Dec. 14, 1878 Samuel Williams Letter Theodore Albert Schroeder Papers: Box 2, folder 1. Wisconsin State Historical Society Library, Madison, WI Partial Catalog: Theodore A. Schroeder Papers Transcriber's Comments see also Williams letters: Nov. 12, 1878 Dec. 3, 1878 | 1842 Williams Pamphlet |
|
|
|
|
This is a fascinating revelation indeed, for if Mrs. Spalding ever made a statement identifying Joseph Patterson as having been the Mr. Patterson with whom her husband had dealings, then that statement, unfortunately, no longer survives. Even so, this assertion by Rev. Williams provides a completely independent and critically important corroboration of Mrs. McKinstry's recollection, as related to Redick McKee on 31 October 1882 -- nearly four years after the date of this letter (see Chapt. V) -- of her mother's having said that there had been two Mr. Pattersons involved with her husband; and of the Rev. Robert Patterson, Jr.'s identification of the principal Mr. Patterson as having been his uncle Joseph rather than his father Robert based upon the physical descriptions of the two. Since, as far as can be ascertained, neither the Rev. Williams' letter (above) nor any of Mr. Cobb's research relating to it have ever been previously published, and since Rev. Robert Patterson, Jr. fails to reference it in his 1882 work "Who Wrote the Book of Mormon?," and indeed appears to have been completly unaware of it until disabused by McKee's letter, there is no evidence to support any argument that either Mrs. McKinstry's 31st October, 1882, recollection to McKee, or McKee's early November account of it to Rev. Patterson, could have been unduly influenced or inspired by prior knowledge of this material. -NOTE: Very little is known about JAMES T. COBB (1834-c.1900), to whom the above three letters and a number of those which follow in this file were written. He was apparently born in Boston or possibly New York (the son of later Utah pioneer James Cobb?), was a graduate of both Dartmouth and Amhurst colleges, and in 1860 was a teacher (with Orson Pratt, Jr.) at the Union Academy in Salt Lake City. It is possible but by no means certain that he was a polyandrous husband of Mary van Cott (1844-1884; see obit. Deseret Evening News, 5 Jan. 1884, p.5) who became Brigham Young's fifty-first plural wife on 8 January 1865, and [to] whom she had one child. During the winter of 1865-66 he appears to have been in New York City on a mission (Letters of Brigham Young, 21 Fe. 1866), but was back in Salt Lake City by 30 Sep. 1866 (Wilfred Woodruff Journal VI, p. 299). From fragments of his correspondence (Theodore Schroeder Collection) it is known that he had at least one sister. It would appear that Cobb became disaffected with the LDS in the 1870s. In 1878, while working as a newsman for the non-Mormon Salt Lake City Tribune, he began an investigation into the Spalding Enigma apparently with the intention of publishing a book on the subject which for some reason he never completed. The 1890s found him once again in New York City where, like Arthur B. Deming, he seems to have become addicted to drugs (opium? morphine?) and where it appears that he died around the turn of the century. A letter from RLDS President Joseph Smith III to Robert Patterson, Jr. dated Lamoni, Iowa, 20 January 1883, however, provides a somewhat different version (see RLDS tract No. 36, "The Spalding Story Re-examined," 16 pp., n.d.). In this letter, Smith claims to have been informed that James T. Cobb was "the son of the woman known as Brigham Young's Boston wife... an intimate of Brigham's family... partaker of his bounty, and a member of the [Utah] church." Smith then goes on to say that Cobb's domestic life had been poisoned "by the defection of his own wife; and subsequently still, his daughter, Luella, [who] became the polygamous wife of John W. Young," and that "for these reasons he [was] an intense hater of Mormonism." |
|