T H E
O p i n i o n o f D o w;
O R,
LORENZO's THOUGHTS,
ON DIFFERENT
Religious Subjects,
IN AN ADDRESS TO THE
PEOPLE OF NEW-ENGLAND.
Prove all things, and hold fast that which is good
St. PAUL
WINDHAM: PRINTED BY J. BYRNE.
1804.
[ii]
{ COPY-RIGHT SECURED.}
[ 3 ]
THE
O p i n i o n o f D o w.
OR
L O R E N Z O 's T H O U G H T S.
WHEN I was in Europe, considering
the bitter cup I once drank
in consequence of the doctrines of
particular election and reprobation I felt
my heart drawn to return and travel the
continent at large, to strive by the blessings
of God to remove the evils which
I considered originated therefrom ---
namely, presumption or despair, besides
a flood of other evils arising from a
train of doctrines which that draws after
it, viz -- Universalism, Deism, and Atheism,
as you may see them linked together
in the following sheets.
But in attempting to do this, though
I have had many trials and discouragements
to encounter, which nothing but
the grace of God could have supported
me under and carried me through yet
a flood of opposition and evil reproaches
arising from the bitter spirits of some,
which (as love is the spirit of religion,)
( 4 )
must be considered as the spirit of
perfection. Which spirit I know there
is danger of my drinking in; but it is
my prayer to God that I may ever be
kept from it. Love, I conceive to be
the best weapon to kill an enemy with
of any that I have found, as I have
experienced already in sundry instances.
Where all others would fail, this had the
desired effect, and would conquer. --
What is stronger than love? And perceiving
that I felt a love to ALL, though
I had been taught that God only loved
a few, which he had given to his
son: I could not reconcile the two ideas
together, how my love should exceed
the love of God -- and feeling within
myself, that I stood in danger of falling
into sin, and consequently into
condemnation; I could not reconcile it
with the common idea, that if a man
once obtained religion, he was always
safe, let him do what he would. This
put me upon examining the scriptures
for myself, and comparing past ideas
therewith: and on examining of the
same, I could find no promise that any
should be saved, but those who endured
unto the end. On the other hand, the
( 5 )
bible seemed to correspond with my
feelings, that there was danger, being
full of caution; and there is no need
of caution where there was no danger. --
The more light and knowledge a person
hath, and commits a crime, the worse it
must be; because he sins against the
more light; therefore any sin is greater
in a professor of religion, than in a non
professor, seeing he sins against the
greater light.
If the sin is the greater, of course the
condemnation and punishment must be
proportioned; as Christ saith, "he that
knoweth his master's will, and doeth it
not, shall be beaten with many stripes,
whereas, he that knoweth not his master's
will, shall be beaten with few." --
Therefore, if the sinner who never had
religion, deserves to be damned for actual
transgression; why not the professor,
upon the principles of impartial
justice.
Now it appears to me, that this doctrine,
once in grace, always in grace, is
inseparably connected with the doctrine
of particular election and reprobation; and
to deny the latter, and hold to the former,
( 6 )
to me appears inconsistent: for
if a saint cannot be punished in
proportion to his conduct, then he is not
accountable; and if he be not accountable,
then not rewardable; and if neither
rewardable nor punishable, then
his salvation or damnation does not
turn upon his actions, pro or con, but
upon the free electing love of God:
Therefore God will have mercy upon
whom he will, and whom he will, he
passeth by: Thus they appear connected
like two links in a chain. And it
appeareth moreover, that the doctrine
of particular election, leadeth to universalism:
for according to the above we
must suppose, that God decreed all
things; if so, God being wise, whatever
he hath decreed, he must have decreed
it right; consequently nothing cometh
to pass wrong -- then there is no sin, for
it cannot be sin to do right: if then one
shall be damned for doing right, why
not all; and if one is saved for doing
right, why not all, according to the
rule of impartial justice. Again, the
doctrine of election saith, all that was
given from the father to the son, in the
covenant of Grace, will be saved
( 7 )
none that Christ died for can be lost. --
The bible saith Christ died for all, and
A double L, does not spell part, nor
some, nor few, but it means all: Well,
now if all Christ died for will be saved,
and none of them can be lost, then
Universalism must be true, => and you
cannot deny it.
And it appears furthermore, that
Universalism leads to Deism -- for if all
are saved, none are lost, and of course
no future punishment: Therefore the
threatenings in the bible must be false,
like a sham scare crow hung up in the
field, to represent that which is not real.
And if the threatenings are false,
the promises are equally so: for while
the promises are given in one scale to
encourage virtue, the threatenings are
put in the opposite one, to discourage
vice: To deny the one, disallows of the
other, and of course breaks the chain of
the bible, and thereby destroys its
authority; consequently, ye cannot suppose
with propriety, that it came from
God by Divine direction; but rather,
that it was hatched up by some cunning
politician, to answer their political designs,
( 8 )
to keep the people in order -- and
that it has been kept on the carpet ever
since, by the black and blue coat, to get
a fat living out of the people. "Away
with the Bible," says the Deist, "I will
be imposed upon by that no more, but I
will go upon reason; for whoever came
back from the other world, to bring us
news from that country about Heaven
or Hell, or exhibit a map thereof?
Now, if I denied the bible, I should of
course deny miracles and inspiration,
for if I admit of them. I must in reason
admit of the propriety of the Bible.
But no one who denies inspiration
and miracles, can prove the existence
of a God. There are but six ways to
receive ideas, which are by inspiration,
or one of the five senses. Deny inspiration,
there are but five ways;
and matter of fact demonstrates, that a
man by these outward sensitive organs,
can neither hear, see, smell, taste or
feel God: How then can we know him
but by a revelation in the inward sense?
why saith the Deist, the works of
nature proclaim aloud in both my ears,
"there is a God," but I deny it according
to your scale of reasoning, for you
( 9 )
deny miracles; and yet you say what
has been once, may be again: Now if
there was a miracle once, there may be
one again; if so, then there may be
such a thing as revealed religion, for
that is but miraculous: But if there
cannot be a miracle again, that is an
argument there never was one, and of
course denies the works of Creation;
for it must have been a miracle to have
spoken a world into existence, and to
have formed intelligent beings -- Therefore,
if there never was a miracle, then
there never was such a thing as Creation:
Consequently the works of nature
do not speak forth a Divine Being, for
his hand never formed them; but they
argue, that matter is eternal, and that
all things come by nature -- for it is evident,
that if nought had been once, nought
had been now; for nothing cannot put
forth the act of power and beget something:
yet it is self-evident that something
must have existed eternally. Then
saith reason, if all things come by nature,
then nature is eternal; and when
forming from its primitive chaos, into
its present position, by congelation,
( 10 )
brought forth mankind, beasts and
vegetables spontaneously; something like
the mushroom growing up without seed,
or the moss growing on the tree and
are kept on the stage by transmigration,
like the caterpillar, transmigrating [and]
turning into a beautiful butterfly; or
the muck-worm into a horn-bug. Thus
nature assumes one form or shape for a
while, then laying that aside, takes up
another. In confirmation of this idea,
it appears, that one race of animals or
beings goes from the stage, and another
comes on the carpet: For instance, the
bones of a certain animal, found in
different parts of the continent of America,
demonstrates there was such a race of
beings once, called the Mammoth, which
as far as we know, are now extinct:
And the Hessian fly, which was discovered
a few years since, near where the
Hessian troops encamped, and from
thence took its name, supposed to have
been brought by them from Hessia --
and since this insect has greatly spread
over New-England, and destroys the
wheat; I have made much enquiry,
but cannot learn that it is found in the
country from whence the Hessians came.
( 11 )
From this, one may infer and argue,
that it is an animal, come on the stage
within late years, as it appears some
other insects have done. In further
confirmation of this idea, and which
stands opposed to the account given by
the bible, "that all animals were drowned,
except those with Noah in the
Ark." we find that although it is natural
for us to conclude, that all animals
would generate and be found on
that part where the Ark rested, et the
Racoon is peculiar to America: This
then is a new species of animal, and we
may say the account cannot be admitted
that all other parts were drowned: But
again in confirmation of revolutions
in nature we perceive, that even if
scripture be true, once Giants did exist;
but they are now extinct. On
strict examination, it appears that earth
and shells congealed, form marble -- and
wood when put into certain lakes of
water, becomes stone. The turf bogs
in Ireland, which are found on the
tops the highest mountains, or in the
vallies, miles in length and breadth,
scores of feet deep, evidently appear
to have been vegetables washed together
( 12 )
by some awful deluge; whole
trees with ancient artificial materials,
being found many feet below the surface.
-- I likewise was informed of a
spring in that country, by putting bars
or sheets of iron therein, they would be
converted into copper.
On my way from Georgia, I could
but observe great quantities of shells,
which to me appear to belong to the
oyster, some hundreds of miles from
any salt or brackish water, and it is
quite improbable they could have been
brought by human art, considering the
vast quantities found in the Savannahs
or Pirarahs to Tombibgy, and thence
to the Natchez country, and in the Chickasaw
nation. It evidently appears likewise,
that this western country was once
inhabited by a warlike informed people,
who had the use of mechanical instruments,
and there are evident marks of
antiquity, consisting of artificial mounts
and fortifications, &c. pronounced by
the curious, who have examined them,
to have been deserted long before the
discovery of America by Columbus. --
One of these mounts, a few miles above
the Natchez, covers about six acres of
( 13 )
ground, forty feet above the common
level, on which stands another forty
feet high, making in all eighty feet. --
Great numbers of these artificial mounts,
fortifications and beds of ashes, are to
be found, extending from the western
parts of Georgia, to the Mississippi, and
then northward with the waters of said
river, to Lake Erie, &c. all which denote
it once was a populous, and since
is a foresaken country; which neither
history nor tradition hath given us any
information of. Therefore it appears,
that greater revolutions have taken place
in this terraqueous globe, than many
imagine; and herefrom we might suppose,
that the earth hath stood longer
than the six thousand years calculated
from scripture -- and with the Chinese
assent to their boasted ancient histories,
&c.
Thus I shall be an Atheist instead of
a Deist, but I cannot be the one nor the
other according to reason -- for if there
be no God, nature depends on chance,
and this earth would be like a well
stringed instrument, without a skilful
hand to play upon it; or a well rigged
vessel, without mariners to steer her.
( 14 )
for every thing that has not a regulator,
is liable to go to ruin" And if all
things depend on chance, then by
chance there may be a God and Devil,
a Heaven and Hell. Saints and Sinners,
and by chance the Saints may
get to Heaven, and by chance the Sinners
may go to Hell. It is evidence in
reason, that as a stream cannot rise higher
than its fountain, so confusion cannot
be more noble than the cause: Consequently,
if confusion had been once,
it must have remained; but as the stars
keep their courses without infringing
upon each other in the different revolutions,
so the astronomer can calculate
his almanacs years before hand,
it is evident there is such a thing as
order; and to suppose this order to
have been eternal, would be arguing,
that the earth has stood forever, as we
now behold it; and to suppose that the
earth hath forever had its present form,
is to suppose that there has been an
eternal succession of men, beasts and
vegetables, and that to an infinite number;
(for if the number be not infinite,
how could the succession have been eternal,)
( 15 )
and yet to talk about an infinite
number, is a contradiction in terms, for
there is no number but what may be
made larger, by the addition of units;
but that which is infinite cannot be enlarged.
Again, if there has been an
eternal succession of men and beasts;
by the same rule there has been an
eternal succession of days and nights,
and years likewise -- This must be allowed,
(that infinite numbers are equal,
for if one number be smaller than the
other, how can it be said to be infinite?)
Well, if infinite numbers be equal,
and if there hath been an eternal succession
of years, and days, and nights,
we must suppose, that their infinite
numbers are equal. And yet to allow
there hath been as many years as there
hath been days and nights, is inconsistent,
seeing that it takes 365 days to
compose one year; and if the number
of years be less than the number of
days and nights the number cannot be
admitted to be infinite; consequently,
the succession cannot have been eternal;
therefore it must be, that there
was a time when years began: If so,
we must admit the idea, there is something
( 16 )
superior to nature, that formed
it, and of course an Almighty regulator,
that with wisdom, must have constructed
and preserved this system; and
this power and regulator must be felt,
dependent, and of course eternal, according
to the foregoing: And this
eternal, self-existent, all-wise regulator,
is what we term GOD, and what the Indians
term the GREAT MAN ABOVE,
Various are the ideas formed concerning
this GOD: Some acknowledge one
Supreme Being, but disallow of what
is called the Trinity; saying, how can
three be one? Answer, as rain, snow
and hail, when reduced to their origin
are one, (water:) and as light, heat and
colour, are seen in one element, (fire,)
and as the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian
Ocean, compose but one, so if in natural
things three can make one, why
may we not admit the idea with reason,
that three can be one in things supernatural
and Divine, &c. What is meant
by God the Father, is, that eternal Being,
that is every where present. What
is meant by Christ the Son, is the manhood
of Christ, being brought forth by
the Omnipotent power of God, as the
( 17 )
Evangelists relate, and that manhood
being filled with the divine nature, of
course he would be God, as well as man,
and man as well as God -- two distinct
natures in one person; and it is no
more inconsistent with reason, to acknowledge
that the came as above, than
to acknowledge a miracle for the first
man's origin; which idea, in reason,
we must admit, for there cannot be an
effect without a cause; and as men do
exist, it is evident there is but one way
for them to generate in nature; if so,
who did the first man and woman generate
from -- to suppose that they came
by nature, is to suppose the earth
brought them forth spontaneously, if so,
take the inhabitants from an island, and
it would produce them again -- but matter
of fact, sayeth it will not. Then, if
nature hath not changed, it never bro't
forth people; for if it had, it might again
do so, and if not, a miracle hath taken
place in nature. ==> What is meant by
the Holy Ghost, is the spirit of God,
proceeding from the father, through the
mediation of the man Christ Jesus,
down to the sons of men; the office of
( 18 )
which spirit, is to instruct mankind, and
purify and prepare them, for the enjoyment
of God in Glory.
If I deny there was such a person
as Christ on this earth eighteen hundred
years ago, I should deny three
things: -- 1st. Our Dates. -- 2d, All Sacred,
and 3d, The greatest part of profane
history; which historians in general
would not be willing to give up.
If U allow there was such a person as
Christ, I must acknowledge his miracles,
too, for the same histories, sacred and
profane, which mention his person, relate
his miracles, and to deny his miracles,
would be giving the histories the
lie, and of course destroy their authority.
If I allow his miracles I must allow
his sacred character also; for it is
inconsistent, with reason, to believe that
God would aid and assist a liar, or an
impostor, to do the mighty deeds which
we are informed Christ did.
If there be no such thing as inspiration,
how could the Prophets foretel
future events, out of the common course
of nature? Some people say the prophecies
were written in prophetic language,
after the things took place, but
( 19 )
that is unreasonable to suppose, for if
they were, they were wrote as late down
as what the New Testament dates back,
and if so, then both Testaments came
on the carpet about one time. You
could not impose one Testament on
the learned people, without the other;
seeing their close connection: But as
the Jews acknowledge the Old Testament,
and disallow the New; I therefrom
argue, that, the Old Testament
was written sometime previous to the
New, of course, previous to the things
being translated, which were predicted.
It must, therefore have been by
divine inspiration. But says one, the
word revelation, when applied to religion,
means something immediately
communicated from God to man: --
that a man tells a second, the second a
third, &c. it is revelation to the first only,
to the rest it is mere heresay.
And if the Bible was revealed once,
it was not revealed to me; to me, therefore,
it is heresay? Answer. Allowing
the above, yet if a man tells me, it is
revealed to him, that my father is dead,
&c. and the same spirit which revealed
( 20 )
it to him, accompanies his words with
energy to my heart, then it is revelation
to me as well as to him, and not bare
heresay. Consequently, if the same spirit
which dictated the writing of the Bible,
attends the same with energy, then
it is not heresay, but revelation; because
we have a divine conviction, of
the truths therein contained. And the
sincere of different persuasions, find
something in the Bible to attract their
attentions, above any other book; and
even the Deists, when conscience begins
to lash them, find something in the Bible
to attract their minds, of the truths of
which the conduct of a number to be
found on this continent might be adduced.
Neither can I believe all will be favored;
for in Mark 111. 29, we are informed
of a certain character, which hath never
forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal
damnation, which they could not be
in danger of, if there be no such thing;
and in Luke 16th, we read not a parable,
but a positive matter of fact (related
by Christ himself, who knew what was
transacted in eternity, as well as in time)
concerning a rich man, who died and
( 21 )
went to hell; and there was a separation
between him and the good place; and
of one be lost, universalism is not true.
We feel in our breast that, we are accountable
to God, and if so, then rewardable
or punishable, according to
our behavior and capacity; and of
course a day of accounts must take place,
when the rewards, or punishments are
given. Some say we have all our punishment
here. In reason I deny it; for
the benefit of religion is to escape punishment,
and if so, none have punishment
but the vicious; but as many of
the virtuous have suffered the most
cruel, tormenting, lingering deaths, as
may be said, for years, in matters of
tender conscience; while others have
lived on flowery beds of ease, and thus
die; from this I argue, that the punishment
is to come hereafter.
If all go to heaven as soon as they
die, it being looked upon as aÊpiece of
humanity, to relieve the distressed, would
it not be right for me to end all the
sorrows of those I can, who are in trouble?
And does this not open a door,
to argue, that murder is humanity, and
thereby send them to Heaven? But
( 22 )
says one. I will acknowledge future
punishment, but it is not so long, or so
bad as it is represented by some; for
we read of the resurrection, when all
mortal bodies shall be raised, of course
become immortal, and spiritual; and
corporeal fire and brimstone cannot operate
on a spiritual body, and of course
the punishment is but the horror of a
guilty conscience. And the word Forever,
frequently in the scripture, being
of a limited nature, it may be inferred
the punishment is not eternal. Answer.
Allowing that the punishment is only
the horror of a guilty conscience;
(which will bear dispute) yet I think,
that horror to the mind, will be found
equal to fire and brimstone to the material
body; for frequently I have been
called to visit people on sick beds, who
have told me, that their pain of body was
great, but their pain of mind so far exceeded
it, as to cause them to forget their
pain of body, for hours together, unless
some person spoke particularly to them
concerning it. Again you know what
horror you have felt, for a short space
for one crime. Now supposing all the
sins that ever you committed, in tho't,
( 23 )
word, or deed, in public, and in private,
were set in array before you, so that you
could view all of them at one glance --
And at the same time, that conscience
were to have its full latitude, to give
you the lash; would not the horror
which here causeth people to forget their
temporal pain, while there is hope, be
worse than fire to the body, when hope
is forever fled -- for when hope is gone,
there is no support.
And the idea that the punishment is
not eternal, because the word forever,
sometimes in Scripture is of a limited nature,
I think will not do, because the
duration of certain words, are bounded
by the duration of the things unto which
they allude. For instance, "The servant
shall serve his master forever," in
Moses' law. The word forever, was
bounded by the life of the servant. And
where it relates to mortality, it is bounded
by mortality, of course, where it relates
to immortality, it is bounded by
immortality. And where it relates to
God, it is bounded by the eternity of
God. And as we are informed in several
parts of Scripture, after that mortality
( 24 )
is done away, that the wicked shall
be banished forever, from the presence
of God. The word forever, and the
word eternal must be synonimous, having
one and the same meaning, as endless;
being bounded by the eternity of
God, and the endless duration of the immortal
soul, &c. Matt. xxv. 41. 46.
2. Thes. 1. 9. Rev. xix. 3. Jude 7.
And observing the doctrine of Particular
Election, and reprobation, to tend
to presumption, or despair, and those
who preached it up to make the bible
clash and contradict itself, by preaching
somewhat like this: --
"You can and you can't -- You shall and
you shan't -- You will and you won't -- And
you'll be damned if you do -- And you'll be
damned if you don't --"
Thus contradicting themselves, that
people must do, and yet they cannot do,
and God must do all, and at the same
time invite them to come to Christ, &c.
These inconsistencies caused me to
reflect with my past experience, and
conclude that, the true tenor of the bible
did not clash, of course that a connect
chain should be carried thro that
book, and the medium struck between
( 25 )
the dark passages, which literally contradict,
and reconcile them together by
explaining Scripture by Scripture. And
by striving so to do, I imbibed what
here follows: -- 1st. That Election is a
bible Doctrine, but not an elect number,
for I cannot find that in the Bible,
but an Elect Character, viz. "He that
becomes a true penitent, willing to be
made Holy, and saved by free grace, merited
only by CHRIST. And on the
other hand, instead of a reprobate number,
it is a reprobate character, namely,
him that obstinately, and finally continues
in unbelief, that shall be cast off,
&c. Thus any one may discover, that
it is an election and reprobation of characters,
instead of numbers ==> and you
cannot deny it. But the following scriptures
demonstrate undeniably, that God
instead of reprobating any, is willing to
receive all (2 Pet. 3. 9. Ezek. 33. 11.
1 Tim. 2. 3, 4. 2 Cor. 5. 19) Secondly,
that Christ instead of dying only
for a part, the Prophets, Angels, Christ
and the Apostles, positively affirm, that
salvation by his merits is possible for all.
(Genesis 28. 14. Isaiah, 53. 6. Luke
( 26 )
2. 10. John 3. 16, 17.) Thirdly, that
the Holy Spirit doth not strive with a
part only, as some say, a special call, but
strives with every man according to the
hardness of his heart; while the day of
mercy lasts -- (Titus, 2. 11. John, 1. 9,
and 16. 8. compare chap. 6. 44, with
chap. 12. 32.) Again, there is a Gospel
for, and an invitation to all ==> and you
cannot deny it -- (Mark 16. 15. Matt.
11. 28.) Again, there is a duty, which we
owe to God, according to reason,
conscience and scripture; and there
are glorious promises, for our encouragement
in the way of duty, and aweful
threatenings in the way of disobedience.
(Prov. 28 chap. 13 v. Matt. 5. 2 to 8,
and 7. 24 to 28. Isa. 1 chap. 16 to
20. Psal. 9. 17.) And now to affirm
that a part were unconditionally elected
for Heaven, and can never be lost, what
need was there of a Saviour? To save
them from what? And if the rest have
no probability of salvation, who are benefited
by Christ? Or what did he come
for? Not to benefit the Elect or Reprobate,
but to accomplish a mere sham
of solemn nothing. This reminds me
of a story I heard, concerning a negro
( 27 )
who had just returned from meeting --
his master said, well Jack, how did you
like the minister? "Why massa, me
scarcely know, for the minister say, God
makey beings, calla man; he pickey out
oney here, oney dare, and givey dem to
Jesus Christ, and da cant be lost. He
makey all de rest reprobate, and givey
dem to de Devil, da cant be saved. --
And de Devil, he go about like a roaring
lion, seeking to get away some a
Christ, and he can't. De minister, he
go about to get away some de Devil's,
an he can't; me donno which de greatest
fool, de Pleacher or de Devil."
It is evident that the Devil and the
damned in Hell, do not believe in the
doctrine of eternal decrees: For it is the
nature of sinners, to strive to justify
themselves in evul, and cast the blame
elsewhere. This is an evil practice,
therefore came from an evil source, and
consequently from the Devil. When
Adam fell, and God call'd to him, he cast
the blame on the woman; God turning
to her, she cast the blame on the serpent;
God turned to him and he was speechless.
Now, if he had believed in the doctrine
of decrees, does it not appear evidently,
( 28 )
that he would have replied? Adam
was not left to the freedom of his own
will; he was bound by the decrees, and
we have only fulfilled thy decrees and
done thy will, and thou oughtest to reward
us for it." But he was speechless,
and knew nothing about such talk then,
therefore it must be something he has
hatched up since -- as saith the Poet:
"There is a Reprobation plan,
"Some how it did arise;
"By the Predestinarian clan,
"Of horrid cruelties.
"The plan is this, they hold a few,
"They are ordained for Heaven,
"They hold the rest accursed crew,
"That cannot be forgiven.
"They do hold, God hath decreed,
"Whatever comes to pass;
"Some to be damd'd, some to be freed,
"And this they call free grace.
"This iron bedstead they do fetch,
"To try our hopes upon;
"And if too short, we must he stretched,
"Cut off, if we're too long.
"This is a bold serpentine scheme,
"It suits the serpent well;
"If he can make the sinner dream,
"That he is doom'd to Hell.
( 29 )
"Or if he can persuade a man,
"Decree is on his side;
"Then he will say, without delay,
"He tells one sinner, he's decreed,
"Unto eternal bliss;
"He tells another, he can't be freed,
"For he is damned to miss.
"The first he bindeth fast in pride,
"The second in despair;
"If he can only keep them tied,
"Which way he does not care."
It appeareth by the rich man's desiring
his five brethren to be warned,
least they cane to Hell with him, &c.
Luke 16th, that he did not believe their
states to be unalterably fixed by God's
decrees; for if he did, why did he request
their warning, saying, "if one arose
from the dead, they would repent &c."
It appeareth likewise, that if God hath
decreed all things, that his decrees are
as ancient as his knowledge; as decrees
are generally argued from his foreknowledge,
and that he foreknows it
must be so, because he hath decreed it,
&c. This opens a door to argue, there
was a time when God was ignorant and
knew nothing. For a decree is an act
( 30 )
of the mind, and there cannot be an action,
without there being a particular
time when that action took place; if so,
then if God hath decreed all things, it
must be, that there was a time when
God passed those decrees; and if so,
then there was a time, when the decrees
were not passed, and if God did not
foreknow any thing until he decreed it,
then there was a time when God knew
nothing: This is the truth ==> and you
cannot deny it.
And now to talk about God's foreknowledge
or decreeing all things from
eternity, appears a nonsensical phrase,
because, to say from all eternity, implies
eternity had a beginning: And as some
use an unmeaning expression to convey
an idea of unbeginning time; for the
want of language, it is nonsense to attempt
to build an argument thereon:
For as it is argued in the foregoing,
that God is eternal, we may admit with
propriety, that he possesseth all the attributes
that are ascribed to him; and yet
it is not inconsistent to say that the first
thing that ever God made, was time, and
in time he made all things, and probably
the angelic creation was previous to
( 31 )
men. Now many attempt to make
God the author of sin: But sin is not a
creature as many falsely think: it is the
abuse of Good. And, to say that God
who is good abuses good, is the highest
blasphemy that we could impeach the
Deity with; therefore he cannot be the
author of it, consequently it must have
come from another source. Now we
must admit the idea, that there was a
time when there was no creature, but
the Creator only; and declarative glory
could never redound to God; except,
that finite accountable intelligencies,
were created, for what should declare
his glory, except such accountable beings
were made; and of course must
have remained in solemn silence:
Therefore, declarative glory could never
have redounded to God. But, that
he might have declarative glory arising
from his attributes, by intelligencies; it
appears that angels were created, and
we must suppose they were all happy,
holy and good at first; seeing this is
the nature of God, (as all argue, from
the Christian to the Deist.) As likeness
doth beget likeness, and every cause produces
its own effect; and as we are informed,
( 32 )
that the Devil sinneth from the
beginnings, and that some kept not their
first estate, but left their own habitation,
and sinned, and were cast down to hell,
&c. 2 Pet. 2, 4, Jude 6, Rom, 4. 15.
1 John, 3 c. 4. 8 v.) And as we read,
where there is no law, there is no transgression:
It must be, that the Angels had
a law to keep and power sufficient to
keep or break the law; or else, how
could they be accountable? And if
they were not, they could not be reasonable,
and if not, then not praise or
blame worthy. But says one, allowing
that God did make such pure intelligent
accountable beings, and had a
sovereign right to demand their obedience,
seeing they were dependent:
What should induce a Holy Being to sin
against a Holy God, especially as there
was no evil in him nor them, nor
yet any to tempt him? Answer, suppose
I were walking along in meditation,
in a great field; of a sudden I
cast a look forward, and can see no
end to it; it would be natural for me
to stop and look back the way from
whence I came, So, in my opinion, the
Angels were looking into futurity --
( 33 )
they could discover no end to eternity,
and it would be natural for them to reflect
on time past. They could remember
no time when they had no existence,
any more than I can. This would
open a door for a self-temptation to
arise in thought, "how do we know but
we are eternal with God?" And why
should we be dependent on him, or be
accountable to him? In order to find
out whether they were dependent or independent,
the only method was, to
try their strength, by making head
against the King of Heaven, by a violation
of his command.
Now, evil is the abuse of good, and the
first abuse of good, was the origin of evil;
and as their commandment was good,
the evil consisted in the abuse of it; and
the natural consequence of breaking
the same, would be to convert them into
Devils -- as the consequence of murder
is death. From this we may see, that
God made a Holy Being, but he made
himself a Devil. Now, it appears to me
impossible, for God to shew the Devils
mercy, consistent with the principles of
reason and justice, for I may sin against
my equal, and in the eyes of the law;
( 34 )
the crime is looked upon a trifle; the
same crime against a government, would
forfeit my liberty, if not my life. Thus
the magnitude of a crime is not looked
upon, according to the dignity of the
offender, but according to the dignity of
the offended: Of course, a finite being
sinning against an infinite God, there is
an infinite demerit in the transgression:
of course justice demands infinite satisfaction.
A finite being can make finite
satisfaction only, although the crime demands
an infinity of punishment. -- A
finite being cannot bear an infinity of
punishment at once: Therefore the
punishment must be made up in duration,
and of course be eternal, that it
may be adequate to the crime.
But says one, why was not a mediator
provided for fallen angels, as well
as for fallen men? Answer -- It was impossible,
in the reason and nature of
things; for when mankind fell, it was
by the action of one, and they multiply.
So the Godhood and Manhood could
be united, as in the person of Christ;
But not so with the Devils, for they
were all created active beings, and each
stood or fell for himself, and of course
( 35 )
was actually guilty, and therefore must
have actual punishment, except a Mediator
was provided; which could not
be, for the Devils do not multiply;
therefore the Godhead and Devilhood.
could not be joined together. -- But
supposing it could, yet says Paul,
without shedding of blood, there can
be no remission, and spirits have no
blood to shed: And upon this ground
it appears, that the Devils' restoration
or redemption, must fall through.
The scripture which sayeth, Rom. 9.
11, &c. "The children being yet unborn,
having done neither good nor
evil, that the purpose of God according
to Election, might stand, it was
said unto her, the elder shall serve the
younger"; as it is written, "Jacob
have I loved, and Esau I hated."
&c. any person by examining Genesis,
25. 23. and Mal. 1. 1, 2. may see that
Paul's talk doth not mean their persons,
but that, understanding it must be
applied to their posterities. And to
apply them the other way, as tho' one
was an Elect, the other a Reprobate, on
purpose to be damned, without a possibility
( 36 )
of escape, is a plot of the Devil,
to blindfold mankind by a multitude
of words, without knowledge; for no
such inference can be drawn from
that passage, that Jacob was made for
salvation, and Esau for damnation. --
But observe, it must be applied to their
posterities: See Gen. 25. 23. "And
the Lord said unto Rebecca, two nations
are in thy bowels, and the one
people shall be stronger than the other
people, and the elder shall serve the
younger." Which came to pass in the
reign of king David, when the Edomites
were brought in subjection to the
Jacobites, (2 Sam. 8. 14. 1ÊChron. 18.
13.) and that passage, "Jacob have I
loved, and Esau have I hated," was not
spoken before the children were born,
but hundreds of years after they were
dead, by (Mal. 1. 1, 2.) Now, cannot
any person who is unprejudiced, plainly
discover, that the word "Jacob" here
means the Jewish nation, which God
saw fit to exalt to high national privileges,
because Christ was to come thro
that lineage, &c. And as to "Esau
have I hated," the word here in scripture,
frequently means loving in a less
( 37 )
degree, &c. for instance -- Christ sayeth,
except a man hate his father, mother,
and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple -- the word hate here, means
loving in a less degree, as we are to love
God supremely; and lent favors in a
less degree, as belonging to him: So
the passage "Esau have I hated" meaning
that God did not see fit to exalt the
Edomites, to so high national privileges
as the Jews; yet they were the next
highest, for their land was given to
them for a possession, which the Jews
were not permitted to take from them,
as they were going from Egypt to Canaan,
(Deuteronomy, 2 c. 4, 5 v.) and
that passage (Heb. 12. 17.) which sayeth,
"that Esau was rejected, and found
no place of repentance. though he
fought it carefully with tears." we must
not therefrom infer, that it was God
who rejected him, because he was a reprobate,
but his father Isaac.
Take notice, at a certain time Esau
went out a hunting, and on his return
home, being at the point to perish
with hunger, fell into Jacob's tent, and
desired refreshment; but Jacob attempted
( 38 )
to make Esau's extremity his opportunity
to grow rich; and to cheat him
out of his birthright, for a mess of
pottage: And Esau rather than starve,
promised to give it up; and who can
blame him. considering his distress. --
All that a man hath, will be given for
his life, saith Satan, ==> this is the truth,
and you cannot deny it, (Gen. 23. 30.
&c.) but there is no account that ever
Jacob got the birth right, but by Easu's
continuing with his father, and being
so rich on Jacob's return; it appears he
lived with his father, and was heir to the
inheritance. Jacob got not any thing
from Esau; but Esau got a present from
him. After this Isaac was determined
to bless Esau, and commanded him to
get venison for that purpose. And
while he was gone for it, Rebecca tells
Jacob to kill kids, &c. and he should
get the blessing: He saith, "I shall get
a curse instead of a blessing" -- she said,
the curse be on me, &c. and it appears
as tho' she got it, as it was the means
of her looting her idol's company during
her life time, for there is no account
of her being alive at his return. --
Scarcely had he told the lies to Isaac,
( 39 )
and with drawn, &c. but Esau came in,
and thereby blind Isaac perceived the
deception in full, and began to tremble
exceedingly, by which Esau perceived
what had passed, and immediately lifted
up his voice and wept, and sought after
repentance: nor in himself (for he had
done nothing to repent of) but in his
father Isaac. But Isaac would not take
back the blessing, but said, Jacob is blessed,
and shall be blessed (Gen. 27 c. &c.)
From this loss of the blessing, some people
thing Esau was reprobated and
damned: But Paul saith, Heb. 11. 20.
by faith Jacob blessed Jacob and Esau.
concerning things to come. Some forget
to read that Esau was blessed as well
as Jacob, though not in so great a degree,
and how could he be blessed by faith if
he were reprobated? (Gen. 17 c. 39.
40.) Esau was blessed with four things;
the first two were like a part of Jacob's,
viz. the dew of Heaven and the fatness
of the Earth -- thirdly, by his sword he
was to live -- and fourthly, when he
should have the dominion, he was to
break Jacob's (or Jewish) yoke from off
his neck, which came to pass in the reign
of Jehoram, the son of Jehoshaphat,
( 40 )
2 Chron. 21 c. 8, 10. And now to show
the inconsistency of thinking that Esau
served Jacob, the younger, it doth appear
that Jacob served Esau; and moreover
that Jacob had no religion when
he attempted to cheat and lie, that being
contrary to the spirit of Christianity.
But it appears that he got converted afterwards,
when on his way to Padanaram;
he lay down to rest in the woods,
and in the night he had a Vision, in
which he saw a ladder, the top reaching
to Heaven, &c. Now, as the ladder had
two sides, it represents the Godhead and
Manhood of Christ, and the rounds, the
different degrees of Grace. If Jacob
had been pious, doubtless he would have
realized the preference of God, being
there to protect him from the wild beasts;
but his expression. "the Lord was in
this place, and I knew it not," argues
ignorance. Secondly, he adds it is no
other than the house of God, and gate
of Heaven, which is the language of
young converts. -- Thirdly, he made a
vow, if God would give him food to eat,
and raiment to put on, and bring him
back in peace, that God should be his
God; which certainly implies, that he
( 41 )
did not serve God before, as he did afterwards,
(Gen. 28. 16.).
Observe, Jacob served Esau first, was
afraid of him, and ran from home twenty
years, through scenes of sorrow, and
had his wages changed not less than ten
times -- Secondly, when he set out to
return, his past conduct created such
fear in his breast, that he dare not see
Esau's face, until by messengers he enquired,
"may I come in peace?" --
And understanding, that Esau with a
body of men, was coming to meet him,
his sleep departed from him. He divided
his host in two bands, and wrestled
all night in prayer; and such fear surely
denotes guilt. Thirdly, he sent a number
of messengers with presents, and a
messenger to Esau, calling him Lord, as if
himself was the servant. Fourthly, Esau
bowed not at all; but Jacob bowed
not once, nor twice only, but seven
times; and then cried out. "I have
seen thy face, as though I had seen the
face of God." Now, if Esau was a Reprobate,
how could his face have been
as God's -- nay, it would have been as
the Devil's. But as they had a joyful
( 42 )
meeting together, like two christian
brethren, that had been some time absent;
I therefore conclude, that Jacob
saw the image of God in his brother
Esau; and in that sense, Esau's face
might be said to be as the face of God,
and in no other. And as the general
tenor of Esau's conduct, was not so bad
as some parts of Jacob's conduct, I therefrom
conclude, that Esau died in peace;
and if ever I can be so happy as to get
to glory, I expect to meet Esau there as
well as Jacob. Gen. 32 and 33 c. &c.
If I believed all things were decreed,
I must suppose that Pharoah did the will
of God in all things, seeing God decreed
all his thoughts, words and actions:
And the will being the determined
faculty, it must be that whatever
God decrees, he wills; therefore, Pharoah
did the will of God, according to
that doctrine. ==> and you cannot deny
it. If the scripture be true, then Pharoah
doing the will of God, according
to that doctrine, must be saved according
to the intimation of Christ; that
whoever doeth the will of God, is his
brother, sister and mother -- observe if
all Pharoah's conduct was decreed, he
( 43 )
did as well as he could, and Peter as
bad as he could; according to that doctrine
then, which is the most praise or
blame worthy? Again, if God decreed
Pharoah's conduct, did he not decree it
right; and if so, could it be wrong? --
If not, there was no sin, consequently
no punishment; unless you say a man
is punishable for doing right. Again,
if God decreed Pharoah should do as
he did, why did he command him to act
to the reverse? Does he decree one
thing and command another? If so,
then you make God's decrees and commandments
clash: For according to
that doctrine, God's revealed will is, that
we should obey; and his decreed will
is, that we should disobey. Thus you
make out that God has two wills right
opposite to each other, which makes
God divided against himself -- Christ intimates,
that which is divided against
itself cannot stand: If so, then Deity
being divided; must fall, and of course
the works of nature sink and go to ruin.
There is no account of Pharoah's
heart being more hard than others, until
he became hardened; but it appeareth
( 44 )
from Rom. 5.19 & 20 v. that the hearts
of people are alike, hard by nature,
Well, saith one, what is the meaning of
that scripture, "For this same purpose
have I raised thee up, that I may shew
forth my power in thee. And I will harden
his heart, & he shall not let the people
go &c." Answer, the Lord raised
Pharoah up. Up from what? From the
dust unto a child, from a child to a man,
to be a king on the throne, that he might
shew forth his power in him. And he has
raised up you and me, and all mankind,
for the same purpose: viz. to shew
forth his power in us; if it be not for
that, what is it for? We read in several
places, that the Lord hardened Pharoah,
and yet Pharoah hardened
himself: How could that be? God
do it, and yet Pharoah do it. We read
that the Lord afflicted Job, and yet that
satan did it: (Job, 19. 21, and 2. 7.)
And that the Lord moved David to number
Israel, and yet that satan did it, &c.
(2 Samuel, 24, 1 and 1 Chron. 25. 1.)
and that Solomon built the temple, and
yet tells how many workman did it.
Thus we see that there is a first cause,
and a second cause, as saith the Poet:
( 45 )
"No evil from God proceed,
"Twas only suffered, not decreed;
"As darkness is not from the sun,
"Nor mounts the shades, till he is gone."
Reason saith, that mankind are agents
or else Prophets; for they can foretell
some things, and then fulfil them -- this
is the truth, ==> and you cannot deny it.
If so, then it may be said with propriety,
that the Lord hardened the heart of
Pharoah, and yet that Pharoah hardened
himself, even as mankind are hardened
in this our day, &c. Observe,
First, the Lord called to Pharaoh by favor,
and gave him a kingdom. Secondly,
the Lord called by commandments,
and Pharaoh would not obey,
by saying, "I know not the Lord, neither
Lord called thirdly, by miracles, but
Pharoah reasoned against them in a diabolical
way, by setting the magicians to
work. Them fourthly, God called by
affliction, then Pharoah made a promise
to obey God, and let the Jews depart,
if the affliction might be removed: But
when the judgment was removed, Pharoah
broke his promise; therein he was
to blame; for breaking his promise,
( 46 )
his heart would naturally become harder,
like metal when melted, it is tender,
and when grown cold is harder than before,
and of course requires a hotter fire
to melt it again; so it required a heavier
judgment to operate on Pharoah,
and God would send it, and Pharoah
would promise and break them, till ten
afflictions passed away, and when the
first born was slain by the Lord, and yet
by Evil Angels, as David in the Psalms
tells you, Pharoah was shocked and let
the Jews depart -- He pursued them, and
God permitted him to be taken in his
own folly, and drowned in the Red Sea;
thus we find how God hardened Pharoah's
heart, and yet how he hardened
himself by disobedience, and so in this
our day it may be said, that God hardens
some, and yet they harden themselves,
as follows: -- First, God calls be
prosperity or favours, and yet many enjoy
them without a feeling sense from
whom they flow. Secondly, God calls
by commandments, an inward monitor,
telling what is right and what is wrong.
But some don't give attention thereto
which, if they would, they would hear
the voice more and more distinctly, till
( 47 )
at length it would become their teacher.
Thirdly, God calls by miracles, the
operation of his spirit perhaps under
preaching, or some other cause, and they
have thought, if I could always feel as
I do now, I should soon be a Christian;
or if all my companions would
turn and serve the Lord, I would gladly
go with them to heaven. But through
inattention, those serious impressions,
which I call miracles, soon wear off. A
miracle is something done out of the
common course of nature, by the operation
of the power or spirit of God;
therefore, O reader, it was not the minister
who made you have those feelings,
but the power of God; therefore, in
some sense you have been called upon
miraculously. ==> and you cannot deny it.
4thly, God calls by affliction, and
when people are taken sick, and view
death near, they make vows and promises,
and think how good they will be
if God will spare them and raise them
up. But when they are recovered, then
(Pharoah like) too soon forget their
promises, and break their vows, and
hereby become harder than before, and
can do things without remorse which
( 48 )
once they would have felt the lash of
conscience for. And that preaching
which once would make impressions on
their mind, strikes the heart and bounds
back like a stone glancing against a
rock. This character is what may be
termed a Gospel hardened sinner. Thus
you may discover that this plan clears
the Divine Character and calls the
blame on the creature, where it ought
to be; whereas, the opposite would
call the blame directly on God, if he
decreed it so. Although Christ hath
promised once to draw ALL men unto
him, (not to drag, for bait draws birds,
yet they come voluntarily) yet he never
promises to draw them a second time,
but on the other hand positively saith,
my spirit shall not always strive with
men. And again, because I have called
and ye have refused, but ye have set at
naught my council and would none of
my reproofs, I also will laugh at your
calamity, and mock when your fear
cometh. Ephraim is joined to his idols,
let him alone. And the language of a
reprobate is "the harvest is past, the
summer is ended, and we are not saved."
Jer. 8. 20. Prov. 1. 24 to 26. Gen 6. 3.
( 49 )
As the Lord requireth a right sacrifice
in the path of (revealed) duty, those,
who like Cain, bring a wrong offering,
the fruit of the ground, instead of the
firstling of the flock like Abel, must expect,
like Cain, to be rejected, (Gen, 4. 7.)
for God saith, behold I have set
life and death before you, choose you
this day, whom you will serve, &c.
Josh. 24. 15. one thing is needful, and
Mary hath chosen the good part. We
don't read, God chose it for her, even
as we read in John 3. 19. that this is the
condemnation, that light is come into
the world, and men loved darkness rather
than light, &c. Oh! reader, prepare
to meet thy God!
Obj. Hath not the potter power
over the clay, of the same lump, to
make one vessel to honour, and another
to dishonour.
Ans. A potter never makes any vessel
on purpose to destroy it, for the most
dishonourable one in family sickness is as
useful as the honourable tea-cup in time
of health. Neither doth God make any
on purpose for destruction, but all
mankind are useful, if they get the spirit
( 50 )
of the station and fill up that sphere
which they are qualified for. For without
servants there can be no masters;
without subjects, no rulers; without
commonality, no quality; and any one
may observe that David was elected or
set apart to be king; Jeremiah and Samuel
Prophets, &c. and any discerning
eye may easily discover, that Paul's
election, Rom. 9. was not an election
to future happiness, but of temporal
advantages. And yet those not so positive,
but what the privileges might be
forfeited and lost by sin, as you may find
1 Chron. 28. 9, 10. if thou serve him
with a perfect heart, and with a willing
mind, he will be found of thee; but if
thou forsake him, he will call thee off
forever: Deut. 30. 15, 19. Moses dying
declaration was that the children of
Israel must obey, and if they would all
needful blessings they should have, but
if rebellious, should be cursed and scattered,
&c. ==> This is the truth, and you
cannot deny it. And observe Paul,
when talking about the clay and potter,
alludes to Jer. 18. where the prophet
was commanded to see the potter work,
&c. And then God says, v. 6. cannot I
( 51 )
do with you as the potter, O house of
Israel, &c. Again, v. 7. at what instant
I shall speak concerning a nation or
kingdom, to pluck up, pull down, or
destroy it. If that nation against whom
I have pronounced "turn from their
evil, I will repent of the evil I thought
to do unto them." "At what instant I
shall speak concerning a nation or kingdom,
to build or plant it, if it do evil in
my sight, that it obey not my voice, then
will I repent of the good wherewith I
said I would benefit them."
Now observe, if God be unchangeable,
as Paul saith, God cannot lie, then
he is bound by his immutability or the
law of his nature, to perform his promises
to the obedient, and his threatenings
against the disobedient. Objection. --
Bible language is, I will and you shall,
and the promises are yea and amen,
without any if's or and's.
Answer. To take the promises without
the condition is a practice of Satan,
Luke 4. 10, 12, which he made use of
to our Lord to get him to fall down
from the battlement of the temple, and
thereby tempt God, and presume on
God, because of the promise which the
( 52 )
Devil intended he should think to be
unconditional; and so bear him up in
the way of disobedience. -- Whereas, our
Saviour, knowing the path of duty to
be the way of safety, replied, tis written
thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
For in the way of obedience there is a
promise of preservation, and in the way
of disobedience a threatening of destruction:
Therefore, to cut those two
little letters IF out of the bible, which
makes such a great significant word, is
wrong, seeing it is so frequent in scripture;
and frequently there are conditions
implied in the Bible, though not
expressed; for instance, David, when at
Keliah, (1 Sam. 23. &c.) enquired of
the Lord whether Saul would come
down, and the men of the city deliver
him up, and the Lord answered in the
affirmative. Here is no condition expressed.
yet there is one implied, for David
left the city and fled to the wilderness,
so Saul came not down, neither
did the people deliver him up. Again,
God said to the Ninevites, by Jonah,
yet forty days and Ninevah shall be
overthrown. Now if you say all threatenings
are without condition, you give
( 53 )
God the lie, for the city was spared in
consequence of their believing God, and
turning from their evil way. Jonah 3.
5. 10. This is the truth ==> and you
cannot deny it. Again, Ezek. 33 &c.
There is a condition implied and explained
undeniably, though not so fully
expressed at the first, concerning the
righteous and wicked man, which you
may read at your leisure: Objection,
Says one, God will have mercy on whom
he will have mercy, &c. -- Answer: --
GOD will have mercy on whom he will,
Come think you whom they be;
'Tis every one that loves his son,
And from their sins do flee.
'Tis every one that doth repent,
And truly hates his sin;
'Tis every one that is content,
To turn to God again.
And whom he will he hardeneth,
Come think you whom they be;
"Tis every one that hates his son,
Likewise his liberty.
"Tis every one that in sin persist,
And do outstand their day;
Then God in justice leaves them to
Their own heart's lust a Prey.
( 54 )
Objec. "My people shall be made
willing in the day of my power," says
one. Answer. That is home made
scripture, for the Almighty doth not so
speak, but king David (Psal. 110. 3)
speaks to the Almighty. "Thy people
shall be willing in the day of thy power."
He doth not say, they shall be
made willing; the word made is not
there, neither has it any business there,
Again, those little words in italic letters
were not in the original, but were put in
by the translators, to make what they
think to be sense in the English language;
and those little words "shall be,"
are in different letters, of course put in
by the translators; now I leave them
out, and in lieu thereof, put in the word
are, and then read it, "Thy people are
willing in the day of thy power." Now is
the day of God's power, and now his
people are willing; they are always a
willing people. It is the reprobate
character that is unwilling that God's
will should be done; this is the truth,
==> and you cannot deny it. Matt. 9.
24, 26. Object. Christ did not pray for
all mankind, &c. Answer. That's a
lie, for John 17.9. sayeth Christ prayed
( 55 )
for his disciples; Secondly, v. 20, for those
who should believe on him through their
word; and thirdly, for the whole world,
(v. 21, 23.) thus "that the world may
believe that thou hast sent me." Again,
that the world may know that thou hast
sent me, and this doth not mean, A double
L, part. Objec. Paul says, Rom. 8.
Whom God foreknew he predestinated,
called, justified, and glorified, &c. --
Here is no condition expressed, of
course, it appeareth that he glorified all
that he justified, called, predestinated,
and foreknew, &c. Ans. If that be taken
just as it stands, without any conditions
whatever, it will follow that Universalism
is true, or else, that we are all reprobates.
For God foreknows one as
much as another, in every sense of the
word, and of course foreknows all mankind;
and now, if all that he foreknows
he predestinates, calls, justifies, and glorifies,
without any condition, in any
shape, or sense, it undeniably argues, the
universal salvation of every son of Adam.
This is the truth, ==> and you cannot
deny it. Or else, if you take the Apostle
unconditionally, as he speaketh in the
( 56 )
past tense, then no more can be glorified.
Therefore we are reprobates. But
it is my opinion, that Paul is only rehearsing
a catalogue of states, as they
take place in succession. And to take
any particular part of the Bible, in the
face and eyes of twenty scriptures more;
and doctrine thereby may be proved:
and thus we find by such means, have
sprung up the many sentiments in the
earth. People, desirous to get to Heaven
in an easier way, than God hath
pointed out, will hew out an opinion of
their own, a broken cistern, that can
hold no water, and will twist and bend
the scriptures to their sentiment, and
sometimes will have to grind the same,
and put it into a press, and press out a
construction of their own. But this will
not do, scripture must be explained by
scripture, and that according to reason
so as not to make it clash, but rather
correspond with true christian experience.
Objec. We read as many as were ordained
to eternal life, believed. Answer.
True, but the word ordained, signifies,
set a part as a minister for his office.
Thus Jeremiah was set apart a
( 57 )
Prophet. And David saith, the Lord
has set apart him that is Godly for himself,
Psal. 4. 3. And there is no account
of any being set a part for the
Lord's self but the Godly. No man is
Godly or Godlike, but the believer;
therefore, none are ordained, or set apart
for Heaven, but those that believe.
Besides, the Acts of the Apostles were
written some time after the things took
place, and of course is all written in the
past tense. Ordained is in the past tense,
and so is believed, and there is no account
of the one being prior to the other. But
it may be said, as many as believed,
were ordained to eternal life, as none
are ordained or set apart for eternal life,
but the saints; no man is a saint except
he believes. For he that believeth not
is condemned already, saith Christ. --
Therefore, as soon as one believes, he is
free from condemnation, and of course
set apart for Heaven, and not before;
he being in Christ now, by the act of
faith. Now observe, Peter talks about
elect in Christ, not out of him -- Paul
saith, 2. Cor. 5. 17. If any man be in
Christ, he is a new creature, &c. and
Rom. 8. 1. saith, there is now (not yesterday
( 58 )
or to-morrow) no condemnation to
them which are in Christ Jesus; who
walk not after the flesh but after the spirit,
&c. which implies, there is condemnation
to those who are not in Christ,
but walk after the flesh, and not after
the Spirit. And Paul saith, -- they
which have not the Spirit of Christ,
are none of his, Rom. 8. 9. And John
saith, -- he that committeth sin, is of
the Devil, 1 John 3. 8; and again, no
man can call Jesus Lord, but by the
Holy Ghost. May God help thee to
consider the above candidly, and judge
impartially, and improve thereon conscientiously;
that it may be well with
the in thy latter moments. God grant
it for Christ's sake! Amen.
Objec. Him being delivered by the
determinate council, and foreknowledge
of God, &c.
Answer. I disagree with some who
think the determination there alluded to
the Jew's crucifying of Christ, &c. for if
that was decreed, it was right, and of
course it was not wrong; and then how
could it be sin, or how could they be
blame worthy, or punishable? But as
Christ said, "No man taketh my life
( 59 )
from me," &c. I therefrom argue, that it
was the sins of the world being laid on
Christ, that caused the blood to gush
through the pores of his skin, and run
down like drops of sweat, through the
agony of his mind. The same caused
him to say my soul is exceeding sorrowful,
even unto death, and likewise to
die so much sooner than malefactors in
general do; so that the governor himself
was astonished, and could hardly
credit the account, until he had enquired
of the centurian, if he were already
dead. I think that that passage which
saith, him being delivered, &c. has an
allusion to the determination of God,
when being resolved to send a mediator
into thisÊworld, for Adam's lost race,
which were in his loins, when God
manifested, that the seed of the woman,
should bruise the serpent's head, &c. --
This I argue from John 3. 16 and 17.
For God so loved the world, that he
gave his only begotten Son, and sent
him into the world, that the world thro
him might be saved, &c. For, observe,
all the blessings were forfeited by
Adam's sin, and of course the curse rested
( 60 )
on him, and all that he represented;
therefore, these blessings could not be
enjoyed except they were purchased;
God's justice demanding infinite satisfaction.
A finite being could not make
satisfaction beyond his own finite sphere,
of course, if there should be no Mediator,
God's declarative glory must be
greatly eclipsed, seeing that he could
not be glorified in the salvation or damnation
of any, except Adam and Eve;
and thereby the plan of Satan would
have been accomplished. Some people
say, that there are infants in hell not
more than a span long, for Adam's disobedience.
But I deny it, upon the
principles of scripture and common
sense. I acknowledge, however, it
would have been just in God to have
damned Adam and Eve, for their own
sins, but to have suffered Adam and
Eve to multiply, and punish their posterity
with an actual punishment, for
that which they were passive in procuring;
would represent God as unjust;
for the principles of true justice say,
that the punishment should never exceed
the transgression; therefore we being
passive in Adam's loins when he fell
( 61 )
we must have been passive in the punishment,
and of course have perished
there. This, in my opinion, would
have here left the loss we should have suffered;
because that all the blessings
we enjoy come through Christ's merit.
Of course, if it had not been for that
merit, I should not have had my temporal
life, which is a blessing. Of course
God could not have been glorified
in my salvation or damnation. If
not then as above, his glory would be
eclipsed, but his love for his own glory,
and to fallen man, caused him to determine
to send his Son as a Mediator. --
And he revealed the same according to
Gen. 3. 15; John 3. 16, 17; Acts 2. 23;
and on the principles of scripture, I acknowledge,
we feel the effect of Adam's
fall in our experience; but not the guilt
of it, for the demand of the Adamic law,
was satisfied by Christ, so as to remove
the curse, that we might enjoy the blessings
forfeited by Adam; not by works of
our own merit, but a simple act of faith
in Christ. Therefore the plaister is as
great the wound, according to Rom.
6. 18, 19. Therefore, as by the offence
( 62 )
of one, judgment came upon all men to
condemnation, even so (not uneven) by
the righteousness of one, the free gift
came upon ALL men, unto justification
of life, &c. &c. Also, Isai. 53. 6. Thus
you see the bible points out free grace,
to extend as far as just wrath. ==> and
you cannot deny it.
Query. If all things are decreed right,
is it not evident that there is no such
thing as sin or guilt? For it can't be
wrong to do right. Consequently,
there can be no redemption, for there is nothing
to redeem them from; consequently,
if mankind think they have sinned
and are redeemed, their thoughts must
be a deception, and are imaginary; and
of course, their praising God for redeeming
love is folly. For they praise him
for that which he never did. Now, supposing
this imaginary, false, mistaken
idea, that they "had been sinners and
were redeemed," was removed, and they
so enlightened as to discover that nothing
according to right decrees had ever
taken place wrong, &c. how would the
heavenly host be astonished to think
they had been deceived? What silence
would immediately ensue!
( 63 )
Some people hold to a falling from
grace, which I think is wrong; for say
they, if we were always to be in the
light, we should grow proud; therefore
it is necessary that we should have darkness
to make us feel our weakness and
dependance. From this it appears, that
they think a little sin is necessary for the
perfecting of the saints. Now to hold a
thing necessary, implies holding to it,
same as I think perfection in love to be
necessary, therefore I hold to it. Thus
you see they hold to a falling from grace
which I think is wrong. Yet I adopt
the idea that a man can fall from grace
according to conscience, reason and
scripture, which idea, some people think
to be dangerous; but I think it is not
naturally attended with such bad consequences
as the other; for if a man thinks
he is safe, he is not apt to look out for
danger, whereas if he thinks there is
danger, he is apt, like the mariner, to
look out for breakers. Again, supposing
I have religion, I think I can fall so
as to perish everlastingly. Here is another
man with the same degree of religion
believing once in grace, always in
grace. Now, if my idea of the possibility
( 64 )
of falling, &c. be false, his sentiment
if true, will certainly catch me; so I am
safe as he. But supposing his doctrine
to be false, and mine true; he is gone
for it, and mine will not catch him.
So you see I have two strings to my
bow to his one. ==> This is the truth,
and you cannot deny it. Now reader,
observe, as I heard of a seine on Rhode-
Island, which caught a school of fish,
and for fear of the escape of some, a
number of seines encircled and enclosed,
so that they could not escape, and if any
did escape the first or second net, the
others should catch them, &c. So you
may plainly discover as I have linked
the above doctrines, if my ideas are false,
the other ideas, as so many seines, will
catch me. Once in grace, always in grace,
or predestination, or universalism, or
deism, with atheism. But if they are
false, those characters are gone, if they
have nothing else to depend upon but
principles -- yet I shall be safe.
Again, it is evident to reason's eye,
that the more light a person hath, if he
abuse the same, the greater is the sin
and guilt. Therefore, in justice, the
condemnation and punishment must be
( 65 )
propositioned, according to the saying of
Christ, "He that knoweth his master's
will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten
with many stripes;" -- whereas he that
committeth things worthy of stripes, and
knoweth not his master's will, shall be
beaten with few stripes. Thus you see
it is required according to what a man
hath, and not according to what he hath
not. As we read every man is to be rewarded
according to his works, or the
deeds done in the body, Rev. 22. 12,
and 14. 13; Luke 12. 47, &c. Now
scripture proof that a man may fall from
grace, runneth thus: "if any man draw
back, my soul shall have no pleasure in
him." The backslider in heart, shall be
filled with his own ways, &c. Now if a
man were in a high pillory, it would be
nonsense for one to cry out, "hold tight,
stand and hang fast, for if you fall, it
will hurt you;" if there be no danger
of his failing, and more so, if there is
not a possibility of it. If so, then how
much greater nonsense, for an Almighty
God, to give us his will, with many
cautions as needless as the above, there
being no danger, nor even a possibility
of danger. And yet he like some passionate
( 66 )
parents, who say to their children,
if you do so and so, I'll whip you; I'll
burn you up; I'll skin you, and turn
you out doors, &c. and yet have no intention
to perform the threatenings, but
to lie to them. Just such a character
some people seem to represent the Lord
in. When he cautions as follows: --
Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eateth
thereof thou shalt die, (Serpent
like say they,) Gen. 3. 4. Ye shall not
surely die. But it is evident that God
is in earnest in the following threatenings:
Rev. 22. 19. If any man shall
take away from the words of the book of
this prophecy, God shall take away his
part out of the book of life, and out of
the Holy City, &c. there is no account
of a sinner's having a part in the book of life,
or Holy City, but the saint. For it
is holiness that gives the title, Heb. 12.
14. Again, hold fast that no man take
thy crown, &c. Rev. 3. 11. Be thou
faithful unto death, and I will give thee
a crown of life -- And he that endureth
to the end, the same shall be saved, Rev.
2. 10; Mark 13. 13. Jude tells us of
some whose fruit withereth, twice dead,
plucked up by the roots. Now it is
( 67 )
evident, that a sinner is but once dead,
then there must have been once alive in
the scripture or scriptural sense; or else
how could the fruit wither, or they be
twice dead and plucked up by the roots?
ver. 12. Again there is a sin unto death,
which we are not commanded to pray
for: compare 1st John 5. 16, 17, with
Heb. 10. 26 to 31. Again, Peter tells
us of some that have forgotten that they
were purged from their old sins, and
even escaped the pollutions of the world,
through the knowledge of Christ, &c. --
and yet are again entangled therein.
And saith he, it had been better for
them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than after they have
known it, to turn from, &c. (2 Pet.
1. 9, and 2 c. 20 v. to the end) how
could they have forgot that which
they knew, &c. Again, (Heb. 6. 4,
to 7th) what higher attainments can one
have than are here mentioned -- and
(2 Peter 3. 17, &c.) if any man thinketh
he standeth, let him take heed lest
he fall, (1 Corin. 10. 12. Rom. 11. 20,
21. Heb. 4. 1.) Observe, there were
six hundred thousand Jews, all well,
active men, &c. which come out of Egypt
( 68 )
with Moses, and one was in as fair
a way for Canaan as another; and God
promised as positively to carry them to
the promised land, as ever he promised
to carry the saint from earth to heaven;
only four got through the wilderness. --
Aaron and Moses died on the mountains,
and Caleb and Joshua reached the
desired country. But all the others,
who it appears, were once favorites of
Heaven, from Paul's talk, 1 Cor. 10. 3,
4. &c. As Paul saith, they all drank of
Christ, the spiritual rock, &c. and yet
some of them tempted him, &c. verse 9,
and thus they all by sin fell in the wilderness.
And Paul addeth, moreover,
that these things happened unto them
for examples, and were written for our
admonition, verse 11. Now what need
of saints being admonished, if there be
no danger of losing the spiritual land of
rest? Paul was afraid of falling, chap.
9, 27th verse; but observe, though God
had promised to carry the Jews to Canaan,
&c. yet there was a condition implied,
Numb. 14. 34; and ye shall
know my breach of promise. That was
a condition implied, though not fully
expressed before. Gen. 17, 8 and 28,
( 69 )
13 and 50; 24, 25; Heb. 11. 2; Ex.
3. 16, 17, &c. and Lev. 26, 27, 26, &c.
Hark! If ye will not for all this, hearken
unto me (saith God) but walk contrary
unto me, then I will walk contrary
unto you also in fury, and I, even I, will
chastise you seven times for your sins.
Now if all things are decreed right
straight forward, how could the Jews
walk contrary to God? and if not, how
could God walk contrary to them? God
help thee to consider this, if there be no
condition implied; and likewise, Exod.
13. 17; and Numb. 14. 21, 22, 23, and
24, &c. Because those men, which
have seen my glory, and miracles which
I did in Egypt and in the wilderness,
and have tempted me now these ten
times, and have not hearkened to my
voice, surely they shall not see the land
which I swear unto their fathers, &c.
verse 34. God help you to take warning
by the Jews, for it is evident, that
according to the talk of Moses, Deut. 28.
that great blessings were promised, if
the nation would obey, and curses in
consequence of disobedience, which
ideas were confirmed in the dying speech
of Joshua, 24. 20; which was fulfilled
( 70 )
according to the book of Judges. --
When it went well with the Jews, we
find they were serving God; but when
they did evil, God sold them into the
hands of their enemies. God help thee
to compare the promises and threatenings
in Deuteronomy, to the book of
Judges, &c. And observe God's dealings
thenceward, and apply that to Mat.
7. 24, &c. and observe the Gospel, for
we are to take warning by God's dealings
with the ancients, and square our
lives accordingly, because to judgment
we must come, and be judged with strict
justice, and receive sentence accordingly;
either "Come ye blessed, or depart
ye cursed," Math. 25. 34, 41, &c. --
Now observe, if I am guilty, I must have
pardon here, and then if my life from
the day of my forgiveness, brings forth
good fruit from a holy heart, it is right;
consequently the reward must ensue accordingly.
But if I turn, and willingly
love sin again, my conduct flowing from
that evil desire, thus living and dying,
my sentence must be accordingly, agreeable
to the principles of true justice;
==> this is the truth, and you cannot deny
it. Read attentively about the good
( 71 )
and civil servant, from Math. 24. 46 to
48, &c. and 18. 23, &c.
Observe, Paul exhorts Timothy to
war a good warfare, holding faith and a
good conscience, which, faith he, some
having put away concerning faith, have
made shipwreck; of whom is Hymenius
and Alexander, 1 Tim. 1. 19; John 15;
Christ saith, "I am the true vine, and
my Father is the Husbandman; every
branch in me that beareth not fruit, he
taketh away, (observe, he could not take
them away unless they were there) and
every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it,
that it may bring forth more
fruit. Now ye are clean, through the
word which I have spoken unto you." --
Observe, a sinner is not clean, but filthy.
But if these were made clean thro' the
word of Christ, as just mentioned, then
they were saints, ==> and you cannot deny
it; verse 4. "Abide in me, and I
in you." As the branch cannot bear
fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine,
no more can ye, except ye abide in me,
I am the vine, ye are the branches, &c.
verse 6, "If a man abide not in me, he
is cast forth as a branch, and is withered,"
( 72 )
&c. Observe, a sinner is not
compared to a green tree, but a dry, this
could not wither, except it were green,
and a branch once withered, it is hard
to make it green again, &c. but they are
gathered and burned -- verse 7. 8; if ye
abide in me, and my words abide in you,
ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be
done unto you; herein is my Father
glorified, that ye bear much fruit, so
shall ye be my disciples; verse 9 -- Continue
ye in my love. -- Now ye may see
that, the five little letters that are herein
included, which too many people
overlook, and which fixes the sense of
a great many scriptures running parallel
thro the bible, &c. -- viz: "If and eth."
Now the Bible runneth thus: if ye do
so and so, I will do so and so; and if
ye do so and so, I will do so and so, &c.
And again. "ed" past tense, we find but
little in the Bible. But the scripture,
instead of making a "yesterday christian
it maketh a present, every day christian."
Thus, he that believeth, heareth,
seeth, understandeth, knoweth, pursueth,
watcheth, hath, enjoyeth, and endureth;
this is the truth, ==> and you
can't deny it, for the Bible doth not enquire
( 73 )
what I was yesterday, but what I
am now.
Objection. Christ saith, my sheep
hear my voice, they follow me, and shall
never perish, neither shall any man
pluck them out of my hand, &c. John
10. 27, 28. Answer -- Here the saint
is represented by the similitude of a
sheep, hearing and following a shepherd;
and observe the promise is made
as before observed, to a certain obedient
character, and here the promise is to
those that hear; hearing doth not mean
stopping your ears, or being careless and
inattentive; but it implieth, giving strict
attention to the object, which requireth
the fame, and following, likewise, doth
not mean running the other way, but a
voluntary coming after -- Therefore,
there is a condition implied and expressed
in this passage, vis: hear and follow,
and the promise is to that character: of
course, a backslider doth not initiate it,
and of course, cannot claim the promise;
and though Christ saith none can
pluck them from his hands, &c. yet he
doth not say, but what they may turn
away according to Ezek. 33. 18. --
( 74 )
"When the righteous (man) turneth
from his righteousness, and committeth
iniquity, he shall even die thereby," &c.
Object. The death there spoken of is
temporal. Ans. I deny it, for the body
will die, whether you sin or not; and
God, when he meaneth the body, doth
not say the soul, but positively declares,
"the soul that sinneth, it shall die" -- chap. 16. 4.
Objec. But the righteous man then
spoken of, is a self righteous man. Ans.
I deny it, for he is pronounced a righteous
man by God himself, and how can
he be righteous in the judgment of God,
without saving faith? God doth not
call a wicked man good, nor a good man
evil, yet you say, that him that God
here pronounceth righteous, is only self
righteous, a Pharisee. Oh scandalous
for any man to twist the scriptures thus!
Now look at it in your own glass; self-
righteousness being wickedness, we will
stile it iniquity, and the man an iniquitous
man, and then read it "when an
iniquitous man turneth away from his
iniquity, and committeth iniquity, for
his iniquity, &c. shall he die" -- read the
above twice over, and then sound and
( 75 )
see, if there be any bottom or top according
to your exposition. Leaving your
shameless construction, I pass on to answer
another objection, which may be
urged from Rom. 8. 38, 39. where Paul
saith, "I am persuaded, that neither
death nor life, nor angels, principalities,
powers, things present or to come, nor
height, nor depth, nor any other creature,
shall be able to separate us from
the love of God, &c."
Observe, though Paul speaks of a second
cause, not being able to separate
us from the enjoyment of God's love;
yet he doth not say but what we may
separate ourselves by disobedience,
which is sin. Sin is not a creature as
some people falsely think, but sin is a
non-conformity to the will of God. --
If you still say, that sin is a creature,
I ask you what shape it is in, or
what colour it is of, or how many
eyes or wings, it hath, or whether it
crawls like a snake: Paul doth not term
it a creature, but agreeth with St. John,
where he saith, sin is the transgression of
the law, and where there is no law, there
is no transgression; and being not without
law to God, but under the law of
( 76 )
Christ. The Christian still feeleth himself
conscientiously accountable unto
God, ==> and you cannot deny it. --
1 John, 3. 4. Rom. 3. 20 and c. 4. 15.
1 Corin. 9. 21 for we read, not that a
good man falleth into sin every day, and
still is in the way to Heaven, being a
child of God, but in the reverse -- 1 John
3. 8. "he that committeth sin, is of the
Devil, John 8. 34. whomsoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin" -- v. 36.
"if the sin therefore shall make you
free, you shall be free indeed." Rom.
6. 18. "being then made free from sin,
ye became the servants of righteousness,
v. 20, for when you were the servants of
sin, you were free from righteousness;
v. 22, 23, but now being made free from
sin, &c. for the wages of sin is death."
Any person by reading the 89th Psal.
may plainly discover, that the promise
made therein to David, as in the person
of Christ, was not altogether without
condition, by comparing the promise
from v. 19, 20, to 29. &c. to 38. From
that, either there is a contradiction in
the Psalm, or else a condition must be
allowed; for one part saith, that his
seeds and throne shall endure forever --
( 77 )
and another part "thou hast cast his
throne to the ground" v. 36 and 44, &c.
But observe, most people when quoting
this Psalm, to prove once in Grace, always
in Grace, read thus, v. 33, "nevertheless
will I not utterly take from
them nor suffer my faithfulness to fail,"
which is a wrong quotation: He does
not say in the plural, he will not take
it from them, but in the singular, will
not utterly take from him; that is, from
Christ Jesus, as David frequently represents
Christ -- compare this Psalm
with 1 Chron. 28. 6, 7, 8. Kings, 9. 4.
to 9 -- where understandably, you will find
the condition.
Objec. I have loved thee with an
everlasting love, and he that believeth,
hath everlasting life. Ans. The life
there spoken of, is the love of God, which
is called everlasting; because it is his
eternal nature, which all those that believe
enjoy; yet, God being holy, cannot
behold iniquity with allowance; of
course his justice cries against it, and
demands satisfaction: It must be, that
if I lose that life, that the nature of it
does not change, but returns to God,
( 78 )
who gave it; by my outsinning, the
day or reach of mercy, &c. But says
one, can a man sin beyond the love of
God, or out of the reach of mercy?
Ans. We read that God loved the world
and yet that there is a sin unto death,
which we are not commanded to pray
for, when one committeth. John 3. 16, 17.
1 John 5. 16. Those who may
read the above, that have enjoyed the
comforts of religion in their own souls,
when they are faithful to God, they feel
his love, and enjoy the light of his
countenance; and a mountain of trouble
appears as a hill, and he surmounts it
with delight, and cries in the Poet's
language
"Give joy or grief, give ease or pain
"Take life or friends away;
"But let me find them all again,
"In that eternal day."
They feel the truth of Christ's words,
John 6. 12. "He that followeth me,
shall not walk in darkness, but shall have
the light of life," but when they let
down their watch, that their strength departs
like Sampson's, when shorn and their
enemies get the better: A hill of trouble
( 79 )
appears as a mountain, and they feel
like one forsaken; and on reflection,
conscience lays the blame not on God,
like the doctrine of decrees, but on
them; and they have no peace until
they repent, and do their first work, viz.
to go to God as a criminal, and yet as a
beggar, broken hearted, willing to part
with the accursed thing -- then they find
the Lord to lift upon them the light of
his countenance, and their peaceful
hours return. They take their harps
from the willows, and cry like the ancient,
"our soul is escaped, as a bird from
the snare of the fowler, the snare is broken,
and we are escaped."
Query -- Who ever fell from Grace?
Ans. We are informed, 1 Sam. 15, 17.
that when Saul was little in his own
eyes, God exalted him to be king over
Israel, and c. 10. 6. when Samuel anointed
him, he saith, "the spirit of the
Lord will come upon thee, and thou
shalt prophecy, and shall be turned into
another man, &c." v. 9. we read moreover,
that God gave him another heart,
&c. and what sort of a heart God gives,
I leave you to judge. And God seemed
( 80 )
to prosper Saul, while he was humble,
c. 13. 12. It appeareth after two years,
that his heart got lifted up with pride,
and the Lord sent him to utterly destroy
the Amelekites, and all things belonging
thereto, according to the commandments
by Moses: But Saul rebelled, and committed
a sin thereby, which was as the
sin of witchcraft and idolatry, c. 15. 23.
After this, the Spirit of the Lord departed
from him; and afterwards Saul
murdered himself in the field of battle.
And we read, no murderer hath eternal
life abiding in him; and that murderers
hereafter shall be shut out of the
Holy City, c. 16. 14. and 31. 4. 1 John
3. 15, Rev. 22, 15. But saith one, was
not David a man after God's own heart,
when committing adultery and murder?
Ans. No, for God hath not the heart of
an adulterer, nor a murderer. And
again, no murderer hath eternal life
abiding in him, 1 John 3. 15: And
supposing David was a man after God's
own heart, when feeding his Father's
sheep; that's no sign he was, when
committing adultery and murder, any
more than if I were honest seven years
ago, and then turned thief -- am honest
( 81 )
still, because I was once; this is the
truth ., ==> and you cannot deny it. But
observe, the Lord was displeased with
David, being angry with the wicked every
day: and there is no account that
the Lord put away David's sin until he
confessed it, &c. 2 Sam. 11. 27, and 12.
13; and all backsliders who sincerely
repent, may receive pardon, as David
did, &c. But yet, there is no scripture
that saith, they shall be brought to repentance
irresistibly, whether they will
or not; for God will have volunteers for
Heaven; or none at all, Rev. 22. 14, 17.
We can't with reason suppose, that a
king would choose an enemy as an ambassador,
with an embassage to rebels,
with propriety, that God or Christ
would call an enemy, a child of the devil,
to go and preach and do miracles;
but a friend. Yet we find in Mat. 10,
that Judas with the others, was positively
called, and commanded to preach,
and had power to raise the dead, heal
the sick, and cast out devils, &c. And
the twelve went out, and returned, &c.
It speaks of them collectively, but not
individually, doing miracles till after
( 82 )
Christ's resurrection. Chapter 19, Peter
saith, we have foresaken all (not I) and
followed thee, what shall we have therefore?
Christ answereth, verse 28, Verily
(or certainly) I say unto you, that
ye which have followed me in the regeneration.
when the son of man shall set in
the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit
upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve
tribes of Israel. Now I ask, how they
could follow Christ in the regeneration,
except they were regenerated, i. e. born
again? Doth it not mean Judas for
one, seeing there were twelve apostles,
twelve thrones, and twelve tribes. A
throne for each; but it appeareth that
the thrones were promised on conditions
of overcoming. Rev. 3. 21; and
that Judas forfeited his title by disobedience,
&c. But saith one, "I thought
Judas was raised up for the very purpose,
to betray Christ, and was always a
wicked man," -- Ans. -- Many people
think so, through the prejudice of education,
and set up their opinion for the
standard, and attempt to bend the scriptures
to it, but that will not do: for
truth will stand when error falls, and of
course our tenets should correspond with
( 83 )
the Bible, which doth not say, that Judas
was always evil: but Christ conveys
an idea to the reverse, when referring
to John 13. 18, to Psal. 41. 9:
where David is speaking of Judas, as in
the person of Christ; and faith, "Mine
own familiar friend, in whom I trusted,
which did eat my bread, hath lift up
his heel against me." Here Judas is
not only stiled Christ's friend, but his
familiar one, in whom he trusted. Now
can we suppose with propriety, that
Christ would be familiar with the deceitful,
and put confidence in them?
No! methinks he would have set a better example.
Objection. Christ says, John 6. 70th,
have I not chosen you twelve, and one
of you is a devil.
Ans. Sometimes Christ spoke as man,
and sometimes as God, and God frequently
speaks of things that are not,
as tho they were; for instance, Rev. 13.
8, we read that Christ was a Lamb slain
from the foundation of the world, and
yet he was not actually slain till four
thousand years after.
Again, God said to Abraham: I have
made thee a Father of many nations,
( 84 )
when he was the father of but one child
(Ishmael). So Christ foreseeing as God,
that Satan would enter into Judas,
spoke it, as if it was in the present tense;
tho it was not really so, for some time
after; there was more trust put in Judas
than in the other Apostles, he being
made treasurer. We have repeated accounts
of Peter, James and John, sinning;
but no account that Judas did
until six days before the Passover, John
12, Mark 14. 3. when our Lord was in
the house of Simeon, the Leper, which
appears to be Judas' Father's house, in
came a woman to anoint Christ, &c. and
it appears that Judas felt a thievish, covetous
disposition to arise; and from
that no doubt he was called a thief,
and had the bag, for he never was
called a thief before; and Christ gave
him a gentle rebuke, and it appears that
Judas got affronted by his complying
with a suggestion of Satan. (Satan was
not really in him yet, only tempted him)
And going out the same day, he made a
bargain, John 13. 2. and Mark 14. 10.
(like some ministers) saying what will
ye give me, and I will deliver him unto
( 85 )
you, &c. Some people make scripture
and say, whom Christ loves, he loves to
the end (to the end of what?) There are
no such words in the Bible -- John 13. 1,
we read thus: "When Jesus knew that
his hour was come, that he should depart
out of this world unto the Father,
having loved his own, which were in
the world, he loved them unto the end;"
namely, the night in which the sacrament
was instituted. Judas being present,
&c. received the sop, after which
Satan entered him, verse 27. And now
it may be said in the full sense of the
word, that he was a devil, and not before,
unless you allow of his being one
before, and another entering him now,
and so make a double devil of him --
and what sort of a being that may be, I
cannot tell.
I think if Judas had regeneration,
or was ever a friend to Christ,
as you talk from Matt. 19. 28, 29. and
Psalms, 41. 9. "that he is gone to glory." --
Ans. No, he has not, for Christ
affirmed, "woe to that man, good were
it for that man if he had never been
born." Mark 14. 21. Luke 22. 19, 20.
Again, we read Judas murdered himself,
( 86 )
and no murderer hath eternal life abiding
in him. -- Object. I do not think
one that is given to Christ can be lost.
Ans. Then you do not believe the bible,
for we read, John, 17. 12. that Judas
was given to Christ, and yet he is
lost, and stiled a son of Perdition, which
means a son of Destruction -- and Acts,
1. 24, 25. where the eleven surviving
Apostles, chose Matthias to fill up Judas'
sphere, no more or less than what
Judas did; they prayed thus, "Thou
Lord, which knoweth the hearts of all
men, shew whither of these two thou
hast chosen, that he may take part of
this ministry and apostleship, from
which, Judas by transfiguration fell, &c."
Now, if Judas were already a devil,
(which could not be, for there must have
been a time when he began to be one.)
why would they choose a good man to
fill up a devil's place? Observe, there
were twelve parts of the ministry, and
the Apostles being accountable persons
to God. Judas fell by transgression.
Now, what did he fall from? An old
profession -- to fall from an old profession
is no transgression at all; for transgression
is sin, which implies the violation
( 87 )
of a known law; of course, falling
by transgression, implies losing something
which is valuable, by misconduct,
&c. this is the truth, ==> and you cannot
deny it. But says one, I don't like
your talk, for you destroy my comfort;
and it is a discouraging doctrine against
getting religion, if one thinks they can
lose it after they get it: Answer, I
might on the other hand, or in another
case say, that it is discouraging against
getting money, or buying this farm, or
that horse, for perhaps it may be squandered,
lost or die; therefore I would not
try for them. What would you think
of the man that would stop and be negligent
at such objections? People temporally
do not term such things discouraging,
so as to flee, and methinks none
will make that reply; but those who
love and plead for a little sin; one leak
will sink a ship.
Object. Solomon was a wise man,
and yet did many things wrong; and
yet wrote Ecclesiastes afterward, from
which we may infer, no doubt he is happy.
Ans. Solomon, no doubt was a
wise man, above all the kings of the
earth, and yet became the greatest fool
( 88 )
by abusing his wisdom; for after that
God had done so much for Solomon --
Solomon turned and committed sin;
and according to the Mosaic law, was
worthy of temporal death in five respects:
First, he made an affinity with
Pharoah, King of Egypt -- Secondly,
took his daughter to be his wife -- Thirdly,
made affinity with Hyram, king of
Tyre -- Fourthly, fell in love with heathenish
women, who turned his heart
from God -- Fifthly, he fell into idolatry.
He had four gods that he worshipped
himself, and others for his wives,
When Solomon was young, we read the
Lord loved him, but now he was old, we
read the Lord was angry with him; and
he is angry with the wicked every day.
The Lord endeavored to reclaim Solomon,
first by mercy, & then by affliction;
and raised up three adversaries for that
purpose -- but Solomon would not hear,
but went on a step farther, and attempted
to kill Jeroboam, who arose and fled
to Egypt: And as the scripture leaves
Solomon, he died in that state, with
murder in his heart, as he attempted to
slay the innocent; and no murderer has
eternal life abiding in him. And there
( 89 )
is no account of Solomon's repentance,
but that he died in his sins, and our
sins, where he is, we cannot come. And
David's dying words to Solomon were,
"If thou seek the Lord, he will be found
of thee; but if thou forsake him, he
will cast thee off forever." Solomon
fought the Lord, and the Lord appeared
to him twice; afterwards he forsook
God, and there is no account of his return,
as before observed: and as for
believing that Ecclesiates was wrote afterwards,
I no more believe Solomon
could write when he was dead, than I
believe I can; and to evade this answer,
and say Solomon wrote it when he was
old, I reply, it is no more than any old
man that swears or gets drunk can do,
to cry out vanity of vanities, &c. when
their lives become burthensome: But
what makes the beauty of Ecclesiates
is, to see that a young man could cry
out vanity, which is so contrary to nature,
when nature is so fond of it: And
as for the Book of Proverbs, any person
may discover they were wrote before the
building of the Temple, by turning to
( 90 )
the first of Kings, 4. 32, &c. and before
much of his wickedness. You need not
say, that I said that Solomon is gone to
hell. I did not affirm so; but I take Solomon
where the scripture doth, and
leave him where the scripture doth, in
the hand of a merciful God. Asking
why the Bible is so particular to put
down all the good conduct of Solomon,
and then his bad conduct, if he repented,
why was not that put down? Turn
to the history of Josephus, and it leaves
Solomon if possible, in a worse situation
than the Bible doth, &c.
Some people blame me for holding a
perfection, and at the same time they
hold to a stronger then me; and moreover,
for not holding to the final perseverance,
of the saints; which assertion
I think is wrong, for I think there is
danger of falling away -- therefore I
hold to perseverance ==> and they cannot
deny it. But they hold, a man cannot
get rid of sin: Here therefore they hold
to persevering in sin, and they hold to
falling from grace of course, ==> this is the
truth, and they cannot deny it. Some
have heard ministers pray to God, that
the people might be sanctified from all
( 91 )
sin: and then told them that they could
not get rid of all sin -- this was a clash.
People frequently feel good desires from
God to get rid of "all sin," James, 1. 17.
and yet they can't obtain the blessing,
so pray in unbelief for it. We
read, that whatsoever is not of faith, is
sin; therefore, if I hold with them, I
should pray thus, "Lord save me from
part of my sins now, and at death take
them all away," &c. But this doth not
correspond with the Lord's Prayer,
which commandeth us to pray that
God's Kingdom may come, and his
will be done, &c. as in Heaven; and
we delivered from evil.
The kingdom of God, we read, is not
meat and drink; but righteousness,
peace and joy in the Holy Ghost. And
Paul saith, this is the will of God, even
your sanctification: And if a man be
delivered from all evil, there is no sin
left -- And what's the benefit to pray for
it, if we can't have it? but in obedience
to the commandment to pray for
the deliverance from evil. Paul besought
God to sanctify the Thessalonians
wholly, and to preserve their whole spirit,
( 92 )
soul and body blameless unto the
coming of Christ, i. Thes. 5. 23; and
again, verse 16 to 18, he commandeth
them to rejoice, pray without
ceasing, in every thing give thanks, for
this is the will of God in Christ Jesus
concerning you: Math. 5. 48, Christ
saith, be ye perfect even as your Father
which is in Heaven is perfect, i. e. for
a man in our sphere, as perfect as God
is for God in his sphere: Again, be ye
holy, for I am holy: Again, the commandment
is to love the Lord with all
our heart, soul, mind and strength, and
our neighbor as our self, &c. And blessed
be God, the promise is equal to the
commandments; for God hath bound
himself by a promise. Ezek. 36. 25;
then will I sprinkle clean water upon
you, and ye shall be clean, from all
your filthiness, and from all your idols
will I cleanse you, a new heart also will
I give you, &c. Again Psalms 130. 8;
the promise is that Israel shall be redeemed
from her iniquities: John 8.
12, Christ saith, he that followeth me,
shall not walk in darkness, but shall
have the light of life: And again, God
hath promised by the hand of Moses,
( 93 )
thus "I will circumcise thy heart, and
the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord
with all thy heart," &c, and thy neighbour
as thyself. And Paul speaking of
the oath and the promise of God, two
immutable things, in which it is impossible
for God to lie. Now if God can't
lie, then he cannot do all things, especially
that which is contrary to his nature;
if so, then the above-mentioned
promises are equal to the commandments,
and God is bound by the law of
his nature to perform the same. This
is the truth, ==> and you cannot deny it.
Object. David saith, "There is none
righteous, no not one," -- Ans. True,
yet we read about righteous Abel, and
Lot's righteous soul (2 Pet. 2. 8. -- St.
Mat. 23. 35.) Object. Solomon saith,
"there is no man that sinneth not;" --
Ans. True, but John saith, he that is born
of God doth not commit sin. Object.
Paul saith, 'I am carnal, sold under sin;'
yet he was a saint. -- Ans. Paul addeth
elsewhere, "that the carnal mind is enmity
against God, and is not subject to his
law, neither indeed can be, and to be
carnally minded is death." Again,
"Christ came to save sinners, &c. of
( 94 )
whom I am chief." Now, to take these
expressions together, just as they stand,
you might prove that Paul was one of
the worst of men, in the way to death,
and at the same time one of the best
Apostles in the way to life, &c. Tho'
Paul saith, I am carnal, sold under sin,
yet it cannot be that he was speaking of
himself, as a holy Apostle; but was describing
or rehearsing the language of
one under the law, as you may see Romans 7.1:
"I speak to them that know
the law &c. but c. 8. 1, 2. Paul saith
there is therefore now no condemnation
to them which are in Christ Jesus, who
walk not after the flesh, but after the
spirit, for the law of the spirit of life in
Christ Jesus hath made me free from
the law of sin and death," -- And now,
if Paul was made free, he could not be
groaning under the bondage at the same
time, unless you can reconcile liberty
and slavery together. Paul saith in one
place, I robbed other churches. Now,
to take this passage just as it stands, and
you might prove that Paul was a robber;
if so, would not the Americans
hang him if he were here, as we hang robbers,
&c.
( 95 )
And to take any particular passage,
you may prove almost any doctrine, if
it be not taken in connection with the
context, or general tenor of scripture;
but as the Bible in general doth not
plead for sin, but condemneth it. commanding
us to be holy in heart and life,
&c. Therefore we should not plead for
sin as though we loved it, and rolled it
under our tongues as a sweet morsel,
but should be scripturians or Bible men,
for Paul telleth the Romans to whom
some think Paul made allowance for a
little sin, inferring it from the 7th chapter;
but, by the by, they should remember
that Paul talketh thus, "being
justified by faith, we have peace with
God; chap. 5. 1, and 6, 18, 22, he saith,
being made free from sin," &c. and being
now made free from sin, &c. --
==> Well says one, what next? Ans.
Any person by reading the Epistles of
John may find a sufficiency of proof to
convince any candid mind, that the doctrine
of Christian perfection in love, is
a Bible doctrine -- Query. How far can
a man be perfect in this life?
Ans. A perfect sinner by the help of
( 96 )
satan, ==> and you cannot deny it. --
Now, if a man can be a perfect sinner,
why not a perfect saint? Shall we not
allow as much power to God to perfect
his children in his own nature, which is
love, as the Devil has power to perfect
his in sin, &c? But, says one, answer
the former question, and likewise, whoever
attained what you are talking
about. Very well -- I'll tell you: I
think a man cannot be perfect as God,
except it be for men in our sphere,
as God is for God in his sphere; for
absolute perfection belongs to God
alone; neither as perfect as angels, or
even Adam before he fell, because I feel
the effect of Adam's fall, my body being
mortal, is a clog to my soul, and
frequently tends to weigh down my
mind, which infirmity I don't expect to
get rid of till my spirit returns to God,
yet I do believe that it is the privilege
of every saint, to drink in the spirit or
nature of God, so far as to live without
committing wilful or known or malicious
sins against God, but to have love the
ruling principle within, and what we say
and do, to flow from that divine principle
of love within, from a sense of duty
( 97 )
though subject to trials, temptations
and mistakes at the same time; and a
mistake in judgment, may occasion a
mistake in practice -- I may think a man
more pious than he is, and put too
much confidence in him, and thereby
be brought into trouble. Now such
mistake as this, and many other similar
ones, I might mention, you cannot term
sin with propriety; for when Eldad
and Medad prophesied in the camp, Joshua
mistaken in his judgment, thinking
they did wrong, occasioned a practical
mistake, requesting Moses to stop them,
&c. which was not granted. Observe,
One sin, shut Moses out of Canaan, of
course one sin must have shut him out,
but as God said, "Joshua wholly followed
him," and wholly not being partly,
and as he entered Canaan, from that circumstance,
I argue that a mistake following
from love, is not imputed as a sin. --
Again, as we are informed, that Christ
was tempted in all respects like as we
are, Heb. 4. 15. yet without sin, and
can be touched with feelings of our
infirmities, &c. Again, as we are commanded,
James 1. 2. to count it all joy
( 98 )
when we fall (not give way) into diverse
temptations. And if the devil, or wicked
men tempt me, and I reject and repel
the temptation with all my heart,
how can it be said that I sin? Am I to
blame for the devil's conduct? I can
no more prevent my thoughts, than I
can prevent the birds from flying over
my head; but I can prevent them from
making nests in my hair.
Some people expect purgatory to deliver
them from sin; but this would,
methinks, make discord in Heaven. --
Others think death will do it. If death
will deliver one from the lust of sin,
why not two? Why not all the world
by the same rule? So, universalism be
true, and death have the praise, and Jesus
Christ be out of the question? But
death is not called a friend but is stiled
an enemy, and it don't change the disposition
of the mind. All that death
does is to separate the soul from the body;
therefore as we must get rid of the
lust of sin, either here or hereafter, as
but few in America allow of purgatory,
it is before the soul leaves the body,
consequently it is in time, of course before
( 99 )
death. Now the query arises how
long first? Why says one, perhaps a
minute before the soul leaves the body.
Well, if a minute before, why not two
minutes, or an hour, yea, a day, a week,
a month, or a year, or even ten years
before death -- or even now? Is there
not power sufficient with God, or efficacy
enough in the blood of Christ? Certainly,
saith the scripture, all things are
now ready, no is the accepted time,
and behold now (not to-morrow) is the
day of salvation. To-day if you will
hear his voice. Remember now thy
Creator, in the days, &c. and there being
no encouragement in the Bible for
to-morrow, now is God's time ==> and
you cannot deny it, &c. Observe examples --
by faith Enoch walked with
God (not with sin) three hundred years,
and had the testimony that he pleased
God -- Gen. 5. 22. Heb. 11. 5. Caleb
and Joshua wholly followed (not partly)
the Lord -- Numb. 32 11, 12. Job
likewise, God said was a perfect man and
you must not contradict him; and tho'
Satan had as much power to kill Job's
wife, as to destroy the other thing, as
all except Job's life was in his hands, but
( 100 )
he tho't he would spare her for an instrument,
or a torment: Job, 1. 8, 12. 22,
and 2. c. 9, 10 v. David was a man after
God's own heart, when feeding his
father's sheep, not when he was committing
adultery -- 1 Sam. 13, 14, and 16,
7, 11 -- 2 Sam. 12. 13. Zacharias and
Elizabeth, were both righteous before
God, walking in all the commandments,
&c. blameless -- Luke, 1. 5, 6. Nathaniel
was an Israelite indeed, in whom
there was no guile, &c. John 1, 47. --
John speaking of himself, and those to
whom he wrote, "herein, is our love
made perfect, and perfect love casteth
out fear" -- 1 John, 4. 17, 18. Again,
of the seven Churches of Asia, five had
some reproof, but two had no reproof at
all; Smyrna and Philadelphia, why not
if they had a little sin; the latter was
highly commended, Rev. 2. 8, 9. and
8.7, and so on, &c.
Query -- Must we not get rid of all sin
before we go to glory? Don't we feel
desires for it? Did not God give us
those desires? Don't he command us
to pray for it? Should we not look in
expectation of receiving? God help
thee, without prejudice, to consider the
( 101 )
above impartially, as a sincere enquirer
after truth, let it come from whom it
may, intending to improve conscientiously
as for eternity -- Amen. Says one,
do you think a man can know his sin is
forgiven in this life, and have the evidence
of his acceptance with God? Answer --
We are informed he was righteous -- Gen.
4. 4. Heb. 11. 4. Enoch had the testimony --
v. 5. Job said, I know that
my Redeemer liveth, and though he slay
me, yet will I trust in him; Job 19. 25.
David said, "come unto me all ye that
fear the Lord, and I will tell you what
he hath done for my soul." "As far as
the East is from the West, so far hath the
Lord separated our sins from us." Psal.
66. 16. Peter said, John, 21. "Lord
thou knowest that I love thee." John
saith, "he that believeth on the Son of
God, hath the witness in himself." 1 John
5. 10. and Mat. 1. 25. Jesus shall save
his people (not in) but from their sins.
Again, John 3. 8. The wind bloweth
where it listeth, thou hearest the sound
thereof, &c. so is every one that is born
of the spirit. The wind, though we
don't see it, we feel and hear it, and see
( 102 )
the effects it produces, it wavers the
grass, &c. So the Spirit of God, we
feel it, it gives serious impressions, and
good desires within our breast for religion.
Again, we hear it, an inward
voice telling what is right and what is
wrong; and the more attention one
gives to the inward monitor, the more
distinctly they will hear the sound, till
at length it will become their teacher.
Again, we may see the effect it produces --
some that have been proud and
profligate, get reformed, and become
examples of piety; which change, money
could not have produced, &c. Says
another, I will acknowledge the ancients
could talk of the knowledge, but
inspiration is now done away: therefore.
it is nonsense to expect any such thing
in this our day. Answer. We read Jeremiah ,
31 c. 33, 34. v. of a time when
all shall know the Lord, from the least
to the greatest. Now, if there hath been
a time past, when people have known
God, and a time to come when all shall
know him; which time is not yet arrived.
Isai. 11. 9. Heb. 2. 14. Why
may not people know him in this our
day? nature has not changed, nor God
( 103 )
and if it matter still can operate on matter,
why not spirit upon spirit. Some people
are so much like fools, that they
think they are not bound in reason to
believe any thing except they can comprehend
it. This idea centers right in
Atheism; for the thing which comprehends,
is always greater than the thing
comprehended: Therefore, if we could
comprehend God, we should be greater
than he, and of course look down upon
him with contempt: but because we
can't comprehend him, then according
to the above ideas, we must disbelieve
and reject the idea of a God. The man
who so acts, supposes himself to be the
greatest, he comprehending all other
men or things, and of course he is God;
and many such a god there is, full of
conceit. Observe, I can know different
objects by the sensitive organs of the
eye, ear, &c. and tell whether they are
animate or inanimate; and yet how my
thinking power gets the idea, or comprehends
the same through the medium
of matter, is a thing I cannot comprehend;
yet it being such a self-evident
matter of fact, I must assent to the idea,
&c. But says one, who knows these
( 104 )
things in this our day? Ansr. the
Church of England prayeth to have
the thoughts of their hearts cleansed by
the inspiration of God's Holy Spirit,
and the Church of Rome, acknowledgeth
what is called the Apostles creed;
a part of which runneth thus: "I believe
in the communion of Saints, and
the forgiveness of sins." Again, the
above ideas are in the Presbyterian Catchism,
which saith, "that the assurance
of God's love, peace of conscience,
and joy in the Holy Ghost, doth accompany
or flow from justification, adoption,
and sanctification, in this life,"
(not the life to come.)
Again, what ever is, or exists abstract
from God, is finite. How or what God
conceives or knows of himself, or the
manner of his knowing, I shall not attempt
to fathom, till the day of eternity.
But relative to his knowledge, as it
concerns his creatures, I think the term
infinite improper, for he can know no
more than what hath been, is, and will
be, which are only finite in any and every
sense whatever. Therefore, to attempt
to build an eternal covenant, by
arguing or attempting to conceive his
( 105 )
infinite knowledge, is a contradiction.
For first, the term knowledge, implies a
power of perception, to know and comprehend
the existence of qualities, or
things, &c. -- therefore, in this sense,
when you speak of the knowledge of God
relative to creation, or his creatures, in
the sense they speak, you must necessarily
bound God's knowledge by finity, and
of course to apply the word infinite, &c.
to argue great knowledge is a contradiction,
==> and you can't deny it, because
there cannot be an infinite finite.
Again, to talk about an eternal covenant
between the Father and the Son
before all worlds, a bargain that Christ
should have a certain number of mankind,
which some call the elect, is a contradiction
in terms and a piece of inconsistency.
For first, a covenant is a contract
made between two parties, and
there can not be a covenant without two parties.
Therefore, to say the Father and Son
made a covenant, would be to adopt
the idea that there were two divinities,
which would divide the Godhead, and
of course argue two Gods. ==> and
you can't deny it.
( 106 )
But the Bible authorizes us to believe
in one God and no more. Again, if
the Father and Son made a covenant,
there was a time when they made it, and
if so, then there was a time before they
made it, consequently it was not made
from all eternity, unless you suppose
eternity implies unbeginning time.
Again, this covenant cannot be a new
one if it be so old, and a new covenant
of works made with Adam but six
thousand years ago, cannot be called an old
one; therefore, to term the oldest covenant
a new one, and the newest, the old
one, is a piece of inconsistency, like putting
the cart before the horse, => and
you can't deny it.
With regard to the soul of man,
some deny its immortality, whilst others
say it is a part of God; but I say
both.
Matter when it is moved by another
cause, cannot stop of itself, and when
stopped, cannot move of itself. But as
we have the power of action, (the same
as I give out my appointment months
before hand, and then fulfil it) it is evident
( 107 )
that we are prophets, or else
agents. To adopt the idea of prophesy,
you will not, and if not, you must
acknowledge agency, which material
substance, without thinking power, doth
not possess. From this I argue that
there is something in man abstract from
matter, which is spirit, which some call
the soul, and which makes him sensible
and rational, &c. And to suppose the
soul to be part of God, is inconsistent,
because God is completely happy, as is
acknowledged from the Christian to the
Deist. Therefore, if my soul was a part
of him, I should have one continual
stream of happiness.
But as I have frequently felt unhappy
in mind, I herefrom argue, that my
soul is spirit abstract from God.
Some people have an idea that the
souls of infants come right pure from
the hand of God, by infusion into the
body, and that the body, being of Adam's
race, pollutes the soul, and causes
it to become impure, just as of the body
governed the mind. Allowing the
above, When did God make the soul of
the child that was born yesterday?
( 108 )
Why, says one, within the course of a
few months past. Hush, I deny it, for
the Bible says, Gen. 2. 1, 2, 3, that
God finished the heavens (that is the
starry heavens) and earth and all the
HOST of them, and then God rested from
the works of creation on the seventh
day -- he hath not been at work in creating
new souls ever since. Therefore
your idea that God makes new souls
daily, falls to the ground; ==> and you
can't deny it, if the Bible be true.
But says one, their souls were made
in the course of six days.
Where then have they been ever
since? Laid up in a store-house in heaven?
If they were, they were happy;
if so, what kind of a being does this represent
the Almighty, especially if connected
with the opinion of some who
suppose that there infants in Hell,
not more than a span long!
First, God makes Adam happy in
Paradise, and these infantile souls happy
in a store house, then when Adam
falls, prohibits adultery, and at the same
time previously decrees that they shall
commit it to produce an illegitimate
body, and he to help them on to perfect
( 109 )
the illegitimate, takes one of these pure
souls, infuses it into the body, and the
body pollutes it, causes it to become impure,
and is now a reprobate for Hell
fire. Thus you see some people represent
God as making souls pure, and
keeping them happy some thousands of
years, then damning them for a sin they
never committed, and now the difference
between this BEING if any such
there be, that dealeth thus with creatures
and HIM that we call the Devil, I
leave you to judge. God help you to
look at it in the scale of equality, and
see whether the above be right or wrong.
But says one, where do you think
the soul comes from?
As Adam was the first man, I must
suppose from reason and scripture he got
his soul right from God, as there is no
other source for him to derive it from,
but Eve was taken out of Adam, and
there is no account of her receiving her
soul right from God; and if not, I must
suppose the whole of her was taken
from Adam and of course she got her
soul from him as well as her body. --
And as we read that the souls of Jacob's
( 110 )
children, Gen. 46, 26. were in Jacob's
loins and came out, &c. I herefrom infer,
that they were laid up in a stove
house in Heaven, but came by natural
generation from the parents as well as
the body. Well, says one, estimate the
value of the soul, (by mechanism.)
First, some people prize a thing according
as who made it, if one mechanic
made it, they prize it of so much worth,
but if another made it they would prize
it higher, because it was made by a more
perfect workman. If we prize the soul
by this standard, it must be considered
as valuable, because it was made by the
perfectest and the perfect, and the wisest
of the wise, him that cannot err, GOD
ALMIGHTY.
Secondly, some people value a thing
according to its duration. If the soul
be valued on that ground, it must be
prized high, for it being spirit, it is immortal
and must endure as long as eternity endures.
Thirdly, some people prize a thing
according to the case of it, if the soul be
prized on this ground, it must be esteemed
as valuable, for at a certain time
five millions were offered to any one,
( 111 )
who could contrive a machine that
would perform perpetual motion, and
as yet none have been able to do it, yet
in the construction of the case of the
soul, which is the body, there is more
discoverable than all the wisdom of the
mechanics, in all the machinery on the
face of this terraqueous globe.
If the case is thus wisely and beautifully
made, how valuable must the soul
be which the body is made to contain!
Fourthly, some people prize a thing
according to what it costs, if the soul be
prized according to this medium it must
be valuable, for if any smaller ransom
than the blood of Christ could have
purchased immortal souls, from the
course of a broken law, doubtless GOD
would have accepted the offering. --
Some people say that one drop of
Christ's blood is sufficient to cleanse a
soul, which idea I condemn, because the
magnitude of a crime is not looked upon
according to the dignity of the offender,
but according to the dignity of the offended;
therefore a finite being sinning against
an infinite GOD, there is an infinite
demerit in the transgression, and
justice demands infinite satisfaction. --
( 112 )
But a finite being can make finite satisfaction
only, therefore there needs a mediator
between a rebel creature and the
CREATOR, which could be formed no
way but by the two natures being joined
together, which is to say the finite
and the infinite, or in other words, the
Godhead and manhood or divinity veiled
in humanity.
But here comes up a diest, and says
hush, Lorenzo, it is inconsistent to adapt
the idea that divinity and humanity can
be joined together, as you talk in the
person of Christ. -- But I say hush, for
it is no more inconsistent with reason to
adapt the idea that divinity and humanity
can be joined together, than to
adapt a former one, which is self-evident,
viz. that spirit and matter can be
joined together, and form a man, which
idea, or how it is I cannot comprehend,
yet self-evident matter of fact, puts it
beyond all doubt, that spirit and matter
are joined to from man, ==> and you
can't deny it -- and of course, the idea
that divinity and humanity can be joined
together in the person of Christ, may
be admitted according to reason. The
manhood being offered up by the influence
( 113 )
of the divinity, the sacrifice would
be according to the transgression and the
demands of justice. But to return, I
cannot suppose that Christ would have
done any thing superstitious for man's
redemption, and of course, that one
drop of blood is sufficient to cleanse
a soul, or save a world, is inconsistent,
as though a considerable part of what he
did, was superfluity, &c. and of course
in atoning for what is called original
sin. I must believe that nothing needless
was done, if not, then Christ did no
more than what was necessary, and if so,
the idea that one drop of his blood, &c.
to cleanse a soul is inconsistent. And
if the demerit of one transgression demands
infinite satisfaction, then the
atonement made for that, would be a
sufficiency for all the world, or ten thousand
times as many; for what greater
satisfaction could be made, than that
which is infinite? Therefore, the human
nature being offered a sacrifice by
the influence of the divinity, for the SIN
of the world, which was the sin of Adam,
the sacrifice or ransom in some sense,
may be considered as infinity, it being
( 114 )
offered under the influence of the infinite
divine spirit; therefore, the satisfaction
would be according to the transgression,
and of course, in doing that,
there would be a sufficient provision, for
all the actual sins of men, considering
the nature of it, and how unbounded it
is. Therefore, the soul, when prized
according to what it cost, must be considered
very valuable.
But again, fifthly, some people prize
a thing according to the scarcity of it.
If a thing is very plenty, they would
give so much for it, but if it were more
scarce, they would give much more, &c.
So, immortal souls are plenty, and yet
very scarce, for each man hath but one,
each woman but one. O sinner,
if thou lose thy soul, thou losest thy
all; thou hast nothing left; God help
thee to consider seriously, and stimulate
thee to improve thy time, (which is on
the wheel) for eternity accordingly.
The soul, which we perceive governs
our body, (as the body without the soul,
is a lifeless lump of clay) we find from
experience hath a memory, which is the
power of reflection or recollection, to
call past things to remembrance, &c.
( 115 )
Again, it hath an understanding, which
is a power to comprehend and realize
things as they are; again, it hath a will
which is the power of choosing or determining.
We also have passions, one of which
is love, inclining us to that which appears
delightsome. Anger is another
passion, which implies dislike or opposition
to a thing that is odious in our
minds. Likewise we have fear when
danger we behold. Also, joy, when
pleasure or happiness we possess. --
There are five outward senses, by which
we distinguish objects or qualities;
these are inlets of knowledge to the
mind, and only through them, can we
receive ideas, (except by inspiration,
which is an inward conviction wrought
by another spirit.) These five senses,
are hearing, seeing, tasting, smelling,
and feeling.
There is an inward feeling of the mind,
as well as an outward feeling of
the body, for instance, sometimes my
mind is calm, yet I feel pain of body, at
other times, my body is well, and I feel
pain of mind, remorse, guilt, fear, &c.
( 116 )
which are not feelings of the body, but
in, or of the mind, which feelings are as
perceptible as the wind blowing upon
the body, and you cannot deny it. Again,
a man walking along, spies the
wild beast of the forest and feels his
hair to rise and his flesh to crawl upon
his bones. What is the cause of this
feeling? It must be the fears in his
mind, originating from a view of his
dangers, and perhaps likewise he may
feel the powers of his limbs in a measure
to fail, and sits down under the shock.
Now allowing the above, why should it
be thought strange, if people were to
fall under the mighty power of God, operating
upon the human mind.
But, says one, it is inconsistent with
reason to adopt the idea that God will
work in this form, but I say hush!
There cannot be a law without a penalty,
and we know that we are accountable
unto God, for our moral conduct:
for we feel it in our own breasts, and
when we do wrong, we feel misery, and
living and dying therein, shall carry our
misery to eternity with us; as death only
separates the fool from the body, but doth
not change the disposition of the mind.
( 117 )
Again, through the medium of organs,
my spirit can convey an idea to
the spirit of another and make him angry
or wrathful, or please him with novelty,
and make him laugh and feel joyful;
if so, then spirit can operate on spirit,
as well as matter upon matter and
convey ideas, ==> and you can't deny it.
If so, why not the divine spirit operate
on the human mind, and give an inward
conviction, &c. of right and wrong? If
we are accountable unto God, then we
are rewardable or punishable, according
to our behaviour and capacity, and of
course, a day of accounts must take
place when these rewards and punishments
must be actually given. From
this, I argue, there is such a thing as
moral evil and good, or vice and virtue,
and of course, there is a road to shun,
and a particular one in which we ought
to walk; therefore it is necessary to have
a guide. And now the question arises,
what guide is necessary? Some say the
Alcoran, but there is more proof for the
belief of the writing of Moses, than for
those of Mahomet. Moses got a whole
nation of people to believe that he led
them through the Red Sea, by drying it
( 118 )
up before them, &c. -- likewise got them
to erect a monument in remembrance,
that they actually saw it, viz. to kill the
paschal lamb and eat him with bitter
herbs, and walk with their staves in their
hands on a certain night of the year;
which monument is now standing, and
has been annually observed among
them, for some thousands of years, tho'
for near eighteen centuries, they have
been scattered as a nation. Now, it is
evident, the most ignorant people could
not be imposed upon, and made to believe
that they saw a river dry up, if
they never did see it dry, and likewise
to get them to erect a monument of
stones in remembrance, that they saw it,
if they never did. But Moses left this
proof of his mission, which the other did
not; therefore there is more reason to
credit him than Mahomet, ==> and you
can't deny it.
Another says, reason is the surest and
only guide; this I deny, because the
greatest divines, so called, disagree as
you may find, that out of about three
hundred and seventy denominations,
thirty one take the scriptures to prove
their doctrines by; yet, out of these
( 119 )
thirty one, neither two agree with regard
to their religious tenets or opinions: yet
one says I am right and you are wrong;
another, no, you are wrong and I am
right; here steps up a Deist and says, all
religion is counterfeit, and the reason
why they so disagree, is because no consistent
system can be formed on the
Christian plan. Answer -- Your objection
proves too much, and is not solid.
For, first, to say all religion is counterfeit,
is inconsistent; because, counterfeit
religion implies a false one, and there
cannot be a false one, except there be
one to falsify, and if there be one to falsify,
before it is falsified, it must be genuine;
therefore, to say all religion is
false, is proving too much, and just argues
that there is a genuine one -- as
there cannot be such a thing as falsehood
without truth, of course counterfeit is
the opposite of genuine.
Again, reason alone is not a sufficient
guide without revelation; because, when
reason was to determine the number of
Gods, she said there was about thirty
thousand, and in this our day, the men
of the greatest acquired information, and
strongest powers of mind who deny revelation,
( 120 )
of whom some Doctors and
Lawyers, &c. may be included, disagree
in their ideas on divine things, and that
which is in connection with them, as
much as the ministers and preachers;
whereas, if reason was a sufficient guide,
suppose they would agree and come into
one particular channel, &c.
Some say the Bible is revelation, but
deny that there is any in this our day,
saying the Bible is sufficient without the
influence of God's spirit. But observe,
I believe in the Scriptures as much as
any person, &c. But with regard to the
influence of the spirit, I believe it is
strictly necessary; for supposing I was
to cast a look at the print and paper,
what would be the benefit, except I realized
the truth of what is contained
therein; and how can I realize it but by
the influence of the same spirit which
dictated its writings? Surely we read
that no man can call Jesus Lord, but
by the Holy Ghost, and that the natural
man, understandeth not the things of
the spirit, for thy are spiritually discerned.
(Rom. 8 c. 0 v. 1 Cor. 20.
11 v. to 16 v. and Chap. 12. 8 v. Rev.
19 c. 10 v.
( 121 )
Why is it that men of the greatest
natural acquired abilities, get to be Deists?
They say it is reason, and that the
more weak and ignorant part embrace
religion; this is pretty true, viz. their
reason makes them Deists, and why?
There are certain ideas which must be
taken through certain mediums, in order
to have a right and just conception
of them; and otherwise, would cause a
person to run into absurdities; for instance,
I heard of a blind man, who
hearing persons talking about colors, informed
them that he tho't he could describe
what the color of red was like, viz.
the sound of a trumpet. This absurdity,
that red was like the sound of a trumpet,
originated by attempting to catch
an idea through the medium of the ear,
which was wrong, and could only be
taken through the medium of the eye. --
Equally absurd would be the idea of
sounds, if taken through the medium of
the eye, which only can be taken thro'
the medium of the ear. So these Deists
attempt to conceive just and accurate
ideas of revealed religion, by natural
reason, which leads them into an absurdity,
and causes them to conclude that it
( 122 )
is imagination, deception, or hypocrisy
in those who pretended to it; whereas, if
they would conceive of it through a different
channel or medium, viz. the inward
sensations or convictions of the
mind, &c. -- if they would give due attention
to the same, as sincere enquirers
after truth, they would feel the spirit of
truth bearing witness to, or of the truth,
to convince and correct, &c. and their
Deism would flee away. O may God.
cause the reader to reflect on what I have
just observed, and turn attention within
your breast, and weigh the convictions
of your mind for eternity!!!
Well, says one, what next? Answer
from the Christian to the Deist -- It is
acknowledged that God is happy and holy;
if so, then reason says, that as likeness
produces likeness, (as wheat brings
forth wheat and motion begets motion,
so every cause producing its own effect.)
man must have been happy and holy
primevally; but it is evident that much
unhappiness is in the world, likewise
unholy fruit, denoting an unholy heart,
in the sons of men. This denotes that a
change hath taken place and destroyed
innocent happiness, and caused the children
( 123 )
of our people to become deceitful,
whereby they watch each other with a
jealous eye. Many, many proofs might
be brought; but let that which comes
within the limits of your acquaintance
be sufficient to convince your
judgment with regard to the present
state of the sobs of men by nature. --
Your own experience, and the premeditated
evil designs of others, in
cool blood, demonstrate that there is
such a thing as vice or moral evil in the
world, and of course there is need for a
moral change; a change within, from
vice to virtue, from sin to holiness, and
from love of pleasure to the love of
God, which can be effected only by the
inspiration of God's holy spirit and
which strives, not with a part barely as
some say, but with all mankind; and for
my own part, I must believe, that as a
small degree of his love when shed abroad
in our hearts, makes us or young
converts, feel such a love towards all,
and that as God's love is infinitely more
than ours, therefore, these contracted
ideas, that God has given a small part
to his son, &c. in a covenant before all
worlds, came not by the teaching of
( 124 )
God's spirit; but by being frequently
harangued from the pulpit, was taken on
trust and tradition, without a close examination
by the spirit and the written
testimony, &c.
Now observe how I hold the covenants.
The first covenant, the covenant
of works, was made with us in Adam,
we being in his loins, he was our
federal head and representative, and God
required him to keep a moral law of innocence
for us in himself, &c. Adam
fell from his innocent happiness, and we
being in his loins fell with him. Well,
says one, would not God have been just
to have damned us for Adam's sin?
Answer -- a punishment should never
exceed the transgression, and of course, we
deserve not a real punishment for that
which we were never actually guilty of;
but as we were passive in the action,
should have been passive in the suffering;
of course, as we fell in Adam's
loins, should have been punished in his
loins, and of course have perished in his
loins. Adam and Eve only were
actually guilty, and of course they only
deserved an actual punishment, which I
believe would have been just in God to
( 125 )
have inflicted; but to punish his posterity
with a personal punishment, for that
of which they were never personally
guilty, would be representing God as
unjust, by making the punishment to exceed
the crime, which would exceed moral
justice. I therefore argue, that as
the punishment should be proportioned
to the crime; if a mediator was not provided,
we should have perished by being
punished in Adam's loins as above -- and
if we had, then God's declarative glory
must have been eclipsed, he not being actually
glorified in our personal salvation
or damnation. In further demonstration
of this idea, I argue, that as every
title to any blessing was forfeited by
Adam's fall, they could never have been
enjoyed, except they were punished (for
if they could there was no need for him
to purchase them for us, &c.) Our temporal
lives being blessings, they came thro'
the merits of Christ, of course, if it had
not been for Christ's merits, we should
not have had this blessing, and of course,
should have perished in Adam, as we fell
with him as above. But as we read that
Christ was a lamb slain (not from all
( 126 )
eternity) form the foundation of the
world, though not actually slain till four
thousand years after; meaning that God
made a revelation of his son to the ancients,
who were saved by faith in a
Messiah which was to come, the same as
we are saved by faith in a Messiah
which hath come eighteen hundred
years ago, &c. as Christ said. Abraham
rejoiced to see my day, he saw
it and was glad. John 8 c. 56 v. Romans
1 c. 19, 20 v., 10 c. 2. 14, 15 v. Galat.
3. 8. Job was an heathen, yet observe
his faith, Job 19 c. 25, 26 v.
Observe, as the first covenant, the
covenant of works was made with us in
Adam, he being our head and representative,
&c. So the second covenant, the
covenant of grace, was not made between
the father and the son, as some do vainly
think, but was made with us in Christ,
he being given to the people for a covenant, &c. *
God had a sovereign right to make the
first Adam and require his obedience, and
when he fell, he had the same sovereign
right to raise up the second Adam as he
* Isaiah, 42. 6. and 19. 8.
( 127 )
had the first, & to require his obedience.
But, says the Deist, there would be no
moral justice to make the innocent suffer
for the guilty. Allowing it, what
then? If the innocent suffer voluntarily,
who can be impeached with injustice?
For instance, if I break a Law and
the penalty is pay five pounds, or take
the lash. If I cannot advance the money,
I must take the stripes. But a gentleman
steps up and voluntarily suffers
the loss of five pounds, out of his own
pocket, no body can be censured with injustice.
At the same time the law having
full satisfaction, would have no further
demand, and of course, I should be
extricated from the punishment. So
Christ, our second Adam, our second
head and representative, was raised up to
heal the breach that Adam made, For
this purpose, he stepped right into the
shoes of the first Adam, between that
law of moral innocence, that Adam was
required to keep for us, and kept it for
us, even as Adam was required to keep
it. How did he keep it? First by a
passive obedience, having no will of his
own, abstract from what law required,
( 128 )
Secondly, by an active obedience,
doing what the law did require,
during the thirty-three years which he
resided in this veil of tears. And thirdly,
by voluntarily laying down his life
to suffer in our lieu, what we must have
suffered in Adam, if he did not do it.
Observe, it was not the divinity of
Christ that suffered, but the manhood.
And where the bible calls Christ the son
of God, it does not allude to his Godhead,
but manhood; as we read, that
he * "he was made of a woman, (who
was the first in the transgression) and
made under the law, as no man ever
came into the world as we are informed
Christ did, &c. Luke, 1. 35. But,
says one, prove that he did it voluntarily.
Very well -- Christ saith, "greater
love than this hath no man than that he
lay down his life for his friends," and
"I lay down my life for the sheep."
Again, "no man taketh my life from
me -- I have power to lay it down, and
power to take it again."
Now, if no man took Christ's life
* Galatians 4. 4. Heb. 10. 5. and 1.
5. 6. John 15. 13, and 10. 18.
( 129 )
from him, then their nailing him to the
tree, did not cause him to die; if not,
then it must have been something else,
and of course, the sin of the world. --
Again, we read, that "Christ was * heard
in that he feared -- and that he pleased
not himself, but gave himself a ransom."
And Heb. 12. 2. "he, for the joy that
was set before him, endured the cross,
despising the shame, and is set down at
the right hand of the throne of God,
&c. Again, he said in the garden of
Gathsemine, "not my will, but thine
be done, &c." which certainly argues
that he had a human will, and when he
thus gave up voluntarily, &c. we find
that the sin of the world was laid upon
him, and caused him to cry out, "my
soul was exceeding sorrowful, even unto
death -- and the agony of his mind, caused
the very blood to gush through the
pores of his skin, and ran down like
drops of sweat; and by his dying so
much sooner than malefactors do in general
when crucified, the governor appeared
to have been astonished, and
* Hebrews 5. 7. Rom. 15. 3.
1 Tim. 2. 6. Luke 22. 42.
( 130 )
marvelled if he were already dead, and
could hardly believe the account till he
had called the Centurian and had it
from his own mouth, &c. Mark 15.
44, 45. I herefrom infer, that as no
man took his life from him, and as he
died out of the common course of nature,
that something out of the course
of nature killed him -- which must have
been the sin of the world. And when
he had suffered as much as what was
necessary to suffer, even unto death, the
law which Adam broke, had full satisfaction
on him, and having full satisfaction,
it had no further demand. On
the third day the DIVINITY raised the
humanity from the dead, by which means,
life and immortality are brought to
light by the gospel; and glory be to God.
We read nothing about John the Methodist,
nor John the Presbyterian, in
all the Bible, but we read of John the
Baptist; and what did he say? John 1.
29. He sayeth, "behold the lamb of
God, which taketh away the sin of the world."
Observe, the sin of the world was the
sin of Adam, as he was the representative
( 131 )
of the world, and Christ, the second
Adam, John says, took it away -- How?
By atoning for it, &c. Now if John
preached up that Christ took away the
sin of the world, then all John's people
ought to preach it up; and if he took
it away, then it does not lie upon us,
and if not, then we do not feel the guilt,
only the effect, which is the evil corrupt
nature instinct within, &c. and not the guilt.
Thus, you see, the first covenant of
works was made with us in our first
head, and the second covenant with us
in our second head, (Christ.)
According to Isaiah 53. 6, all we like
sheep, are gone astray, &c. and the
Lord hath laid upon him (Christ) the
iniquity of us all.
Observe, John did not say sins of the
world, but sin, the singular, and the
prophet Isaiah doth not say iniquities,
but iniquity, which must have alluded
to the fall of man. Therefore, the plaster
is as large as the wound. As we
read Rom. 5. 18. therefore, as by the
offence of one, judgment came upon all
men unto condemnation, even to (not
( 132 )
uneven) by the righteousness of one, the
free gift came upon all men unto justification
of life. Observe the words justification
and regeneration are not synonymous,
as some use them, but are
of different meanings. Regeneration
signifies to be born of the spirit of God,
i. e. to be purified within by its inspiration,
and to become holy and Godlike,
&c. But justification signifies to acquit
and look upon us free from guilt.
And now if the free gift from God by
Christ, came upon all men unto justification
of life, I herefrom would infer
that God hath justified all men by the
death of his son, i. e. acquitted them
from what is called the guilt of original
sib, and looks upon them free therefrom,
as they come into the world.
From the above you may see that I
make a distinction between justification
and regeneration -- likewise, that I acknowledge
that we feel the effect of Adam's
fall, but not the guilt, and that a
change is necessary, &c. -- But says one,
how can infants be happy? They can't
repent. Answer -- they need no repentance
who die in infancy, because to
repent of the sin of Adam, they need
( 133 )
not, as Christ took that away. And
they have no actual sins of their own to
repent of, and of course, need no repentance.
All that is necessary to be
done for them, is to have them purified
from the evil propensity with which
they are born into the world, which is
the effect of the fall -- Observe, John 1.
9. we read that Christ is the true light,
which lighteth every man that cometh
into the world. Observe this light being
of a sanctifying nature, brings sanctification
with it, and where it is not
resisted, it sanctifies. And if it lighteth
every man that cometh into the world,
then it lighteth the very heathens, and
those infants that die in fancy, or else
how can it be said, he lighteth every man
that cometh into the world, &c. Surely
if any are not lighted by the true light,
they never came into the world, (for all
that do are) and where they are to be
found, I can't tell; and if any are reprobated
unconditionally, it must be
them ==> and you cannot deny it. The
infant dying in its infancy, is not in a
capacity to resist that light. I herefrom
infer, that the light sanctifies it,
( 134 )
and prepares it for the fruition of God
in glory.
Some people suppose that all the
heathens are damned; but for my own
part I beg leave to dissent from that
opinion, for the word Christian signifith
Christ like, as we read that they
which have not the spirit of Christ, are
none of his; which implies those that
are his, have his spirit, and if Christ
lighteth all by his spirit, then he lightens
the heathens; and if they, instead
of resisting the light, yield to its influence,
it will distill the nature of Christ
in them, and then they will be Christians,
not in name but in nature. And
if they act according to the light they
have, I must believe it will be well
with them in eternity. For I cannot
believe any man will be damned for the
sin of ignorance, which he could not
possibly avoid.
Some people suppose that none will
be saved but those of their particular
party or opinion.
But for my own part, I must observe
as a Dutchman in New York state said, the
merchants when we carry out our wheat to
market, do not enquire what road the
( 135 )
wheat came, but their enquiry is, is the
wheat good? So when we are called
to an account for the deeds done in the
body, I do not expect it will be enquired
what road or party I came, but is
the wheat or heart good.
O ye different sects, who all declare,
Lo, here is Christ, and Christ is there;
Your strongest proofs divinely give,
And shew us where the Christians live,
Your claim, alas, you cannot prove,
Ye want the genuine mark of LOVE.
Rev. 5. 9. and 7. 9. we read of some
out of every nation, kindred, tongue
and people, &c. standing with the lamb
of God on Mount Zion, or singing redeeming
love. Therefore, Christianity
is not confined to name nor party; but
as Peter saith, God is no respector of
persons, but he that feareth God and
worketh righteousness, is accepted with
him in every nation, Acts 10. 34, 35.
But, says one, how can a heathen be
saved when he never heard of Christ, and
there is no other name given, whereby
we can be saved, but in and through
him. Answer -- Christ, in scripture
( 136 )
sense, is termed the mercy of God, and
the heathen do believe in the mercy of
the great man above. Therefore, in
this sense, they believe in Christ, though
they never heard of him by the hearing
of the outward ear. Cant. 8. 8. we read
about a little sister that hath no breasts,
which no doubt, alludeth to the heathen
church, which have not the two
breasts, i. e. the Old and New Testaments;
yet will be accepted according
to the light they have, as by the parable
of the talents, if they occupy. And the
rejection of the man with the one talent
was for his not occupying, and he was
not commanded to occupy it, till the
talent was given -- ==> And you can't
deny it.
Conscience, so called, is the result of
the judgment, and the judgment is the
result or conclusion of the understanding,
and according to the information or
illumination of the understanding, so
the judgment is formed pro or con, and
accordingly the conscience speak, from
which I argue that reason without revelation
or the influence of the holy spirit,
is not a sufficient guide; for instance,
a Roman's conscience will not
( 137 )
allow him to eat an egg on Friday, and
yet they will curse and swear. A Quaker's
conscience will not allow him to
partake of the sacrament, as a sincere
one informed me, when taken prisoner
by the Romish rebels in Ireland, they
strove to make him conform to their
ceremonies -- he replied, nothing that
you can inflict will make me yield.
Thus you see, men's consciences lead
them diametrically opposite to each
other -- from which I argue, that conscience
is not properly regulated,
and thereby runs into absurdity, as
Paul mentions some, whose consciences
were defiled, &c.
Any man who does a thing contrary
to what he thinks or judges is right, his
conscience, which is the result of his
judgment, will convict or condemn him.
Therefore, supposing a man's understanding
to be misinformed, he might
conclude or judge a thing to be wrong
( 138 )
when it is right, and thereby feel conviction,
as if in an error, when in fact
there is none but his mistake, &c. --
From this I again argue, the need that
we have of revelation, in order to understand
and know our duty aright, and
likewise to form proper ideas of GOD,
and eternal things, &c.
As God is a spirit, we can know no
more of him than what he is pleased to
reveal, except we draw it from his dealings
with his creatures, &c. and as we
have not the language of immortality,
we can form no just or proper ideas of
the eternal, immortal, or celestial realms,
or world; but by the representations of
earthly things. Therefore, for the
want of a better language, we have to
make use of the most striking metaphors
or representations that moral
language will or can admit, &c.
and this is so far short of the real
essence of the matter, that if people
are not much aware, they will form improper
ideas from unmeaning expressions
which we are obliged to use for the
want of better, and so form wrong ideas
by drawing a wrong conclusion relative
to the same, and then lay down those
( 139 )
ideas for positive arguments. By these
means, much error is gone, abroad into
the world; and from expressions similar
to these -- INFINITE NUMBER, an eternal
decree, &v. -- Now observe, there is no
number but what may be enlarged by
the addition of units; but that which is
infinite cannot be enlarged. Therefore
in talk about infinite numbers, is a contradiction
in terms.
Again, a decree is an action or determination
of the mind, and there cannot
be an action or decree passed, but what
there must be a particular space or period
of time when the decree was actually
passed, or took place, &c. -- if so,
of course, to talk about an external decree,
is a contradiction, just as if eternity
began at the particular time when
the decree was actually passed, &c. --
==> and you cannot deny it.
Light giveth sight, sight giveth sense,
and sense giveth sorrow. When the
divine influence shines into the understanding,
and gives the soul a discovery
of the danger to which sin exposes it, &c.
The soul that yieldeth obedience to this
light, findeth the mind to grow solemn,
( 140 )
under a sense of eternal things, the heart
to grow tender, and the conscience to
be as the apple of an eye, arising from
a view of their situation, occasioned by
this divine relationship in the mind, &c.
So the soul, seeing the evil of sin, which
at once cleaved to in love, now abhors
it like one fleeth from a serpent. Here
penitence takes place, the heart melts
to tenderness like wax before the fire,
and becomes willing to part with their
sins, and to be saved by free grace; they
likewise feel a cry in their hearts for
mercy, not like the man who says over
his prayers as a lazy school boy says his
lesson, and thinks he has done his stent,
but rather like a drowning man that
cannot swim, calls mightily to one on
the shore for help, or I am drowned, &c.
Their cry is, what shall I do to be saved?
God be merciful to me a sinner!
Here is repentance pointed out, which
implies three things -- first, a sensibility
of the evil done -- secondly, brokenness
of heart, or contrition of mind for it --
and, thirdly, a willingness to make confession
or satisfaction, &c. Observe, a
man cannot repent of his error till he is
sensible he is in one -- here I again argue
( 141 )
the need of revelation to give an internal
conviction, with regard to that
which is displeasing in God's sight , &c.
Again, if a man persists in a thing, he
does not abhor it, and of course does
not repent of it, for if he did, he would
forsake it, instead of delighting and persisting
in it, &c. Again, if one be in an
evil and will not confess it from his
heart to the injured or abused, he is impenitent;
of course, he does not repent --
God pity him! The way to have
repentance towards God is to yield
obedience to the influence of God's
awakening spirit, and consideration is
the first thing; God help thee, O reader,
to adhere to the inward whispering
voice, and seriously reflect on the value
of thy soul; the shortness and uncertainty
of time, and the necessity of
improving your accountability for eternity.
Again, a resolution is positively
necessary to be on the Lord's side, as
saith Christ, the kingdom of Heaven
suffereth violence, and the violent take
it by force. The prodigal son came to
himself, (which implies he was beside
himself, as every sinner is) and reflected
or considered, how many hired servants,
( 142 )
&c. at my father's house, and I perish
with hunger. A resolution was then
formed; I will arise and go to my father;
and the resolution was put into
practice, not in a dilatory way, as
though he must first go and tell the
citizen; but he at once left all behind,
and his father did not wait for him to
get clear home, but met with him when
he was yet a great way off.
So, reader, if you intend to serve God,
you must count the cost, and then enlist
for the war, i. e. set out for eternity,
and give up the idols of your heart, for
you cannot serve two masters, saith
Christ. And again, he that loveth father,
mother, brother or sister, wife or
children, houses or lands, more than
me, is not worthy of me; and except a
man deny himself, and take up his daily
cross and follow me, he cannot be my
disciple. God help thee to reflect whether
you will set out and encounter the
difficulties to enjoy future happiness,
or whether you will slight the offers of
Heaven, and sell your soul for the sake
of the pleasures of vice, which you can
now roll under your tongue as a sweet
morsel, but your latter end will be
( 143 )
bitter; O will you run the risk of being
cut off in your sins!!
Faith is a divine conviction, wrought
in the mind by the spirit of God, that
there is a reality in the invisible world,
or a supernatural evidence communicated
to the understanding, that there
is a reality in spiritual things, as saith
the apostle, say not in thine heart, who
shall ascend into Heaven to bring
Christ from above, or who shall descend
into the deep to bring up Christ,
&c. But the word is nigh thee, even
in thy mouth, and in thine heart, i. e.
the word of faith which we preach. --
Rom. 10. 6, 7, 8. The word there spoken
of, is what in other parts of the Bible
is called the word of God, which is
the divinity of Jesus Christ, (speaking to
the hearts of the sons of men, as you
may observe, John 1, 1, to 4 verse, and
15. 3, 22. Some people suppose that
faith and belief are synonymous expressions,
with one and the same meaning;
but I think they are different, and that
believing is the act of faith, the same as
seeing is the act of sight. I cannot see
without sight; God gives me sight;
( 144 )
but the act of seeing is mine. So believing
is the act of faith, it is the act of
the creature; if it were not so, why
should we be commanded to believe,
and condemned for unbelief or not believing?
Surely, believing is the action of the
creature, but he cannot believe without
faith, any more than I can see without
light -- faith is the gift of God, that it,
the internal power to realize spiritual
and eternal things. Well, says one,
when I attempt to pray, what shall I
believe? Answer -- prayer being the
sincere desire of the heart, earnestly
ascending to God: when you feel your
need of a blessing, raise your desires
with fervency in expectation, believing
that God is able to give you the things
you feel you need. Believe, secondly,
that he is willing to do it, as he willeth
not the death of a sinner, but that all
should come to repentance. (Ezek. 33. 11.)
2 Peter, 3. 9. Believe, thirdly,
that he will bless you because he has
promised it. Observe, some people
claim the promises when they have no
right to them, for they live in the commission
of known sin -- "for the ways of
( 145 )
sin is death," and "the soul that sinneth
it shall die," But those who are
willing to part with their sins, have a
right to the promises of God, according
to Prov. 28. 13. and Matt. 11. 28. for
God cannot lie, says Paul. Therefore,
God is bound by the law of his nature,
to perform his promises to the sons of
men, when they fulfill the condition,
which is to be sensible of their need,
and become penitentially passive in his
hand; so far resigned as to have no will
of their own abstract from his, and yet
active to continue his will, willing to do
it as far as it is manifested, &c. Some
people under a sense of their unworthiness,
think that God is so very angry
with them, that he will not receive them
till they are better, and of course, that
they must do something to pacify him,
just as if his will must be turned in order
to be willing to receive them. But
observe the Poet saith --
"If you tarry till you are better,
"You will never come at all."
Therefore, you cannot make yourself
better by tarrying from him a span, by
striving to do something to recommend
( 146 )
yourself to his favor. But remember
that God is willing to receive you, if
you are but willing to receive him at
the expense of your sins, and submit,
for him to take possession and reign
within. For we read 2 Cor. 5. 18, 19
and 20 verses, that God is in Christ reconciling
the world to himself; and it
is for us to be reconciled to God, as
God is love, and his love, according to
John 3. 16, 17, influenced him to send
his son to make it possible for our salvation.
Therefore, he is willing to receive
us, if we are willing to receive
him, as now is the Lord's accepted time
and day of salvation, all things are now
ready, &c. Therefore, take GOD at his
word now, and let thy soul's desires be
enlarged in expectation of the blessing,
as the watchmen looketh out for the dawn
of day, believing as Christ died for all, he
died for me. Now is the time for salvation,
and I can only receive him by faith.
"Lord, I give myself to thee,
"'Tis all that I can do."
The very moment you thus yield,
and give up and submit to the grace of
God by throwing down the weapons of
your rebellion, relying your whole dependence
( 147 )
on the mercy of God in the
merits of the Redeemer for salvation,
&c. that very moment the spirit which
converts will give the testimony of parson,
and reconciliation in the beloved;
(Revel. 3. 20) and thou wilt feel a
change within, whereby thou can say
one thing, I know, that whereas I was
blind I now see, or the thing I once
hated I now love, and the thing I once
loved I now hate, i. e. the things of the
world, which I once placed my heart
upon, I see how empty and vain they
are, and religion, which I little esteemed,
I prize to be of more value than all the
world besides. Give me Christ, or else
I die.
"Only Jesus, will I know,
"And Jesus crucified."
The word hope, implies a well grounded
expectation of the enjoyment of
something in future; therefore, it is
more than a bare wish, desire or presumption,
that it will be so, without any
evidence, &c.
Supposing I was condemned to die
for the horrid crime of murder, and
there is no possibility of escape, one
asks me, Lorenzo, do you expect to escape
( 148 )
the gallows? I reply, I hope so.
Now if there be no probability of escape,
how could I hope? I would naturally
despair, and if I despaired, I could not
hope, for hope and despair do not go
hand in hand. So my hope would be
but a wish or desire. So it is with some
sinners who are more afraid of what
will happen after death, then they are
of death itself, and yet say they hope to
go to Heaven, when they die, and yet
they know in their own hearts and feel
that they are unprepared, &c.
I herefrom argue, that their hope is
nothing but a wish or desire; for doubtless
they would wish to escape misery,
as self preservation is said to be the first
law of nature. But a wish or a desire
(which all feel at times, &c.) will no
more carry a person to Heaven without
practice, than a desire to see my
parents, would carry me to New England,
or when there, bring me back to
Cumberland county, in this state, to
see my Papa and Mama Hobson, &c.
without a determination or resolution.
Again, suppose a man possessing a
plantation would neither plow nor
plant, yet expect a crop in the fall, because
( 149 )
God was able to make it grow in
a day -- this man's hope would be nothing
but presumption -- presuming on the
power of God without any evidence
that God would exert that power. --
Just so it is with some people, say they,
I have not been so bad as many of my
neighbors, and God is good, and Christ
is good, and I hope to make out some
how when I die. Thus they conclude
all is well, without evidence, and deceive
themselves. This presumptuous
hope will do to live by, but will desert
the planter in the fall, and thee in death.
O reader! thou mayest cry peace,
but remember it is a great thing to die
and change words, and pass into eternity
and appear before God.
Examine, O examine whether thou
hast a well grounded hope.
Observe, the Christian hopes for happiness
beyond this life, and his hope is
something more than a bare wish or presumption
that it will be so without evidence,
but rather he is like the man who
plows the ground, the crop springs up
and begins to grow, there is a fine probability
that he will have a crop in the
( 150 )
fall: so the christian has a probability
of Heaven or future bliss, arising from
a good prospect, for the spirit of Christ
which reigns in Heaven, hath convicted
him, and given him a divine evidence
relative to his present dangerous state,
brought him to repentance, enabled
him to yield obedience, and given him
an evidence of pardon, so the burden is
gone, and the man feels a change
wrought within, and can tell you an
experience. God pity those that have
not experienced repentance towards
God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.
Again, the Christian viewing the
goodness and mercy of God in redemption,
and viewing a beauty in holiness.
feels his heart drawn out in love to the
Lord and to his ways, and can say in
Bible language, "Lord, thou knowest
that I love thee; or we love God because
he first loved us." And they
obey him not so much out of a slavish
fear of being damned, as out of a loving
filial fear of offending. Again, they
love the Lord's people according to
the eleventh commandment, and can
say with John, "by this we know, that
( 151 )
we have passed from death unto life, because
we love the brethren." The Christian
loves the image of his master
wherever he can see it; he loves their
company and conversation, for their
hearts run together in cords of love, like
two drops of water. And Christ has
given us a method whereby the wicked
may know whether we possess religion
or not. John 13. 34, 35. By this shall
all men know, that ye are my disciples,
if ye have love one to another.
Observe, you take a piece of iron and
wood, and you cannot weld them together,
but two pieces of iron might be
welded together -- but iron if welded
around wood, the wood would shrink
from it and get loose. So relative to
religion -- two Christians will unite like
iron, but it is not every professor that is
a real possessor. And the non-possessing
professor, will not unite with the true
professor, and if an appearance of unity
is taking place, they will shrink from it
like the wood from the iron, which hath
too frequently been the case in Christendom,
to the no small injury of the cause
( 152 )
of religion in the unbelieving world.
But as far as holiness prevails, so far a
union of spirit will take place. O may
God carry on the revival of religion, now
in the earth, and open a door for the promulgation
of the gospel, and may laborers
be raised up, such as will count
not their lives dear to themselves, so
that they may finish their course with
joy, and a nation be born to God in a
day, and the nations learn war no more.
Again, the spirit of Christ influenceth
his followers to obey his commandments,
which are, to love your enemies,
to bless them that curse you, and pray
for them that de spitefully use and persecute you.
And that man who cannot pray for
his enemies, but feels malice against
them, hath got no religion, for the Christian
being holy, abhors their evil conduct,
yet loves their precious souls with
a love of pity, Mat. 5. 44, &c.
Again, he being justified by faith, he
hath peace with God through Christ.
The spirit of peace reigning within, he
hath peace of conscience, and becomes
a peace-maker; and such are called the
( 153 )
children of God, Mat. 5. 9. and this
influences him to live peaceably with
all men, as much as what the nature
and circumstances of things will admit
of. Likewise, this peace makes his soul
like the ocean, while the surface is uneven
by the tempestous storms, the
bottom of it is calm; so the Christian
possessing this peace within, while in the
midst of outward difficulties, the centre
of the soul is calmly stayed on God.
Again there is joy in the Holy Ghost,
which is sweeter than the honey from
the honey-comb, and will give refreshment
to the mind like corporeal bread,
refreshing the hungry body, to the satisfaction
thereof. The things of this
world, can no more give contentment
to the mind, than a handful of sand can
refresh the hunger of the body; for the
mind is spirit, and its happiness must be
spiritual, and come from a spiritual
source; of course from God, consequently
it must be found in religion.
Therefore, we need the influence of
the holy spirit, which I call inspiration
or revelation, &c. which we all feel at
( 154 )
times and seasons temperate upon our
minds, causing good desires to spring up
within, &c.
And by the help of this spirit, many
have, and all may repent, if they will
but obey it whilst the day of mercy lasts,
as faith the maxim --
While the lamp holds out to burn,
The vilest sinner may return;
But if you will not when you may,
When you will, you shall have nay.
And now, reader, thou knowest, that
abstract from religion, thou hast never
taken happiness in things of the world,
sufficient to counterbalance thy troubles
and sorrows. Now come and try religion,
and see what solid satisfaction may
be found in that, and if after a suitable
trial, thou wilt tell me that thou hast
found no benefit by it worth thy while,
I will never ask thee to pursue religion
again, but thou canst turn back to sin,
and the Devil will be as willing to take
you then, as he is now, &c.
The eighth quality of the Christian
fruit is temperance -- many, to avoid one
extreme, run into another on the other
side. Temperance implies avoiding extremes,
by striking the medium -- I may
( 155 )
talk too little, and prevent my usefulness
-- I may talk too much, and spoil
my influence -- Likewise, eat too little
or too much, and injure my constitution --
also, drink too little, or perhaps
drink too much, and get drunk, and become
worse than a beast or devil, for
they do not get drunk; and in this one
sin, I commit ever so many -- first, I
injure my body -- secondly, I bring s
scandal on myself -- thirdly, I set a bad
example for others -- fourthly, I lay out
my money for that which is worse than
if thrown into the fire -- fifthly, I break
the command of God -- sixthly, I quench
the good spirit -- seventhly, I deprive
myself of the power of reason -- eighthly,
I hereby am liable to injure or murder
my friends, &c. &c. Therefore, O
youth, beware of the cursed growing
practice in these climes -- observe to be
temperate in all things.
Ninthly, there is meekness, which implies
humility, or the possessing the spirit
of our station, to act in the sphere
of life, which heaven hath allowed or
qualified us for; nor wishing to appear
above what we really are, neither to
sink ourselves below our proper dignity;
( 156 )
whether among the great or small, willing
to take up our daily cross and follow
Christ through evil as well as
through good report to joys on high.
Christ saith, come and learn of me, for
I am meek and lowly in heart, Matt. 11. 29.
But some people are proud and
haughty and think great I and LITTLE U.
The tenth quality of the fruit, is long
suffering; for if God had come out in
strict justice, he would have cut us
down while in our sins, as cumberers of
the ground -- but he bore with us, and
forbore to cut us off, that we might
have a longer space to repent in.
So we should be God-like in this respect,
and never return evil for evil, but
contrariwise, good for evil, and bear
and forbear as much as what the nature
and circumstances of the case will admit of.
Again, gentleness is another quality
of the fruit, as saith the Apostle, a servant
must not strive, but be gentle, and
let your moderation be known to all
men, &c. Some people give reproof
in anger, &c. to the no small injury
of Christianity, by prejudicing minds
thereby against it, &c. But as God
( 157 )
came to Adam in the cool of the day,
and as soft words turn away wrath, I
entreat those into whose hands this may
fall, never to take the harsher way,
when love will do the deed. For by
reproving in anger, you make the opposite
party angry -- they then will take
you to be their enemy, and thereby
their ears are cut off, and none but
Christ can heal them on; so your talk
will be as chaff before the wind.
But go in gentleness, in the Christian
spirit with sound argument, and though
they get raised at first, yet this way will
tend to cool them down, and convince
their judgment, they see their error, feel
conviction, and for the sake of peace of
mind, reform. &c. How much more
probable is this way of success than the other?
The twelfth and last quality I shall
now mention, is patience, which implies
bearing trials with an humble resignation
to the will of God, believing that he
will carry us through, &c. The greatest
mercies, when abused, becomes the
greatest curses, as the offers of mercy
when rejected is the cause of the sinners
condemnation; whereas, the greatest
( 158 )
afflictions, when sanctified, are mercies
in disguise; for instance, it is said that a
man in the reign of Queen Mary, said
every thing which happened to him
would be for the best; and he was to
be burned as a heretic, on account of
his religion, &c. and being made prisoner,
when crossing London bridge, happened
to fall down and break a limb.
Said the guard, will this be for the best?
He answered in the affirmative; and
before he got able to walk to the stake
to be burnt, the Queen died, and the
law was altered, by which means his
life was preserved -- thus see the
truth of his words. Whatever trials I
bring upon myself by my misconduct, I
may thank myself for it.
But whatever trials befall me, when in
the path of duty, such as I cannot avoid
without getting out of duty's path --
such I believe happen not by chance,
nor come from the dust, but are God's
mercies in disguise, as above.
We read that it is through much tribulation,
we are to enter into the kingdom
of God. And those who have got
through, came out of great tribulation,
and all that will live Godly in Christ,
( 159 )
shall suffer persecution, which implies
that if he meets with no opposition, he
hath not religion enough to make the
devil angry with him. Again, Christ
saith, in the world you shall have tribulation,
but in me you shall have
peace, and Heb. 12, we read what son
is he whom the father chasteneth not.
And though no chastening for the present,
seemeth to be joyous, but grievous,
nevertheless, afterwards, it yieldeth
the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto
them, which are exercised thereby; and
we have not an high priest which cannot
be touched with the feelings of our infirmities;
but glory to God, he can, as
saith the Poet,
"He in the days of feeble flesh,
"Pour'd out strong cries and tears,
"And in his measure feel afresh,
"What every member bears.
"A smoaking flax he will not quench,
"But raise it to a flame,
"A bruised reed he will not break
"Nor scorn the meanest name."
Therefore,
"Ye fearful saints fresh courage take,
"The clouds ye so much dread,
( 160 )
"Are big with mercies, and shall break
"In blessings on your head."
Therefore,
"Ye conquering souls fight on,
"And when the conquest toy have won,
"Palms of victory you shall bear,
"And in Christ's kingdom have a share,
"And crowns of glory ever wear,
"In endless day,"
Christ saith, Luke 21. 18. In your
patience possess ye your souls -- O how
much there is contained in this expression!
And if we possess our souls in
our patience, how ought we to exercise
patience under trials, and be resigned to
the will of Providence, who hath the
disposal of all events, least we prevent
the sanctification of the affliction,
and thereby lose a blessing, and get a
curse. James saith, you have heard of
the patience of Job, and seen the end
of the Lord, and exhorted his brethren
to count it joy, when they fell into
temptations or afflictions for a trial of
their faiths, which worketh patience, and
patience experience, &c. which enlarges
the captivity, so that we shall be
( 161 )
more capable of enjoying God here and
hereafter. Job's afflictions were great,
yet remember, God carried him thro';
and first, Job had a great experience,
which otherwise he could not have had;
second, he saw the salvation of God;
third, his latter end was blessed twice as
much as his beginning; fourth, his
enemies were brought to bow to him,
and this is left on record for the benefit
of the after generations; and God in
this our duty, frequently sees it necessary
to suffer his dear children to pass thro'
trials and difficulties, to set them up as
examples of patience for others to copy
after, and to wean them from the world,
and ripen them for the kingdom of everlasting
glory; and those who put their
trust in him, he defendeth not, but proportions
their strength to their day, and
gives them suffering grace in trying
times. Yea, he is with them in six trials,
and in the seventh he forsakes them
not, as saith the Apostle; he will not
suffer you to be tempted above what you
are able to bear; but will with the temptation
make way for your escape. A
storm denotes a calm; so do trials and
( 162 )
afflictions denote good days, to those
who put their trust in God, with prayer
and resignation to his disposal.
When all things go well with me, like
pleasant sailing, I conceive there is a
storm some where gathering; I endeavor
to lay out accordingly, for a trial,
and by so doing, I am prepared for it,
when it comes, and if I am disappointed,
I am disappointed on the right side.
It is now upwards of eight years, that I
have devoted my life as a travelling
missionary, though not in the common
way, but rather like the fowls of the air,
more dependent for my daily bread,
have no particular source to depend
upon, except divine providence, whom
as yet I have never found to desert me,
no, not in my greatest discouragements;
but hitherto he hath helped and raised
me up friends in times of need, and
now I am among kind friends, and tho'
I expect trials are before me previous
to my dissolution, yet he who hath been
with me, I trust will still continue his
mercy, and one day take me to rest
above where the wicked shall cease
from troubling and the weary are at rest.
( 163 )
"When all our toils are o'er,
"Our sufferings and our pain,
"Who meet on that eternal shore,
"Shall never part again."
David saith, Psalms 84. 11, No good
thing will God withhold from them that
walk uprightly, therefore, if God withholds
a thing from the upright in heart,
it is because he sees that the fruition of
it would not be best for them in the
long run. And Paul saith, all things
shall work together for good to them
that love God. Therefore, let us lie
passive in the hand of Providence, at
the disposal of his will, knowing that if
we are active to enquire and do it according
to the light and knowledge
imparted, it being the delight of Providence
to do his needy creatures good --
he will be well pleased with us in Christ,
and choose those things which shall be
for our present and eternal good; for
God is love, and doth not willingly
afflict the righteous, or punish the wicked,
without a cause, for his tender care
is over all his works. Therefore, it is
not good to be our own choosers, least
( 164 )
we pursue wrong things, and be brought
into difficulties and woe. But rather
give thy heart to God, who will then
become thy friend; for this purpose,
watch much, pray much, and that in
private. Give daily attention likewise
to the scriptures, and follow the inward
convictions of the divine spirit, which
leadeth from vice to virtue, and from
the love of sin to the love of God, and
from the things of earth to the things of
heaven, &c. and live as you would wish
to die, and be willing to give an account
to the GREAT JUDGE of all the
earth "MAN PREPARE TO
MEET THY GOD ---- may the Lord
bless you and bring us to glory." ---
Adieu.
Lorenzo Dow, F. M. K.
At the house of my Papa and Mamma, |
in Cumberland County, Virginia, }
April 12, 1804. |
|