VlII. of my "Cumorah Revisited." the Europeans, often unconsciously, informed them of their own belief. --North Americans of Yesterday, p. 375. THE REVOLUTION OF THE EARTH. Fabius, after reaching our shores, reasoned as follows on the revolution of the earth:Whereas, if according to the platonic system, the earth is a globe & the sun is stationary, then the earth by a moderate velocity -- -- -- perform her revolutions. -- M. S., p. 29.In the Book of Mormon, Helaman says: Yea, and if he say unto the earth, Move, it is moved; yea, if he say unto the earth, Thou shalt go back, that it lengthen out the day for many hours, it is done: and thus according to his word, the earth goeth back, and it appeareth unto man that the sun standeth still: yea, and behold, this is so; for sure it is the earth that moveth, and not the sun. -- B. of M., p, 410. THE USE OF THE HORSE. Both the "Manuscript Story" and the Book of Mormon inform us that the ancient Americans made use of the horse. In the first mentioned, I find the following:The ground was plowed by horses & generally made very mellow for the reception of the seed. -- M. S., p. 35.There are a number of references in the Book of Mormon to the use of the horse, but the following will suffice: And it came to pass that the people of Nephi did till the land, and raise all manner of grain, and of fruit, and flocks of herds, and flocks of all manner of cattle, of every kind, and goats, and wild goats, and also many horses. -- B. of M., p. 133.It is now agreed that, while the horse was an inhabitant of America in the earlier geologic epochs, it ceased to exist long before man had attained to any considerable degree of culture as represented in the Book of Mormon. Dr. D. G. Brinton says: There is no doubt but that the horse existed on the continent contemporaneously with post-glacial man; and some paleontologists are of the opinion that the European and Asian horses were descendants of the American species; but for some mysterious reason the genus became extinct in the New World many generations before its discovery. -- The American Race, p. 50. THE MANUFACTURE OF IRON. On the manufacture of iron tools and implements, the "Manuscript Story" says:The manufacturing of lead Iron & lead was understood, but was not carried on to that extent & perfection as in Europe. A small quantity of Iron in proportion to the number of Inhabitants served to supply them with all the implements which custom had made necessary for their use. By hammering & hardening their Iron they would convert it nearly into the consistence of Steal & fit it for the purpose of edged tools. -- M. S., p. 36.In the Book of Mormon, Nephi says: And I did teach my people to build buildings: and to work in all manner of wood, and of iron, and of copper, and of brass, and of steel, and of gold, and of silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance. -- B. of M., p. 64.No fact is better established than that the American race did not use manufactured iron and steel tools before the discovery. Says Prof. Cyrus Thomas, of the Smithsonian Institution: The use of iron as a metal was unknown in America previous to the discovery by Columbus. -- American Archaeology, p. 11. HIGH PRIESTS. On this point, the "Manuscript Story" says:Labamack accepted the office of Emperor & his four counsellor were appointed. Lamban was ordained high Priest & his four assistants chosen. -- M. S., p. 63. On the appointment of the Nephite Alma to such an office, the Book of Mormon says: And it came to pass that Alma was appointed to be the first chief judge; he being also the high priest; his father having conferred the office upon him, and had given him the charge concerning all the affairs of the church. -- B. of M., p. 204.
Hamack then arose & in his hand he held a stone which he pronounced transparent. Thro' this he could view things present & things to come. could behold the dark intrigues & cabals of foreign courts, &The following is a description of the manner in which Joseph Smith is said to have employed the Urim and Thummim, from the pen of David Whitmer, one of the three witnesses, and published in the Chicago Times of August 7, 1875. Let the reader carefully compare this description with the foregoing account from the "Manuscript Story," and then decide for himself whether or not there are good grounds for believing that this feature of the Mormon fraud was first conceived in the mind of the dreamer of Conneaut. Whitmer says: And (I) was an eye-witness to the method of procedure. The plates were not before Joseph while he translated.... The method pursued was common-place, but nevertheless effective. Having placed the Urim and Thummim in his hat, Joseph placed the hat over his face, and with prophetic eyes read the invisible symbols, syllable by syllabic and word by word, while Cowdery or Harris acted as recorders.... So illiterate was Joseph at that time, that he didn't even know that Jerusalem was a walled city, and be was utterly unable to pronounce many of the names which the magic power of the Urim and Thummim revealed, and therefore spelled them out in syllables, and the more erudite scribe put them together. The stone was the same used by the Jaredites at (from) Babel. I have frequently placed it to my eyes, but could see nothing through it. I have seen Joseph, however, place it to his eyes and instantly read signs one hundred and sixty miles distant, and tell exactly what was transpiring there. When I went to Harmony after him, he told me the name of every hotel at which I had stopped on the road, read the signs, and described various scenes without having ever received any information from me. -- Quoted in "Joseph the Seer," p. 72.Hamack could view things present and things to come, dark intrigues and cabals, hidden treasures, amorous practices, and even moles and warts and pimples, through his stone. Joseph could read signs one hundred and sixty miles distant, the names on the hotels, and behold various scenes through which Whitmer passed, through his. Reader, is not this coincidence suspicious, to say the least? 1 I close this chapter with the following verses from the pen of A. O. Hooten, of Bridge, Oregon, in which are summed up the points of identity between the "Manuscript Story" and the Book of Mormon: ____________ 1 See also "Mosiah" 5:10 for a similar stone in use by a Nephite seer. And each of the "records," was very, very old. Solomon's was in "Latin," and written on "parchment, Joseph's "Reformed Egyptian," "engraved" on "plates" of "gold." 'Twas just under a "stone," which he raised by a "lever," That each found his "record," each dry, safe and sound. Solomon's in a "box," in a cave "artificial," Joseph's in a "box," near the surface of the ground. Of each of the "records," only part was "translated," Each one gave his reasons, why a part was reserved. Solomon's was a novel, while Joseph's was "more bible" For many centuries, hidden, miraculously preserved. The "records" each tell us, while parties crossed the ocean, Tremendous storms arose, surging billows everywhere, Yet all were safely landed, and not one life was lost, They were saved from destruction in answer to prayer. Each "record" mentions horses, that were found upon the land, "Burnt offerings" people offered, to cleanse them from all sin, Judges were appointed, that justice might he done, And different peoples, three, this land were dwelling in. Each "translator" must have "planets" that move in regular form. And "Oracles" their words received, as coming from above. "Sacred" writings kept separate, and "characters" used for words The wicked punished for a while, then saved by redeeming love. Each builds his forts of "earth" thrown up with timbers placed on top, Has property held in "common," and counsellors four or two, Has a man whose words, accepted, as coming from above, Just so be calls it "revelation," that's enough to them 'tis true. But the thing that was dearest, to each "translator's" heart, Was the magical "interpreters" or "transparent stone" so clear; With them nothing could he hidden, all things came to view, Moles and pimples, warts and wrinkles, all things far and near, This "missing link" of "evidence" at last completes the chain." 1 Yet Spaulding wrote his "manuscript," before Smith found his "book," And there's nineteen points of identity. Will Mormons please explain? ____________ 1 The preface to the "Manuscript Story" by the Reorganized Church speaks of it as "this hobgoblin of the pulpit, this 'nigger-in-the-woodpile' of the press and the forum," and this "newly found 'missing link'" which completes the chain of evidence." |
THE BOOK OF MORMON
167
of the Book of Mormon in the "Manuscript Found." While these objections possess but little force to those who are familiar with the evidences adduced and the positions taken by the advocates of the Spaulding theory, they are so plausible on the face of them and are so ingeniously presented as often to deceive the superficial and those who have little or no information on the grounds that are really occupied by those who hold to this view. It is for the Purpose of supplying this information, therefore, that this chapter is written. The Mormons have ever taken full advantage of the confusion that arises over the forced identification of the "Manuscript Found" with the "Manuscript Story," and in some instances they have applied the descriptions of the one to the other, and vice versa, and by so doing have produced a mass of apparent contradictions, inconsistencies and absurdities that is both ludicrous and disgusting. It is only when the distinction between the two manuscripts is clearly fixed in the mind that the investigator is able to work himself out of the fog of Mormon sophistry and misrepresentation and into the sunlight of truth. The true theory of the revamping of the Book of Mormon from the "Manuscript Found" is this: About the year 1809, Solomon Spaulding began an historical novel, based upon the antiquities of America, in which he described the first colonists as coming to our shores from Jerusalem under the leadership of Lehi and Nephi. This novel, which he called the "Manuscript Found," he placed in the printing establishment of Robert Patterson, of Pittsburgh, from which it was stolen by Sidney Rigdon in 1815 or 1816. Rigdon afterwards rewrote this manuscript, retaining only the historical outline, proper names and certain Scriptural expressions, but adding a large amount of religious matter and clothing the whole in his own style and manner of expression, after which he put it in the hands of Joseph Smith, a young "money-digger" of western New York, about the year 1827, who, in turn, read it off from behind a sheet to another accomplice, Oliver Cowdery, who wrote it clown as it fell from his lips and got it in shape for the printer. I believe this to be the theory of the revamping of the Spaulding story as it would be stated by the majority, at least, of those who advocate it. No one claims that the historical part of the Book of Mormon is just as Spaulding wrote it, word for word. The whole thing was rewritten by Rigdon, who retained from the original only the outline, the proper names and certain Scriptural expressions. With this explanation, let us now take up the objections that have been offered, and give them a fair, candid and careful examination. THE SIZE OF THE BOOK OF MORMON. It is objected that the "Manuscript Found" could not have been the basis of the Book of Mormon, for the reason that it was too meager a thing to make a book the size of the latter. Eider E. L. Kelley says:The manuscript Spaulding is said to have written was too meager a thing to in any sense compare with a manuscript that would make a book the size of the Book of Mormon. -- Braden, and Kelley Debate (first ed.), p. 80.Further on he adds: Taking up the first reason, it will at once be clear to you that a manuscript written in the English language, as they concede Spaulding's was, to contain the amount of matter that is included in the strictly historical part of the Book of Mormon, would cover at least fifteen hundred pages of foolscap paper. Was the "Manuscript Found" such? The statements of those who claim they saw the "Manuscript Found," place it beyond doubt that it was no such. Mrs. McKinstry, the daughter of Solomon Spaulding, in her evidence, says, that she, "Read the manuscript frequently when she was about twelve years of age, and that it was about one inch in thickness." She read it frequently, so it could not have been very large. Then their other trumped up witnesses all, or nearly all, say they heard it read. Henry Lake heard it read, John N. Miller heard it read from beginning to end. Aaron Wright heard Spaulding read it, etc. Mrs. Matilda Spaulding, wife of Solomon Spaulding, states in her testimony published in the Illinois Quincy Whig, that it was about a third as large as the Book of Mormon and that her daughter (Mrs. McKinstry) read it frequently. Hurlburt who was commissioned by Henry Lake, John Miller, Aaron Wright, et al. (Braden's witnesses), to go and get the Spaulding writing, went and got it he says, and the only one in Spaulding's handwriting which the widow had. That he delivered it to E. D. Howe of Painesville, who was writing the book to break down the Mormons, and Howe says, page 288, of his book in describing it, that, "The trunk referred to by the widow was subsequently examined and found to contain only a single manuscript book in Spaulding's handwriting, containing about one quire of paper."The above is confusion confounded. It is an instance of flagrantly jumbling the two manuscripts together in order to produce an effect of absurdity and inconsistency. The manuscript which Mesdames Davison and McKinstry describe could not have been the "Manuscript Found" at all, but was the "Manuscript Story." The former was never in the "old hair trunk" after Spaulding's death, for the reason that it was in the hands of Rigdon. These ladies, as we have already shown, were mistaken, for the manuscript they describe has been traced from the old trunk to Hurlburt, from Hurlburt to Howe, from Howe to Rice and from Rice to the Oberlin College Library, and the only title that it bears is "Manuscript Story -- Conneaut Creek," and this "in faint penciling," while it is profoundly different from the "Manuscript Found" as this is described by John Spaulding, Henry Lake and the others. Again, what if the original "Manuscript Found" was a much shorter work than the Book of Mormon? How does this prove that it could not have been the basis of the latter? Mr. Kelley's statement that the historical part of the Book of Mormon alone "would cover at least fifteen hundred pages of foolscap paper," is away wide of the mark. By a test which I have made, I have found that the whole Book of Mormon, historical part and all, can be easily written upon twelve hundred pages. Another fact is that about three-fourths of the book is religious matter, and we contend that this was the work of Rigdon. This would leave, by a fair estimate, about three hundred pages for the historical part, written just as it is, and if this were reduced to a consistent size by the omission of redundant and superfluous language, repetitions, etc., Rigdon's overdress, it would fill a space in print at most one-eighth the size of the Book of Mormon. So the statements of Lake, Miller and Wright, concerning the size of Spaulding's "Manuscript Found," may be correct after all. THE STYLE OF THE BOOK OF MORMON. I. It is claimed that the historical and doctrinal parts of the Book of Mormon are so closely interwoven that they could not have been the work of two independent writers. Elder J. R. Lambert says:The historical and doctrinal parts are so closely blended and interwoven, throughout the book, that it is evident that whoever wrote all or any part of the history contained in the book, also wrote the doctrine presented with it. -- Objections to the Book of Mormon Answered and Refuted, p. 76.But Mr. Lambert proceeds to reason upon the grounds, which we have already denied, that his opponents hold to the view that the historical part of the Book of Mormon is verbally the work of Spaulding. I feel sure that no anti-Mormon writer, who has given the matter due consideration, holds to any such theory. All that we claim is that Rigdon took the historical outline, proper names and certain Scriptural expressions from the "Manuscript Found," and clothed them in his own particular literary style, and presented them to the world as the Book of Mormon. This would not have been an impossible feat, for it is done every day in our public schools, the scholars reproducing in their own language the thoughts of another. This is what we claim Rigdon did. 2. Again, it is objected that the style of the Book of Mormon is altogether too common for a man of the education and literary ability of Solomon Spaulding. 1 Elder W. W. Blair writes: That any one of judgment, on reading the book, could for one moment think that Rev. Mr. Spaulding, commonly reputed to he a man of poetic nature, romantic tastes and high scholastic attainments, ever wrote the book, or even one page of it, is more than we can believe. Had he, or any man of finished education, written the book, their scholarly attainments would have been manifest in the style, language and arrangement of the book. -- Joseph the Seer, p. 174.____________ 1 When it is to the advantage of the Mormons, Spaulding's ability is run up, and when not to their advantage to run it up, it is run down. Right in this same connection, Blair says: "Whoever will read the 'Manuscript Story' written by Rev. Spaulding, will perceive that he had neither the religion, the morals, the information, nor the intellectual ability, to write the Book of Mormon, nor anything to compare with it" (p. 175). In the first quotation, the Book of Mormon, as a literary production, is below Spaulding; in this quotation, it is above him. But here, again, Mr. Blair proceeds to argue along the same line as Mr. Lambert, and assumes that his opponents hold that the Book of Mormon, or at least the historical part of it, is just as it came from Spaulding's pen without being worked over. I say that no such theory would, for a moment, be held by any anti-Mormon polemic who would give the subject the consideration that it deserves. While the outline, proper names and a few Scriptural expressions, as "And it came to pass," etc., are undoubtedly Spaulding's, the dress, with its frills and flounces of verbosity, redundancy and repetition, comes from the dressmaking establishment of Sidney Rigdon. 3. It is further objected that the Book of Mormon is not written either in the style of Rigdon or that of Smith, hence that it must have come from a higher source and must be divine. On this point, Elder George Reynolds says: It is not written in the language of either Joseph Smith or Sidney Rigdon. If we compare the revelations given through Joseph Smith at the time the plates were being translated, we find an altogether different diction; or let us compare it with the Lectures on Faith in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants and then with the acknowledged writings of Sidney Rigdon, and we shall find there is nothing common in any of these with the peculiarities of grammatical construction and verbal idiosyncrasies of the Book of Mormon. -- Myth of the Manuscript Found, pp. 38, 39.But I am not so sure of this. In some respects the style of the Book of Mormon may differ from the style of Smith's revelations, the difference being due to the respective character of each, one being mainly historic, the other mainly prophetic. But, how about Rigdon? His style is described to have been "eloquent" and "enthusiastic," just such a style as would abound in verbosity and redundancy of speech.1 Besides being a backwoods preacher of those times when revival excitement ran high, he undoubtedly employed the hackneyed expressions of the backwoods revivalist. Such Book of Mormon expressions; therefore, as "everlastingly too late," "did sing redeeming love," "experienced a change of heart" and "lay down the weapons of your rebellion," strongly impress us as Rigdonisms, and confine the production of the Book of Mormon to that period in the world's history when such expressions were in common use. THE CHARACTER OF THE BOOK OF MORMON. The doctrinal character of the Book of Mormon is made a further objection to its Spaulding authorship, it being claimed that it smacks more of "Campbellism" than it does of Presbyterianism.The doctrinal portions of the Book of Mormon are not those that one would expect from a retired clergyman of the Presbyterian school. They begin with the history and are intimately interwoven, with it from first to last; and some of the cardinal features of the Presbyterian Confession of Faith are discarded. A Baptist writer, Professor Whitsitt, in a lecture delivered before a Baptist Pastors' Conference, and published in the Western Recorder, takes the ground that the Book of Mormon was written in the direct interest of the Campbellites and in support of their confession of faith, that "Jesus is the Christ." -- Joseph Smith, in "The Spaulding Story Re-examined," p. 13.But it has never been claimed that Spaulding's romance ____________ 1 Hayden says of Rigdon: "His action was graceful, his language copious, fluent in utterance, with articulation clear and musical." -- History of the Disciples, p. 192. was a religious romance. It was purely an historical account of a fictitious people, and to this all of his relatives and acquaintances agree. The religious part was added by Sidney Rigdon, who, from 1824 to 1830, was a co-laborer with Alexander Campbell, Walter Scott and Adamson Bentley, in the great Restoration movement, hence the points of "Campbellism," so-called, which appear. Another thing to be taken into consideration is that Solomon Spaulding, at this time, was neither a Presbyterian nor a "Campbellite," but a skeptic, and so if he had any religious views at all, they must have been antagonistic to Christianity. All that the religious character of the Book of Mormon proves is that it was revamped from the "Manuscript Found" after Rigdon had become familiar with the doctrine of baptism for the remission of sins and other points of theology as held by the Campbells. SMITH'S INABILITY TO PRODUCE THE BOOK OF MORMON. It is denied that Joseph Smith could, in any way, have produced the Book of Mormon, and, as it was above his ability, it is claimed that it must have come from God. Mr. Blair says:That Joseph Smith, without the inspiration of God, could write that book, abounding as it does in the most accurate items of history, declaring improbable historical facts, facts which have since been fully attested by the antiquarian and the geologist; disseminating a system of morals and religion that challenges the criticism, and that is worthy of the admiration of the race and publishing a series of prophecies the most important and startling, many of which are being fulfilled under our own observation -- that he could do such a work, under such conditions, it would be far more difficult to believe, than to believe what he claims, viz., the guidance and inspiration of God. -- Joseph the Seer, p. 175.Let us, to start with, take a look at the remarkable things which Mr. Blair refers to as proof that Smith was under the guidance and inspiration of God. In the first place, it is claimed that he produced a book which abounds in the most accurate items of history, many of which have since been fully attested by the antiquarian and the geologist. This statement is sufficient to raise a smile. Is a book which says that Christ was to be "born at Jerusalem" (Alma 5:2) historically accurate? And is a book which stands in open conflict with the great facts pertaining to the ancient inhabitants of America, as revealed by archaeological research, to be trusted as coming from God? I have proved conclusively a score or more of connections between the Book of Mormon and archaeological science, 1 and yet we repeatedly hear, in spite of these proofs to the contrary, that the claims of the Book of Mormon have been fully confirmed "by the antiquarian and the geologist"! As for the morality of the Book of Mormon, it proves nothing as to its inspiration. Thousands of books teach good morals without being inspired. Such books as "Pilgrim's Progress," by Bunyan; "In His Steps," by Sheldon, and "What a Young Man Ought to Know," by Stall, are morally uplifting to a greater degree than the Book of Mormon, and yet their authors would hoot at the suggestion that they were inspired to write them. The moral light which shines from the pages of the Book of Mormon is reflected from the Bible. It has not given the world a single moral truth that it did not have in the Christian Scriptures before it appeared. Lastly, Smith's prophecies or revelations are decidedly weak in proving that he was under the guidance and inspiration of God. The honest and virtuous mind can ____________ 1 See my "Cumorah Revisited." have but little confidence in a prophet whose guiding spirit speaks of an individual as "my servant John C. Bennett," and promises to accept his work if he continues (Doc. and Cov., 107:6), when, at the same time, he was "a very mean man" and a wife deserter, having "a wife and two or three children in McConnelsville, Morgan County, Ohio" (Church History, Vol. II., p. 585). Either the Mormon god connived at wife desertion in defiance of Matt. 19:5, or else he was ignorant in 1841 of what Bennett did in 1838. So, whether you take up the Book of Mormon as a history or a code of morals, or consider the prophecies of Joseph Smith, you will find nothing so remarkable that it would be above the ability of the "Gold Bible Company." But, turning now to the real part which Smith played in the imposture, we find that it would not require more than a young man of his age and education, and of that time, was able to perform. His sole work was, first, to play the prophet, and, secondly, to read off to Cowdery, from behind the sheet, "syllable by syllable and word by word," what Rigdon had already written down. And this he did, according to Whitmer, in a most bungling manner, having to spell some of the words out, letter by letter. To claim that he had to be inspired for such a procedure, is an insult to common sense. THE CHALLENGE TO PRODUCE THE MANUSCRIPT. But perhaps the flimsiest objection that has ever been raised against this theory is that the opponents of the Book of Mormon have never been able to produce the manuscript which they claim was its original, hence that this manuscript never existed. As early as 1839, Parley P. Pratt, through the New York Era, tauntingly said:Now if there is such a manuscript in existence, let it comb forward at once and not he kept in the dark.In throwing out this challenge, Pratt knew perfectly well that he was safe, and every Mormon knows the same in issuing the same challenge to-day, for the "Gold Bible Company" would have had a smaller degree of common sense than we give them credit for if, after this manuscript had served its purpose, they had carelessly let it lie around to fall into Gentile hands and thus expose their fraud. It is not strange that Mormons would take advantage of such an objection, and grasp at it as a drowning man would at a straw, in order to save their failing cause, but the incomprehensible thing is that some anti-Mormon writers, who have rejected the Spaulding theory, have also thrown out this challenge to the members of their own party, and at the inability of the latter to produce the manuscript have derisively declared that "the entire theory connecting Sidney Rigdon and the Spaulding romance with Joseph Smith in originating the Book of Mormon must be abandoned." Rev. D. H. Bays, who for twenty-seven years was an elder in the Reorganized Church, and who, after his apostasy, wrote his "Doctrines and Dogmas of Mormonism," in a rather caustic letter to A. T. Schroeder, 1 then of Salt Lake City, Utah, and dated at Battle Creek, Michigan, September 7, 1899, demands: If "three manuscripts" ever existed, why not produce the evidence to prove it? Why not induce that library of "over one thousand books and pamphlets" to yield up some of its hidden treasures of knowledge upon this point, and settle this mooted question once for all? Mormonism for more than half a century____________ 1 Mr. Schroeder, later, ably refuted the contentions of Mr. Bays in his "The Origin of the Book of Mormon Re-examined," etc. has been demanding the production of the "Manuscript Found," that it might be compared with the Book of Mormon. -- Josephite "Journal of History," January, 1900, p. 93.He then sums up his arguments against the Spaulding theory in the following astounding propositions: 1. The existence of a second manuscript is assumed, not proved.It is surprising to me now, after once having sided with Mr. Bays in his theory of the Cowdery-Smith origin of the Book of Mormon, that a gentleman, so familiar with the history and evidence of the present controversy, as he claims to have been, should take his stand upon two such baseless propositions as these. First, the existence of Spaulding's "second manuscript" is not assumed, but proved -- proved by the testimony of eleven witnesses, the genuineness of which testimony is admitted both by the Brighamite, Roberts, and the Josephite, Smith. As these gentlemen, and no others, have ever shown that our eleven witnesses lied in the testimonies which it is admitted they gave, these testimonies stand as proving that the "second manuscript" of Spaulding really existed. And yet Bays overlooked this fact! Secondly, how Mr. Bays could say that no proofs have ever been offered to show the "absolute identity" of the names in this "second manuscript" with those in the Book of Mormon, when eight of these admittedly genuine testimonies had been before the world for sixty-six years certifying to this very fact, is also beyond the limits of human understanding. Mr. Bays' whole argument, then, falls in the face of the eleven testimonies which we have already given in Chapters VI. and VII. The demand to produce Spaulding's second manuscript suggests the following illustration: Jones steals a hog from Brown. Eleven of Brown's friends see the hog in Jones' pen and identify it as belonging to Brown. Jones takes the hog to White and they kill and eat it. After the hog is all devoured, Brown has Jones arrested for the crime and introduces his eleven witnesses to prove his guilt. But the justice decides that, as the hog can not be produced, Jones is innocent. Now for the application: Rigdon steals a manuscript from Spaulding and, with Smith's assistance, revamps it into the Book of Mormon, after which he destroys it, as no doubt he did. Eleven witnesses testify to the identity, in historical outline and proper names, of Spaulding's manuscript with the Book of Mormon, but Rev. D. H. Bays and the Mormons demand that, as the Spaulding manuscript can not be produced, the case against Rigdon be dismissed and he be adjudged not guilty! THE CHARACTERS OF HURLBURT AND HOWE. It is charged that the characters of Hurlburt and Howe, who secured the testimonies of eight of the eleven witnesses which we have given, were so corrupt that these testimonies are discredited thereby. Elder E. L. Kelley says:Do you blame me, then, ladies and gentlemen, for stating before you I cannot take as evidence anything that has passed through such hands as Mr. Hurlburt and Howe, unless I have the original statement to compare, or it can be proven outside in some way that these statements that he has been referring to -- but never reading in full to you -- are unaltered and genuine? Here is where he gets his John Spaulding, Martha Spaulding, Henry Lake, John Miller, Aaron Wright, Oliver Smith and Nahum Howard. Do you want me to swallow their contradictory, self-accusing, wholly improbable, malicious falsehoods, rather than accept the truth of God? Could anything pure and immaculate have passed through that sewer of filth and come out worthy of the palate of decent men and women? -- Braden and Kelley Debate (first ed.), pp. 115, 116.The charge that is made against Hurlburt is that he was cut off from the church for immorality, and against Howe, that he was jealous because his wife and sister united with the Mormons. But, suppose that both of these charges are true, how does that affect the testimonies of John Spaulding and the rest, since it is admitted by the highest Mormon authority that these testimonies are genuine? Hurlburt and Howe may have possessed characters as black as midnight, but if the statements they secured were actually made and signed as represented, how has their own individual corruption affected them? With the admissions of genuineness which their own leading men have made, it appears very inconsistent for the Mormon churches to attempt to discredit the Conneaut testimonies by the poor characters of men who never made them. Mr. Kelley did with these testimonies just what all Mormons do and have to do: he issued a blustering denial and brought out no proof to support the same, simply calling them "contradictory, self-accusing, wholly improbable, malicious falsehoods." Let the reader compare this charge with the statements themselves, and he will see how far it is from the truth. As for the accusations against Hurlburt and Howe, they may have been guilty of the things charged and they may not. The policy of Mormonism has always been to attempt to blacken the character of every man who has ever openly and successfully opposed it, Howe's book is, probably, the most important book ever written against Mormonism, as it was the first and contains so much original testimony that stands as a huge mountain in the way of the onward advance of Mormonism. Unable to meet and overthrow this testimony, the Mormons turn and vent their spleen on the devoted heads of its compilers. Other men, also, besides Hurlburt, were guilty of seduction in the Mormon Church, and among them Smith himself, but they were never excommunicated.
SUPPOSED CONTRADICTIONS IN THE "MANUSCRIPT FOUND"
1. It is said that the "Manuscript Found" is declared to have described an idolatrous people instead of a people who worshipped God and obeyed his laws as the Book of Mormon describes. This objection is based upon a question and its answer found in the Haven-Davison interview as published in the Quincy Whig of 1839. Q. Does the manuscript describe an idolatrous or a religious people?But here, again, we have the same old play on Mrs. Davison's mistake of confounding the trunk manuscript with the "Manuscript Found." The former does describe an idolatrous people, the aborigines, but it also describes a Christian colony which came from Rome. The latter described a company of Jews that came from Jerusalem, and, while only incidentally religious, probably represented them as worshipers of their Jehovah. 2. It is objected, further, that, according to the Conneaut testimonies, the "Manuscript Found" described the Jewish colony as the lost tribes of Israel, while the Book of Mormon makes them out to be only of the tribe of Joseph. After giving. on page 46 of his "Myth of the Manuscript Found," the claim that Spaulding's "Manuscript Found" gave an account of the immigration of the lost tribes to America, Reynolds says on page 47: It is well to remark that the Book of Mormon makes but very few references to the ten tribes, and in those few, it directly, plainly and unequivocally states that the American Indians are not the descendants of the ten tribes, and further, that the ten tribes never were in America, or any part of it, during any portion of their existence as a nation. On the other hand, the Book of Mormon as directly informs us from whom the aborigines, or natives of this continent, are descended. This being the case, how is it possible for the two works to be identical?To this objection I reply as follows: The theory of the Book of Mormon is so closely akin to the theory of the origin of the American Indians in the lost tribes, as advocated before and about 1830 by such writers as Adair, Boudinot, Smith and Priest, that it would be very easy for the witnesses, who had not heard the "Manuscript Found" read for twenty years, to confound one with the other. Even to-day we hear intelligent people, some of whom have read the Book of Mormon, un-thoughtedly speak of it as a history of the lost tribes. 1 The important thing is that the writers of both romances have the ancient inhabitants (Israelites) coming from the city of Jerusalem and under the leadership of Lehi and Nephi. ____________ 1 As an example of this common mistake, see "North Americans of Yesterday," p. 403, by Frederick S. Dellenbaugh, an employee of our National Museum and an accomplished archeologist, where he says: "Certain resemblances between the myths of the Amerinds and those of the Israelites increased the belief that the American race is the Lost Tribes. The Mormons specially hold to this opinion. But there is positively no ground for the belief." The Rev. Abner Jackson, in his testimony, says that Spaulding begins "their (Nephites?) departure from Palestine, or Judea, then up through Asia, points out their exposures, hardships and sufferings, also their disputes and quarrels, especially when they built their craft for passing over the straits." This is objected to as being entirely different from the migrational account in the Book of Mormon, which has the Nephites crossing over the Pacific Ocean and landing upon the coast of South America. This objection may be met in several ways: first, it may have been according to the original plot of the "Manuscript Found," as heard read by Jackson, to have the Nephites enter America via Behring Strait, and this feature may have been afterwards changed by Spaulding himself or it may have been changed by Rigdon still later; or, what seems more probable, Jackson, who was a very aged man at the time that he made his statement, may have confused the migrational account in the "Manuscript Found" with the theory, so widely held when he was a boy, that the lost tribes entered America by way of Alaska. The latter was the theory of many investigators at the beginning of the nineteenth century. RECAPITULATION. In conclusion, I wish to sum up the points which I have endeavored to establish in the preceding pages:I. THE "MANUSCRIPT STORY." 1. About 1809, Solomon Spaulding, a retired Congregational or Presbyterian preacher, living at Conneaut, Ohio, wrote a small manuscript which he claimed to have found written in the Latin language on twenty-eight rolls of parchment in an artificial cave on Conneaut Creek and which purported to be the historical account of aparty of Romans who were thrown upon our shores in the time of Constantine the Great. 2. This manuscript he abandoned and placed in an "old hair trunk," which at his death in 1816 was taken to the home of his wife's brother, W. H. Sabine, of Onondaga Valley, New York. 3. In 1820, this trunk, with the manuscript, was removed to Hartwick, New York, where it was later placed in the care of Jerome Clark, a cousin of Mrs. Spaulding, now Mrs. Davison. 4. The manuscript remained in the "old hair trunk" until 1834, when Dr. Hurlburt, from Ohio, with the permission of Mrs. Spaulding-Davison, took it to Painesville, of that State, and turned it over to E. D. Howe, author of "Mormonism Unveiled." 5. It was in the possession of E. D. Howe until 1839 or 1840, when it was inadvertently transferred to L. L. Rice, who bought Howe's printing establishment. Rice took it to Columbus, Ohio, where for years he was the State printer. 6. After this, Rice removed to Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, and, though unaware of it, carried this manuscript with him. In 1884 it was accidentally discovered by him, and later placed in the Oberlin College Library, Oberlin, Ohio. 7. The Mormons have published copies of it, which they erroneously entitle "Manuscript Found." II. "THE "MANUSCRIPT FOUND." 1. In 1809, after he had thrown aside his "Manuscript Story," Spaulding began a new romance in the Scriptural style, which he entitled "Manuscript Found." This romance, which he often read to his neighbors, purported to be the history of a Jewish colony that came toour shores in early times under the leadership of Lehi and Nephi. 2. In 1813, Spaulding removed to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of having this manuscript printed, and placed it in the printing establishment of Robert Patterson. 3. In 1814, Spaulding left Pittsburgh and went to Amity, Pennsylvania, where he died in October, 1816. 4. While Spaulding's relations with Patterson existed, the latter had in his employ a young man by the name of J. Harrison Lambdin, who, in turn, had a friend by the name of Sidney Rigdon, who lived a few miles in the country on his mother's farm, but who frequently lounged around the printing-office. 5. Before Spaulding's death, his manuscript came up missing, and he told two intimate acquaintances, Joseph Miller and Dr. Cephas Dodd, that he suspected Rigdon of the theft. 6. In 1822 or 1823, and again in 1826 or 1827, Rigdon exhibited such a manuscript to Dr. John Winter and Mrs. Amos Dunlap, his wife's niece, which he told the former had been written by a man by the name of Spaulding. 7. Between the years 1826 and 1830 he told Adamson Bentley, Alexander Campbell, Darwin Atwater and Dr. Rosa a number of startling things, among them that a golden book had been dug up in New York which gave an account of the ancient inhabitants of this continent and slated that the Christian religion had been preached here in early times just as it was then being preached by Campbell and his coadjutors. 8. During this time, Rigdon was seen at Palmyra, New York, or vicinity, at three different times: in March, 1827; in the fall of 1827, and again in the summer of 1828. In the late fall of 1830 Rigdon was converted to Mormonism, after only a few days' investigation, and later became one of its most prominent leaders. These, I believe, are the links in that chain of evidence which, when followed from the Book of Mormon, leads us directly to Spaulding's "Manuscript Found" THE END.
Return to: |
Charles A. Shook's 1914 Book
|